Untitled Post

I am finding the contrast between Governor George Pataki prior to the 2002 election (“Look at all the wonderful things I’ve done for New York!”) and Governor George Pataki after the 2002 election (“Look at all the wonderful things I’m going to be lacerating from our deficit-ridden budget!”) rather interesting, especially considering everyone pretty much knew this was the way things were going to be, but heaven forbid that the media actually hold the candidates’ feet — all of the candidates — to the fire on this.

Is it like this in other states as well?

Share This Post

Untitled Post

WARNING: Profanity ahead.

An unintended consequence, but something of an unexpected pleasure, of blogging is the nifty adjectives and metaphorical phrases I pick up along the way. Of course, some of them are obnoxious and annoying (“idiotarian” being a prime example), but there really are a few that I like. I’m not sure what it says about me, though, that the ones I like best are all derived from profanity. Anyhow, here are my three favorites, the mere sight of which in a post makes me smile even if I disagree vehemently with the content.

:: Courtesy PNH: “Shit-kicking”. (As in: “Alterman has really written a shit-kicking book here!”)

:: Courtesy Rachel Lucas: “Asshatted”. (As in: “I wish all of these asshatted Hollywood liberals would shut up!”)

:: And my favorite, courtesy Warren Ellis: “Eat my fuck.” Yes, it’s a purely juvenile reaction, not unlike Beavis and Butthead, but every time I see this concatenation of words, I laugh. Go figure.

OK, back to family-friendly posting.

Share This Post

Untitled Post

Clear your mind, if you will. I would like to take you on a journey.

Imagine you’re going to a job interview. First, imagine that when the guy called to set up the interview in the first place, you asked him what his company does, since it wasn’t clear from the newspaper ad. He tells you, “We’ll discuss that at the interview.”

OK. Now you’re walking into the place. It’s in a not-run-down, but not particularly nice office complex out in one of the older suburbs. You notice that the company name on the door you’ve been directed to is not the same as the company name in the advertisement you answered. This is probably the reason why, in the phone call, the boss-guy told you to go to the door with a picture of a rhinoceros on it. (Forget the rhinoceros. No explanation is ever forthcoming.)

You walk in the front door, into the reception area. Here you are greeted by a receptionist who looks barely old enough to drive or vote, and she is bundled up just shy of still wearing her parka because the office is kept quite cold, despite the sounds of air blasting from the vent overhead. Her desk appears to have nothing on it save one (1) binder, a few file folders and clipboards, a fax machine, and a phone. No computer, no photos of the dog or boyfriend or goldfish or mother or parish priest.

You look around at the reception room. There are some chairs — standard waiting-area chairs that will be found in any dentist’s office or LensCrafters. There is a table with the requisite selection of magazines, none younger than one year and none remotely interesting. There is a single potted tree that looks like it needs water, and the sole decoration is a map of the United States from National Geographic, complete with fold-lines, pinned to a dingy-looking bulletin board. The map sports a collection of pushpins inserted over every major metropolitan area in the United States, conveying the impression of a wide-ranging, national company. And yet, this office has no company literature of any kind to be found anywhere. Nor is there a logo to be seen.

The receptionist has you fill out an application. Fair enough. When you finish that, you give it back to her and ask to use the rest room. She directs you to the “girl’s room”, because “the boy’s room is broken”. (Those are exact words. You note “girls” and “boys”, not “women” and “men”.) So you obediently use the women’s room, noting that (a) the fluorescent light does not turn on all the way, but merely flickers at half-light; (b) there is no toilet paper; (c) there are no paper towels; (d) the hand-sink has no soap. You finish your business and go back to the waiting and reception area. where you sit and await your 1:00 interview, for which you were on time although it is now 1:10.

While passing the time between 1:10 and 1:25, you observe the arrival of five other people to fill out applications for open positions. Busy place to be doing all this hiring, and sure enough, the receptionist takes a lot of phone calls from people apparently answering the ad in yesterday’s paper. (You had answered an ad two weeks prior.) The receptionist answers a LOT of these calls, and only later do you realize that in the roughly 30 minutes you were in her company not once did she field a call from a customer of whatever company this is.

