Aslan is on the move

We watched The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe last night.

It’s a good movie. Very good, actually. So I feel kind of bad that I’m now going to rip on it for not being as good as The Lord of the Rings.

I am not an expert on the Narnia books at all. In fact, I haven’t even read them. The only one I’ve read is, appropriately enough, Lion, Witch, and Wardrobe; but even that wasn’t of much use, since it’s been literally twenty-five years since I read it. This was another of those “Kid, you’re being annoying, so here’s a book that you’re to read and not say a word until you’re done with it” volumes forced upon me by my mother. She gave it to me while we were on the road as a family, literally: we were moving from Portland, OR to Western New York in early summer of 1981. I was riding in our Ryder truck with my father, while my sister rode in our pickup truck with the camper in tow behind it. We were about halfway across the country — somewhere in Nebraska, I believe — when Mom gave me the book, and I read it in a single day, finishing up as we arrived at a Holiday Inn somewhere near Gary, IN.

Sadly, my mother didn’t figure that I would read the book in one day, so she didn’t keep any of the subsequent volumes around when packing her “Not-quite-emergency stuff, but stuff we might wanna have around anyway” box. No matter, though — I tried a number of times over the next couple of years to read whatever the next book was (Prince Caspian, or Voyage of the Dawn Treader), and I just was never able to get back into the series again. I’ll try again someday soon, however: last fall I bought a single-volume omnibus of the Narnia series.

(On a side note, just to place things in their proper place in my literary life, a week or so before my mother gave me Lion, Witch and Wardrobe, she had also made me read The Book of Three by Lloyd Alexander, which is the first book in the Prydain Chronicles. There, too, she failed to keep the second book, The Black Cauldron, available; but unlike Narnia, I was more than able to finish that series, reading all five and the handful of extraneous stories Alexander wrote in that same summer. I would read The Hobbit a year later, and The Lord of the Rings a year after that — but only after reading Stephen R. Donaldson’s The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever in between. Oh, and somewhere in there, Mom also infected me with John Bellairs. In a sense, my whole reading life since then has been an attempt to rediscover the sense of discovery I enjoyed in those two years between the ages of ten and twelve. I guess my own “Golden Age” of speculative fiction came a little early.)

Anyhow, back the movie of Narnia. It really is good. I honestly can’t be sure how faithful it is to the original material, but it feels pretty close, although I’m pretty sure CS Lewis didn’t open up with a harrowing scene depicting the bombing of London. To be honest, that entire scene felt dreadfully out of place to me, and because of it, I felt like the movie took longer to set in that it should have.

So the kids are packed up and sent off to live in countryside England (the Shire, perhaps?), where they have another round of brief adventures before Lucy finally discovers the enchanted wardrobe and the world it “contains”. All this prologue stuff is necessary, I suppose, to establish certain bits of character on the part of the kids: Lucy’s the adventurous one, Susan’s the cautious one, Peter’s the “stiff upper lip, lads!” one, and Edmund’s the rebellious and easily tempted one. (We are, of course, forever indebted to Lewis that he didn’t just go ahead and name Edmund “Judas”, but more on that later.)

Even though all this prologue helps to establish who our characters are, it all has this weird, almost unnecessary feel to it, and about five minutes into it, I’m thinking, “OK, I get it. Let’s get going here.” I’m not adverse to stories that take their time unfolding, but this movie didn’t feel slow in unfolding, but rather hesitant in unfolding. Here’s a bit of story, but now we’re going to pull back and meander a bit; now here’s another bit of story, but now we’re going to pull back again; and still yet again. The movie doesn’t feel comfortable in its own skin for something close to half an hour, and maybe more, when all the kids finally go to Narnia.

And then — well, I won’t summarize the whole thing here. As always, the best way to find out what happens in a movie is to see the movie, which I recommend, anyway.

