Fading Into Memory

The first major historical event of my lifetime was probably the resignation of President Nixon. I was just shy of three years old when that happened, and I have utterly no memory of it. In fact, I have no memory of President Ford, either. The first historical figure of whom I have any distinct memory is President Carter. Thus, the first five years of history through which I lived does not exist for me as memory. They’re just pages in the history books, no less so because I lived through them than they are for my daughter who did not.

And for her, 9-11-01 will be the same way. I’ll be able to describe to her the incredible sadness of that day; I’ll be able to tell her where I was when I heard the news begin to unfold; I’ll be able to relate how the news got worse and worse and worse. I’ll be able to tell her how, for three days afterward, the skies were clear and unbroken by jet-plane contrails as air traffic was halted. I’ll be able to tell her about Buffalo firemen standing in every intersection, taking donations for their brethren in NYC. All that and more, I’ll be able to tell her. But it will never be as real for her as it was and is for me. For her, it will be like the Kennedy assassination or Nixon resignation are for me, and how Pearl Harbor was for my parents (Dad was two, Mom was four months).

We tell ourselves that we must never forget, that we must keep the pain real, that we must never allow those terrible moments to recede into history like everything else. But we fool ourselves if we think we can. September 11, 2001 is already receding into history, faster than we realize. And I believe that this is as it should be.

There have been so many horrible days in our nation’s history, days when the darkness seemed ready to overwhelm us and threaten the very fabric of our nation. Each time, America has moved on, incorporating the bad days into the tapestry of its history. There will come a time when September 11, 2001 will be just another seminal event in history, more known than remembered. And it won’t be a hundred years from now. It’s already starting.

I’ve seen some complaints, online and off, that we aren’t doing enough to mark the occasion. Perhaps it’s unseemly to many that NBC should air reruns of its Thursday night lineup on such a momentous day, and in truth, it does seem odd to me that not a single prime-time special is devoted to the 9-11-01 anniversary, even though I don’t believe that all three networks should devote their entire schedules to it. If this year’s observance is less-than-satisfying, I’m still one who found last year’s “All 9-11, all the time” approach, even in the days preceding the actual date, to be simply too much. I suppose that I no longer wish to partake in public mourning; and it does not strike me as particularly healthy to try each year to recapture or regenerate the anger and shock and desperation of that day.

For myself, I plan to do much as I did last year. I’ll read some American poetry, listen to some American music, and perhaps watch an American movie or an American television show. It just seems right to me to take a bit of time to reflect on American cultural artifacts tomorrow, since it was not just America but American culture that was attacked two years ago. That is how I choose to remember and honor those who died: by reminding myself that America is still here, that our contributions to the world and our species are real, and that they will last far, far longer than Osama Bin Laden’s hatred ever possibly can – – even if he crashes a thousand planes into our thousand tallest buildings.

There is more sanctity – – true sanctity, that which celebrates beauty in the face of a harsh world and an unforgiving universe – – in a Gene Kelly dance number, in a Frank Lloyd Wright building, in a Lerner-and-Loewe song, in the taste of a grilled hot dog, in the crack of a baseball bat, in the spiral of a perfectly-thrown football, and in a Robert Heinlein short story than there are in the hearts of a million terrorists who are prepared to immolate themselves and a thousand innocents in the name of a hating God.

Share This Post

Cool, but does it make a nice cup of coffee?

I’ve obviously been noodling around a bit with the new Blogger features, mainly concentrating on titles. Now I can title my posts, just like all the Cool Kids with their Movable Type blogs. Of course, figuring out how to get them to show up was a bit of a pain, as the “New Features” page didn’t exactly point the way to any directions, so I had to do some searching before I finally found the necessary Blogger tags to make the titles actually show on the blog itself. I also tried them with a number of different styles and font-sizes, and I’ve settled (for now) on the current appearance.

I’m also interested in the “Change Time and Date” feature, so if I have a post that I want to appear on a certain date I can do that, I think. But the explanation here is very spotty. If I do this — say, if I write a post on November 6 but change its date to November 9, will it automatically appear on November 9 when someone loads the page, or will publishing be required on the 9th to make the thing appear? This is a feature I’d like to use, but there’s no explanation anywhere that I can find as to just how it works. If anyone can answer this, let me know.

Once again, I see no compelling reason to make the switch over to Movable Type yet. Blogger has its hiccups of functionality, but as I see it, they really are working to make things better. I suspect I’ll keep using Blogger until it significantly falls off in quality. I would, though, like to move eventually to a non-Blogspot server with my own registered domain name, but that’s a way off.

Anyway, some of this new stuff looks pretty cool, and some of it I doubt I’ll use. That’s usually the way it goes, though.

Share This Post

WARNING: Political Anger Ahead.

During the rush to war, it was my greatest fear that we’d muck up the aftermath by executing the rebuilding of Iraq in half-assed fashion. I’ve tried to not be discouraged by what appears, every day, to be a giant lack of planning on the part of people who seem to have genuinely expected a warm and wonderful welcome once Saddam was killed driven into hiding. I’ve tried consoling myself with the “It takes a while to rebuild a county, so give us time” meme. I’ve tried giving the President and his Administration, if not exactly the benefit of the doubt, at least a granting of the possibility that they might do it right in the end.

Well, not anymore.