So, the boss-guy finally comes out and greets you for the interview, apologizing for the 25 minute wait and claiming it’s because of his heavy interview schedule that day — which is odd because (a) you have noticed no one leaving his office, and (b) he later confirms this by informing you that you are in fact his first interview of the day. Ever the professional, you don’t give the obvious rejoinder that he is off to a great start, even though it is painfully obvious that he is at least six years younger than you. (This, too, is later directly confirmed.) He takes you into his office, where you again notice the complete lack of personal items on the desk. He does have a picture of Derek Jeter on his wall, but this does not necessarily imply that he’s a Yankees fan, because said picture has one of those inspirational business-world slogans that are all the rage these days. What’s more, his desk doesn’t have a computer either, and you’re wondering just what kind of business this guy is running with no computers at all.

During the interview, you are never asked a single question about your background or work experience, other than the standard “I see you’ve worked at X, Y and Z companies.” No “What did you like best about those companies”; no “Tell me about your responsibilities”; no “Tell me about a problem you faced and solved”. Then you get to hear the boss-guy’s background, which involves him buying his favorite college bar, running it for three years and eventually selling it, and then joining this company, the name of which he still has not said. The only reason you know it is because you read it on the door coming in. The receptionist doesn’t even use it when answering the phone.

The interview process, as described by boss-guy, involves a preliminary interview — that’s today’s interview — followed by a second round with the “top candidates”. This seems perfectly normal, although you wonder how much of an impression he’s forming given that he is not asking any questions. But then he describes that the second round involves candidates coming back in to spend an entire day on the job with this guy, essentially performing job duties so that he can decide who he wants to hire permanently. This strikes you, a former manager who is no stranger to staffing and selection processes, as very odd. After all, when hiring a server at a restaurant you managed, you never brought a potential candidate in to wait tables for a day before hiring him/her.

So you leave after ten minutes of being talked to by this guy, and he seems perfectly pleasant and nice….but you still have little idea of what the job entails. At no point has he mentioned things like wages, hours required, duties…he does indicate that all the people now flooding the reception area are prospects for his warehouse positions, which is further confusing because this place is certainly no warehouse. It’s a run-down office suite with exactly one office apparently in use.

So you leave, sit in your car for a moment basking in the warm air issuing from the heat vents (which after 45 minutes is still warmer than the air inside the office suite), marveling over the surreal job interview you’ve just experienced. Then you shake your head and drive off, a bit flummoxed and thinking of that scene in “The Fugitive” where Tommy Lee Jones gets annoyed over someone’s use of the word “hinky”.

And you certainly don’t hold your breath waiting for the call for your “trial day”.

Share This Post

Untitled Post

I don’t know why I’ve got all this stuck in my head today, but here’s another bit of goofiness from the Syracuse NBC affiliate’s morning news program. You know how most metropolitan areas, if not all of them, will include on their morning news a traffic segment so they can relate where trouble spots are on the local highways and such? Very useful, yes.

What’s weird about this one is that, for reasons passing understanding, the guy who does the traffic reports here broadcasts them from his office. He’s actually sitting at his paper-covered desk, looking into the camera and talking about the volume in I-690 and such. Is the newsdesk too small to accomodate this guy for his thirty seconds or so of on-air time?

Share This Post

Untitled Post

Signs that the guy on TV is not listening to what is actually being said by the person to whom he is speaking, as heard this morning on Syracuse’s NBC affiliate:

Dramatis Personae: The TV Weatherman, and some woman who just won the station’s daily contest and is on the phone.

Weatherman: Hi! You’ve just won the contest! So what do you do?

Woman who’s won the contest: I am a stay-at-home mom.

Weatherman: Do you have kids?

Anchorwoman sitting nearby, politely listening: Uhhhhh….I think she said….

Weatherman: Oh….um….congratulations on winning! (valiantly tries to avoid turning red, but fails)

This is the same weatherman who a few weeks ago, during a weather segment, stepped off-camera while saying, “I’m going to step off-camera now so you folks at home don’t see me scratching my nose, because it’s really itchy today.” And this is the same guy who, a few weeks before that, said on-air, “I don’t really believe all that stuff about global warming.”

The scary part? His forecasts are generally accurate.