For all the wonderments of the Lord of the Rings movies (and really, I don’t think I’m likely to see that much wonderment on the movie screen at once again in my lifetime), one thing that niggled at me in each film was that once in a while Middle Earth felt too small. Not always, mind you; for the most part, Peter Jackson was pretty good about suggesting the vastness of Middle Earth. But once in a while he frankly dropped the ball in that regard, making everything seem like it was within an easy day’s ride of everything else. (And to be bluntly honest, this same flaw afflicts the Star Wars movies, when we really consider the timelines and events involved therein.) Just to give one example, one scene in The Two Towers that always bugs me has Captain Faramir’s second-in-command (I can’t remember his name) bringing him a map and briefing him on everything that’s going on, even as it’s happening: “Our scouts report that Theoden is making for Helm’s Deep, but Saruman is about to attack him there.” And I’m wondering, absent a palantir or the services of the Great Eagles or Shadowfax, how on Earth did that scout get that information from Helm’s Deep to Ithilien that fast? And one thing for which I really value the Extended Edition of The Return of the King is that the film’s theatrical cut makes it seem as though Mount Doom is about a mile and a half from Cirith Ungol.

This problem, though, really prevails in Narnia, which frankly feels about as large as Walt Disney World and, until the film’s final act, seems to be populated by about a dozen beings of various sort. A few attempts are made to convey scale, but these mostly involve throwaway shots of wide vistas that are surmounted in mere minutes. (And I have to cry foul, to a certain extent, on the very first scenes set in Narnia: that winter-shrouded forest just screams out “forest set on a soundstage with fake snow”). And in that third act, when we finally meet the cast of hundreds that form the armies of Aslan and the White Queen, I’m wondering, “Where did all these folks come from?” And even that final battle lacks a sense of major scale.

And then there’s the Christian allegory element of the story.

I have no problem with any of this, per se, except that it all feels fairly perfunctory. Maybe it worked better in the book, and when I read it I’ll be able to report back on this, but in the film, I felt as though Aslan’s Christ-like nature just came out of nowhere (even though I knew it was coming). I suspect that the filmmakers had to leave some backstory out, which is why the slaying of Aslan doesn’t work quite so well in the movie: all of a sudden, here’s the Queen and Aslan talking about “the deep magic” and whatnot. Aslan’s act of self-sacrifice is explained, but the rationale for why there has to be a sacrifice at all is given the tiniest lip-service. I got the feeling that something of Lewis’s mythological underpinning to Narnia got omitted from the film, perhaps for reasons of running time. For all the ink that was spilled around the time of the film’s theatrical release about its Christian allegory content, upon seeing the movie last night I was left wanting more of that, not less. What’s there just doesn’t feel like enough, and I’m not saying that as a Christian. I’m saying that as a lover of story who felt that a deeper aspect of this particular story was given short shrift. I don’t care if your tale springs from a Christian, or Jewish, or Vedic, or Icelandic skaldic wellspring, but if it does, don’t do it halfway.

Visually, I found the film a mixed bag of influences. The talking animals and various makeup effects all worked extremely well, and that was easily the best part of the whole production. And frankly, that would easily have been the easiest part of a movie like this to get wrong (and if you don’t believe me, go look at this, swallowing any liquids you may be ingesting before you do). I loved the chemistry between Mr. and Mrs. Beaver, and the White Queen’s look is pitch perfect — especially at the end, when she strikes one of the most fearsome poses I’ve ever seen in a movie villain. (Seriously, that pose of hers as she drives her chariot into battle might be iconic.) I liked how the filmmakers, seeing that Lewis’s world involves less sophisticated worldbuilding than Tolkien’s, mostly opt for a color scheme of bold primary colors. I did think that Aslan, although perfectly animated, should have been physically larger. And frankly, I loved the Minotaur.

I do question the making of the English countryside to be this idyllic, warm, sunny place. (Maybe Lewis had it this way in the book, though.) And I couldn’t help but watch the brief scenes of the train going from London to the English countryside and wonder if the filmmakers realized that their train looks exactly like the Hogwarts Express. I’m almost certain this was a cinematic in-joke.