Not when the Administration has to admit that its funding request for Iraqi reconstruction is $55 billion short, just one day after the President made his request for $87 billion on national television. Not when Donald Rumsfeld, Mr. “Our critics are the ones making danger”, is saying things like “”I don’t believe it’s our job to reconstruct the country.” Not when he’s claiming that what’s needed is not more, but fewer, troops. Not when, in not one but two wars now, “Blow it up and then get the hell out of Dodge” seems to be the Admistration’s general approach.

These aren’t the grownups, and they’re not in charge. They’re children, and they’re behaving like a bunch of kids with unlimited access to someone else’s toys.

Share This Post

Untitled Post

Remember that episode of The Brady Bunch when Mike and the boys build a special clubhouse in the backyard for the girls? Mike instructs Bobby to go get some nails, which he does. Later on, when the girls’ clubhouse is done, suddenly the boys’ clubhouse collapses in a heap of lumber. Greg turns to Bobby and says, “When Dad told you to go find some nails, where did you get them?” And Bobby replies, “I took them out of there,” pointing to the now-collapsed boys’ clubhouse.

Well, apparently Bobby Brady now works for NASA. Check out the pictures. I especially like the two dudes standing nearby in the universal “Crap, I hope that’s not my fault” pose.

(Via Teresa Nielsen Hayden, who is on a tear right now. If you’re not reading her blog, you’re missing out. And on The Brady Bunch, whatever happened to the clubhouses, anyway? You never see them again. Did Mike get pissed and tear them down on the spot?)

Share This Post

Untitled Post

[TINFOIL]

The martini-swirling Mr. Harris sums up the airport-security screening thing that will, if enacted as-is, simply refuse to allow up to four million people access to air travel, whether they are in any position to actually threaten a plane or not. And a lot of folks see this as an unacceptable policy that is reminiscent of a police state.

But, it occurs to me that this might be a nefarious scheme to save AMTRAK!!!

Just think: those people denied permission to fly have to travel some way, right? This will increase Amtrak’s customer base in one fell swoop! What a masterstroke!

[/TINFOIL]

Share This Post

Untitled Post

I don’t know how big of a ripple-effect this will have on publishing, but the e-book has suffered what looks to me like a pretty big setback: Barnes&Noble has stopped selling them.

My view, based on not a lot outside of sheer guesswork, is that e-books won’t really become viable until handheld technology is a lot more widespread than it is now. It’ll get there, I think, but for now, e-books have been a product without a real market.

Share This Post

Untitled Post

I’m starting to wonder if Gregg Easterbrook has lost his grip on reality, or if his habit of reusing clever puns and verbal constructions until they are no longer clever is now melding with a bizarre tendency to fixate on things that just aren’t true. This has cropped up in his obsession with Senator Hillary Clinton’s byline on books, and now it’s cropping up again with respect to the Buffalo Bills’ uniforms. I don’t mind that he thinks they’re ugly. While I like the home uniform, I don’t care for the road version much. But Easterbrook keeps on insisting that the Bills have done away with red, white and blue. Funny, because the Bills’ official team website says this about the new uniforms:

The traditional red, white and blue color scheme that has been part of the Bills look since 1962 remains but has been intensified with the addition of a darker blue. The team’s red helmet with a blue charging buffalo on the side has also been maintained but has been modified to include nickel gray and navy stripes. In another nod to tradition, the nickel gray of the 1960-61 Bills returns as a subtle enhancement on the helmet as well as the jersey and pants.

Maybe Easterbrook is of the belief that “red, white and blue” only includes one specific shade of blue, but that seems like hair-splitting to me. They darkened the blue, but it’s still noticeably blue. Their pants are still white. Red is still evident in their helmets, stripes on the pants, and the side-panel of the jerseys. I’m not sure which color Easterbrook is referring when he talks about “Rusting Russian Dreadnought color” or whatever; is that the gray that’s only used as trim?

Time was when I really looked forward to Easterbrook’s columns, but the guy is sinking, fast. Maybe a Russian dreadnought can pluck him from the sea before he drowns.

(And when he mentions red, white and blue as the “most successful color scheme in history”, I wonder if he’s including Britain and France.)

Kevin Drum also comments today on Easterbrook’s tendency to ignore the obvious in favor of whatever point Easterbrook wishes to pound into the ground, this time in a case where Easterbrook sees “anti-Christian bias” in the news media that is actually much better explained from the simple standpoint of the ratings-game. That’s an important point that gets lost a lot of the time: when “What is Christian” and “What sells” happen to not be the same thing (by whichever measure of “What is Christian”), it seems a bit disingenuous to conclude bias when the media or the market gravitates toward “What sells”. This seems something that Gregg Easterbrook should know.

And finally, as long as I’m flogging Easterbrook, I might as well point out this whopper of a quote, when he compares Dennis Miller’s stint on Monday Night Football to Rush Limbaugh’s current appearances on NFL Countdown: “Note that their respective politics roughly cancel each other out, leaving a net of Pat Summerall.” It certainly seems that Easterbrook hasn’t been paying much attention to Miller lately…

Share This Post

Untitled Post

These days, it seems like nary a day passes without some me finding some reminder of the old joke about how when my ship comes in, I’ll be standing at the train station. I’m trying to get my writing career going, with spectacularly little success – – and here’s this Jim Caple guy, first being paid by ESPN to visit fifteen major-league ballparks and write about them (another ESPN writer did the other fifteen), and now he’s being paid by ESPN to travel the length of the mighty Mississippi looking for offbeat sports-stories from the heartland and our greatest river.

I’m just not living right.

(Oh, and the lucky SOB actually got to run in the Milwaukee Brewers sausage race! Ach, I hate him so much….)

Share This Post