Share This Post

Untitled Post

Just a reminder: one week from tomorrow, the first round of the James Bond film score reissues will be out. The big release here is the almost-complete score to On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, but all of these releases are great news.

The second round of reissues hits on February 25. The big one there will be You Only Live Twice, which features some of the most achingly beautiful scoring John Barry ever did, for any movie.

Share This Post

Untitled Post

Sheila Viehl will be doing something interesting: allowing aspiring writers to follow in detail the process of writing a book, from pitching the idea to the editor to the actual writing and beyond. She hasn’t ironed out the kinks yet, and it will probably take the form of a private e-mail loop, and she’ll probably be limiting it to actual aspiring writers, but anyone interested should keep an eye on StarLines for updates.

(I probably won’t participate because I’ve got about 9,344 other things going on right now. But it sounds worthwhile.)

Share This Post

Untitled Post

Only Entertainment Weekly could take something as fun as debating the best Simpsons episodes ever and shoot it full of annoying critic-speak (is “didacticism” even a word?). And they omit my personal faves: the one where Homer joins the Stonecutters; the wickedly funny X-Files parody ep; the even funnier — and wickeder — Mary Poppins sendup, “Sherry Bobbins”; and the one where Homer takes over the Pee-wee football team. (Bart: “Dad, I’ve got some bad news.” Homer: “Awww, your mother isn’t pregnant, is she?”) Oh well, the article is amusing enough, EW‘s annoying writing aside.

The worst Simpsons episode? Hmmmm….there was one where Homer sets up a webpage, which then leads into an unsuccessful parody of the cult-show The Prisoner; Barney Gumble’s realization that he’s an alcoholic seems strange for a show that once did an episode with the moral “To alcohol: the cause of, and solution to, life’s problems”…but worst of all is the one where Maude Flanders dies. Ugh.

Share This Post

Untitled Post

Kevin Drum asks of a number of seminal events in recent history: Where were you when they happened?

In order:

:: Nixon’s resignation. I was one month shy of my fourth birthday; the earliest I recall even knowing there was a person called “The President” was in 1976, when our teacher told us about the election that year. Thus, I was pretty much totally unaware of Nixon. (A funny story in my family is that my sister, who was in second grade in 1972, managed to get her classmates so riled up by badmouthing Nixon — my parents supported McGovern, and to this day are proud to have done so — that the teacher had to call off the class’s mock election.)

:: President Reagan’s shooting. I was in a fourth-grade classroom when my teacher walked in and told us what had happened. I don’t recall the time of day, but the event was still so fresh that she informed us that “the President’s press secretary” had been killed. (James Brady was seriously wounded, but not killed as was originally reported.)

:: Challenger. I must be the only person I know who didn’t see any footage of this event in school. One of my classmates told me about it in the hall between classes. (He was laughing, which is perfectly in character because he was, well, an ass.) I didn’t see the coverage until I got home around 4:00.

:: The OJ Simpson verdict. I was in a training class with the company I worked for at the time, in a conference room in another town. Someone slipped down the hall into another office during a coffee break to find out what the verdict was. (I’ve often wondered if that court reporter, the one who read the verdict, is ever annoyed that her “big moment in history” has been recorded with her stumbling on the pronunciation of “Orenthal”.)

:: 9-11-01. I was in my car, driving to work, listening to NPR’s Morning Edition. The event was still so fresh that Bob Edwards had not even broken into the show’s regular features for the day at that time, although he had done so by the time I got to work. I remember someone speculating that LaGuardia’s radar-guidance systems had gone horribly awry, and I remember my thoughts turning to the premiere episode of The Lone Gunmen, the spin-off television series from The X-Files. In that episode a government plot to smash a jetliner into the World Trade Center is averted. (Even though the show only lasted a single season, I wonder if that episode will ever see the light of day again.) Like the Challenger disaster, I saw no footage of this event until I got home later that day, as our office had no television. One of my coworkers went to a previously-arranged lunch meeting with a client at Applebees, and she came back in the afternoon to tell us how horrific it all was. In the morning, our work day began at 9:30 am, so when we all arrived at work the Twin Towers were both burning. We got a slightly later start than usual, with a moment of silence, and then we began our work (but kept the radio on). Just when the awful reality of what had happened was only beginning to set in…the radio announcer broke in with news of the strike on the Pentagon. The job I had at the time was a telesales job, and I recall the instructions coming from our managers: “Do not call accounts in New York City; for the foreseeable future we cannot ship via next-day air.”