What else to say about the film? I thought the film was cast very well: the four kids were all excellent, and the film’s numerous voice actors were great. The music score was just OK, though. Film music fans keep telling me that Harry Gregson-Williams is a talent to reckon with and the best thing to come out of Hans Zimmer’s “Media Ventures” stable of cookie-cutter composers, but I’m just not hearing it. Gregson-Williams’s effort for Narnia is your standard Big Epic Sword Fantasy kind of a score, but its level of sophistication is nowhere near to what Howard Shore accomplished for The Lord of the Rings — just a couple of big themes that pound out in the big scenes, none of which are especially memorable. And the damn pop songs on the End Credits were especially grating. The music is just generic, which is disappointing but hardly unexpected these days. This would have been a perfect film for a James Newton Howard or a Gabriel Yared. (If you doubt me on Yared, track down his rejected score for Troy. That guy’s got some epic-scoring chops.)

Narnia, despite my misgivings noted above, is a good movie, and further evidence that we’re experiencing some kind of high point in fantasy these days. Fantasy readers are always complaining about the state of the genre, but we’ve come a long way from twenty years ago when all the books were Tolkien clones and the rare fantasy movie was some kind of crap like Legend or Krull. The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe may not have been perfect — but I’m still going to be there when Prince Caspian opens.

Share This Post

Geez, who left this blog here? It’s all dusty and stuff.

Sorry about the lack of posting this week, folks, but things have been fairly busy in the Real World lately, and this heightened level of activity combined with a backlog of materials to review for GMR and a very hectic weekend last week which had me starting this week off fairly tired already and the traditional uptick in maintenance work at The Store as Spring rolls round led to a blogger who found himself staring slackjawed at the monitor during “Bloggin’ Time” most of the time this week.

My plans for this weekend involve sleeping, watching a movie or two on the TeeVee, more sleeping, doing a bit of laundry, buying food, some more sleeping, drinking a bit of cola laced with spiced rum (if “spiced ham” is the idea behind “Spam”, shouldn’t “spiced rum” likewise reduce to “Spum”?), and the like. We’ll see if I can’t reawaken the little guys upstairs who actually determine in what order I strike the keys on my computer keyboard.

Share This Post

The 92nd Law of eBay Acquisition

If you purchase a trilogy of books on eBay, buying one volume of the trilogy each from three different sellers, Book One of said trilogy will be the last to arrive on your doorstep, even if the seller of Book One was the very first to send you an e-mail reading “I shipped your book today”.

Share This Post

DeLay-ing the inevitable

[WARNING: Unseemly political gloating here.]

Tom DeLay, then:

Tom DeLay, now:

Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

It strikes me that I found it nearly impossible to find a photo of DeLay actually frowning as he’s “forced” out of Congress. I’ll give the Devil his due here: the man is a mean bastard, but he certainly seems to enjoy it.

In the course of reading news about DeLay’s exit from Congress, I found a couple of telling quotes. First, from DeLay himself:

It was obvious to me that this election had become a referendum on me.

Well, no shit. Really. That’s what elections are: referenda on the people holding offices. Ultimately, though, DeLay turns out to be the most pathetic kind of loser: not just one who will do whatever it takes to win, but who also will only play the game if he’s guaranteed to win.

I also saw this, from current House Majority Leader John Boehner:

He has served our nation with integrity and honor, and I’m honored to call him my colleague and friend.

Integrity and honor. Well, in a party that seemingly defines “integrity” and “honor” as meaning “conservative who’s never received extramarital fellatio [at least within the last ten years, before which any such instances are filed under ‘youthful indiscretions’]”, I guess DeLay’s the poster boy for integrity and honor.

And I have to recollect once again the bold prognostication offered once upon a time by the “Republicans can do no wrong, EVER!” guys at Powerline, a little over a year ago:

Sorry, folks, but, like it or not, DeLay is the Majority Leader and likely to stay such for many years to come.

Ahhh, Powerline — the blog whose motto ought to be, “We get it right less often than even the most stopped of clocks!”

Share This Post

So long, Eric

BFLOBlog reports that Buffalo Bills receiver Eric Moulds has been traded to the Houston Texans. I always liked Moulds, and I’m sorry to see him go, although it’s been obvious that his salary has outstripped his value to the team. He’s on the downside.

