They’re PAID to write that stuff?

Via James Capozzola, I see that the folks at National Review have something going on called a “Gibbeting List” — people they hate from history who we’d have dug up and their moldering corpses displayed in iron gibbets. And not just actual evil people, but people whose only crimes seem to have been espousing different beliefs than these folks. OK, then.

I quite frankly do not know what to make of people who apparently think that Lyndon Johnson and the dictators of the Soviet Union are of equal moral worth. But I’m having trouble making sense of a lot of stuff lately.

Share This Post

Geez, I wonder if Ralph Fiennes isn’t really a Nazi?

What on Earth is the big deal about Patrick Stewart not being all that enthusiastic about space exploration? When did we begin expecting actors to believe whatever we think their characters believed? Take Lileks, for example: driven to the usual dull-as-ditchwater crap in which “My God, an actor dares to believe something different than I! The Horror!” somehow becomes “How dare an actor open his mouth to do anything other than recite dialogue!”

But Lileks gets even worse: he’s shocked to hear such things not just from an actor who had the unmitigated gall to play a science fiction hero, but an Englishman besides! Oh, no!

God, what an ass. “Boo-hoo, the guy who played my favorite SF character doesn’t hold the same set of beliefs that I do.” Get over it, already. Just keep writing boring crap about Target. And to think, on space travel I agree with Lileks and not with Stewart. Kind of reminds me of an exchange in Seven Brides for Seven Brothers:

GIDEON: Adam’s right. I stand with Adam.

ADAM: Well, don’t stand too close.

(By the way, Stewart’s stance on this is not new. I heard him espouse this view in an interview at least ten years ago. And James, no, I do not think that Democratic Underground would feature that picture. Not much of a rhetorical flourish, though — I don’t recall seeing the picture you’re obliquely referencing on too many sites like NewsMax or in Town Hall columns, so your “Let me make up a dumb hypothetical to accuse people of dishonesty before the fact” thought-experiment pretty much fails.)

Share This Post

Traffic and Loading Stuff

For some reason, I am still getting tons of traffic from MSN’s search engine for anything and everything related to Janet Jackson and the Nipple That Ate Mars. I wonder if Janet’s new nickname among friends and coworkers is “Nip”, a la Elaine in the episode of Seinfeld in which her nipple is visible in her Christmas card photo.

And I’ve noticed that the blog is taking quite some time to load. BlogRolling is, I think, the main culprit; looking at their news page, I see that they have had to do some maintenance to accomodate very heavy server demand. If BlogRolling and YACCS are both down at the same time, then loading will be positively glacial.

Share This Post

Samples? WHERE?!

Never have I seen so flummoxed a person as the old man at the store today who was trying to decide if his desire to get a free sample of pan-seared pork chops was stronger than his desire to not step in the four-feet-in-diameter pool of extra virgin olive oil I was just starting to clean up.

The desire for samples won out.

And he wasn’t the last person to make that same decision.

There’s a lesson here, somewhere. I know not what it is, but I’ll be it’s a doozy.

Share This Post

Holy Search Results, Batman….

Well, the whole “Janet Jackson Exposure Boob Super Bowl” thing has been great for my traffic the last few days; I’m getting tons of hits off Google and MSN searches for stuff about “the incident”. (I’ve also has a ton of hits from people looking for information about a similar incident that took place at the “Supper Bowl”, which I guess would be Snoopy’s food dish.)

Anyway, blogging will probably be light for the next few days as the new job takes up a lot of my mental bandwidth. I’m not disappearing, though, so you all will have to keep visiting.

Share This Post

Do we even HAVE priorities?

Time it took, after the related incident, to start this government investigation: two days.

Time it took, after the related incident, to start this government investigation: six to eight months and counting, depending on where you start counting from.

Time it took, after the related incident, to start this government investigation: one year, two months, sixteen days.

There are times when I feel like our country is Springfield-writ-large, and we’re being governed by Mayor Quimby and Police Chief Clancy Wiggum.

Share This Post

What’s that strange gyrating-sound coming from Dr. Sagan’s grave?

Yes, that whole Jayson Blair thing was pretty damning, but as far as I’m concerned, the New York Times has done far greater damage to its legacy of quality journalism by posting this astrological look at the Democratic presidential candidates. What vomitous claptrap.

(NYT registration required, if you really want to read this tripe. Link via PZ Myers, who is equally annoyed. Probably moreso, since he’s actually a paid scientist and I’m just a blogger who gets annoyed at pseudoscientific stupidity.)

Share This Post

An Unholy Trilogy

The Good: Last weekend, NBC aired Deep Impact.

The Bad: The next night, ABC aired Armageddon.

The Ugly: This past Saturday night, one of Buffalo’s indie-stations aired the 1979 crapfest Meteor.

I wonder if they’re trying to tell me something….

Share This Post