:: Columbia. I had just got our daughter out of bed and was turning on the TV so she could watch cartoons, and I noticed a news anchor on ABC, which struck me as odd since there generally is no news coverage going on at that time of morning. I channel-flipped to CBS and saw a talking head there as well, and thus knew that something was up; then I saw the CBS headline, “Contact lost with space shuttle”.

Kevin wonders why we always seem to wonder why we remember the bad events but not the good ones; I do remember some good ones, but by and large he’s right: it’s the horrible events that sear into our consciousness.

:: Princess Diana’s wedding. I actually remember watching this, because my mother has a long-standing fascination with the British Royal Family.

:: Princess Diana’s death. I was working the night shift at the restaurant; it was close to midnight when my wife called and told me what had happened.

:: Oklahoma City. Another phone call from the wife, but during the day shift.

:: The release of the hostages in 1981. Fourth grade; we had the classroom television on so we could watch the inauguration of President Reagan. Cheers broke out as soon as the announcer broke in and announced the hostages’ departure from Iran.

:: Three Mile Island. I don’t recall the exact breaking-out of this event, but I recall clearly the incredible tension on the news each evening. We lived in West Virginia at the time, about a three-hour drive from TMI.

:: The fall of the Berlin Wall. I genuinely don’t recall where I was, but it was a month or two into my freshman year in college. I seem to recall it was Music Theory class, but I could be wrong on that point.

:: John Lennon’s murder. The news of this was on Good Morning America as I got ready for school.

:: Frank Sinatra’s death. I couldn’t sleep, so I got up and went to the living room to watch some TV for a bit. When I channel-flipped by CNN, I caught them in the middle of one of those “life retrospectives” of the sort that are only done upon the passing of a significant person.

Share This Post

Untitled Post

Twenty-two years ago or so, I sat amongst my fifth-grade classmates and watched, on television, the maiden voyage of a spacecraft.

This morning, I sat with my three-year-old daughter and watched that ship’s final landing.

This was no automated spaceprobe, vanishing into the interplanetary vapors just as it’s supposed to be entering Mars orbit; nor was it an old, outdated communications satellite no longer used by a company that no longer even exists being allowed to burn up in the upper atmosphere without so much as a notice for the general public. This was a spaceship, containing live astronauts — people for whom the sense of wonder and adventure and exploration of space travel far, far outweighed the ever-distinct possibilities that they might not survive the trip. Today, even as the forces of war muster and as our earthly concerns consume our attention, we mourn seven people who flew with the spirit of Magellan and Erickson and Columbus and Armstrong and who, in doing so, joined the spirits of Grissom and Chaffee and Resnik and McAuliffe.

I pray that in days to come we do not seriously entertain the notion that to reach for the stars is too dangerous an enterprise. I pray that we do not allow three years of investigations and bureaucratic wranglings pass by before we once again take to the heavens. I pray that, faced with the lessons of this terrible event, we do not embrace the fears made all the more real by what happened today but rather take our inspiration from the seven souls lost.

We have to investigate what happened. We have to know why Columbia failed as it did. We have to know what we can do to make our future flights successful. But we must not decide not to undertake any more flights. I envision all the ships littering the floors of all the seas, and yet still we sail. I envision footprints upon the Sea of Tranquility, waiting to be joined; I envision Olympus Mons, waiting to be climbed. And I envision the Voyager craft, carrying evidence of our lonely little species out beyond the Sun’s gravity and into interstellar space.

It will be hard, and our first launches in the future will be tempered anew by our freshened fears of the possible fates awaiting those astronauts. But we must keep going into space. As Alfred Bester might say, “The stars, our destination.”

In Memoriam:

Rick Husband

William McCool

Michael Anderson

Kalpana Chawla

David Brown

Laurel Clark

Ilan Ramon

Roll on, Columbia, roll on.

Share This Post