For me, Moulds is a Don Mattingly kind of guy, in that he’s been the one indisputably good player on this team during a period of sustained mediocrity or downright badness. I don’t expect his luck to improve much in that train wreck of a franchise that exists in Houston, which is kind of a shame. I’d like to see Moulds end up as a champion somewhere (well, other than New England).

Share This Post

Angels and Stoners and Fruit Bats, oh my!

Last night I finished reading Christopher Moore’s novel The Stupidest Angel, which is a Christmas tale set in Moore’s little town of Pine Cove, California. It’s always hard to describe a Moore novel, plot-wise, since so much in his stories is based on pure absurdity, so I’ll just note that in this tale, an archangel comes to Pino Cove in order to perform a Christmas miracle. Trouble is, this particular angel is, as the title indicates, stupid. And stupid plus divine power equals…well, you’ll have to read the book to find out.

The problem with that is that I can’t recommend reading The Stupidest Angel unless one has also read the previous Moore novels Practical Demonkeeping, The Lust Lizard of Melancholy Cove, Island of the Sequined Love Nun and Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ’s Childhood Pal. The Stupidest Angel recycles characters from each of these novels.

Now, reading those books really isn’t essential to understanding what’s going on in Angel; the book does work, I suspect, as a standalone. However, there’s a “vibe” that the book takes on by virtue of my being familiar with the characters already. There’s a subtext, for example, in the somewhat antagonistic relationship between Theophilus Crowe and Tucker Case that one won’t realize if one hasn’t read the novels in which they appeared before. Not essential, as noted, but still pleasurable.

I found the ending of The Stupidest Angel fairly lackluster (especially in the new final chapter appended in a later edition of the book), as if Moore’s inspiration petered out just a bit. The book feels faintly self-indulgent, with all those characters coming back for more, but there’s more than enough Moore whackiness to compensate. This isn’t Moore’s best work, by any means, but it’s still a lot of fun to read. Self-indulgent exercise or no, you won’t find too many stories out there in which a drunken marine biologist bemoans his disastrous love life with a paraphrase of “The Little Drummer Boy”:

I have no sex appeal, pa rum-pum-pum pum.
My social skills are nil, pa rum-pum-pum pum.

Share This Post

Sentential Links #44

GAHHH! I was just happily collecting this week’s Sentential Links when Firefox crashed, and I lost the post. Damn it all! I had some good ones, too. I’ll try to remember the ones I picked, but I’ll probably miss one or two.

:: “Beaver in disloyalty kisses the drizzle’s price” (Huh?)

:: It’s too bad that teaching courtship/sex to young men is no longer a respectable occupation.

:: Indeed, DST is a huge pain in the ass for everyone. (Yeah, I hate DST too.)

:: At forty years and two months, I came to the birds.

:: So aside from slogans, what’s the Republican plan?

:: One of the reasons I write in this space is because I consider well crafted prose a form of art and refuse to adopt a blasé attitude as concerns my own writing.

Well, that’s it. I had more before, but then the post got scorched, and I need to do some other work. More next week.

Share This Post

“Oh my Gosh!”

That’s what stood out in my mind as I watched the trailer for the upcoming film United 93. At the moment the second plane hits the World Trade Center, a character utters the words “Oh my Gosh”. And she says the line in roughly the same tone one would use if one saw something mildly unusual, not something that I remember as being pretty horrific. But then, hey, maybe my memory’s faulty.

I just don’t know what to make of this movie. We don’t know what really transpired on Flight 93, but we sure know what we want to have transpired on Flight 93. The trailer is cut like the standard trailer for just about any action thriller that involves ordinary citizens placed into extraordinary circumstances — which is exactly the case with Flight 93, but the ending was not what was expected and I don’t see how it can be framed as such in a Hollywood movie.

I should probably reserve judgement for the actual film, since trailers are so notorious for not conveying accurately what a film is really like. But I don’t know how else to say it: this trailer left a bad taste in my mouth. I wish I could tell exactly why.

Share This Post