No, I don’t kill my pets.

For no real reason, here’s one of my favorite scenes ever from The West Wing. This is when President Bartlet decided to hire the whip-smart Republican woman who came out of nowhere to make Sam look like an idiot on national teevee:

I loved this scene, and it points out one of the show’s real flaws. Aaron Sorkin would create some wonderful characters and then underutilize them awfully. Ainsley Hayes was a terrific character who only appeared a handful of times after her introduction to the show. That was a shame — as was the fact that the show always had her in scenes with Sam afterwards, when in fact her best chemistry was with Leo. Oh well. I still love this scene — the repartee between Ainsley and Leo is just fantastic.

Share This Post

Don’t Eat the Snow in Hawaii

That’s the title of the very first episode ever of Magnum PI, which I saw Part One of last night, for the first time in…well, many moons. Watching favorite old teevee shows is, of course, an eternal pleasure, but particularly special are the pilot episodes of favorite shows. It’s always fun to see things in retrospect in the old pilots, from shows I know very well; noting the way characters interact at the outset before the show evolves, with the writers and producers learning what chemistries among the cast work best.

In “Don’t Eat the Snow in Hawaii”, the relationship between Magnum and Higgins is a lot more antagonistic than it would be later in the show’s run, owing to the fact that the pilot takes place early in their professional association, when neither man knows the other very well and certainly neither man takes the other particularly seriously. Magnum’s trademark narration of his adventures is present, but here it has a weird sound to it, with heavy reverb as though we’re listening to Magnum’s ghost. And the phrases he would use a lot later on in the show in his narrations — “I know what you’re thinking, and you’re right”, “When I write my book on how to be a world-class private investigator, I’ll include a chapter on….” — are not to be found. But other stuff — high-speed chases in the Ferrari, Magnum’s Viet Nam and Naval Intelligence history — are there from the get-go.

A word on the presentation of the show itself. Here in Buffalo, channel 2.3 — part of our local NBC affiliate’s trio of digital channels — airs “Retro TV”, which is just that: old teevee shows. Weeknights have been kind of fun this summer, with The A-Team and Magnum, PI airing each night. What has been kind of irritating, though, is that the channel is airing Magnum in no semblance of any kind of order. This always frustrates me. I tend to believe that when shows are aired in syndication, they need to be aired in the order they were originally telecast. This gives the opportunity to follow a show through in sequence, which in some cases is downright essential, in the case of shows with serialistic qualities. Now, Magnum, PI wasn’t entirely serialistic, but it did observe some continuity throughout its run. When the episodes are aired all over the place, as Retro TV is doing, the continuity is thrown out the window. It’s kind of frustrating.

Also disappointing, for me as an old fan of this show, is that the version of “Don’t Eat the Snow” is edited so that the show starts with the standard credits sequence. But “Don’t Eat the Snow” was a two-hour TV-movie, actually, and it featured a different credits sequence than the one we all know from later in the show’s run — and that credits sequence actually took place about five minutes into the episode! I tried to find that sequence online and failed, but you can hear the first Magnum, PI theme song here. At the beginning, you hear the revving sound of the Ferrari’s engine as Magnum speeds away, and then the titles begin, with animation based on what was, I assume, intended to be a major visual motif of the series — the Cross of Lorraine that was engraved on the ring that Magnum and his fellow Viet Nam buddies wear. While the eventual Magnum theme song would become one of the iconic teevee theme songs, I still like the “70s private eye” vibe of the original.

Share This Post

Murder! Whiskey! Sexy!

In catching up on some teevee viewing of late, it seems that my oft-stated mission to adopt no new teevee shows to watch regularly has already failed, as The Wife has taken a liking to the CBS mystery show The Mentalist, which I’ve also been watching and finding enjoyable, although not quite as much as she does. (I’d love for the main character to be wrong once in a while, for instance. And not just “wrong” as in “out on a limb but all ends well”, but really really really wrong, as in, “fingers the wrong guy for a murder” wrong.)

The show is about a small group of detectives in the California Bureau of Investigation (which means that I suppose all episodes will take place in California, as opposed to shows using FBI characters, which are able to set their episodes anywhere in the US — while still filming in California, I guess) who investigate murders and stuff. The murders tend to be oddball kinds of things: one episode opens with the detectives wandering through a deserted field, having been told by anonymous letter that they’ll find a body there; while commenting on the lack of a body, a skydiver plummets to his doom about ten feet from where they’re standing with a comically-timed thud. There tends to be a lot of gallows humor on this show.

The title Mentalist refers to the most unusual member of this crime solving team, a guy named Patrick Jane who is extremely smart, extremely knowledgeable about human social behaviors, and freakishly observant. He sometimes seems almost psychic, but his flashes of insight always turn out to hinge on his ability to put together a couple of things he’s observed previously — such as his noting that a guy in a wheelchair has scuffed shoes, or that a psychologist claims ignorance of something he should know about given that he has a whole shelf of books devoted to the topic. Stuff like that.

We didn’t find this show until more than halfway through the season, so we didn’t watch the episodes in any sort of order, and now that we’re in re-runs, CBS has moved the thing around a bit, but now we’re able to go back to the beginning thanks to the magic of watching stuff online. This is nice because now we see a bit of the show’s backstory. It turns out that Patrick Jane is a former teevee psychic who used to go on shows like Oprah and allow audience members to contact their deceased family members; what’s especially refreshing is the show’s rigidly skeptical outlook toward stuff like that. Jane is a fraud, he knew he was a fraud, and he knew all along that he was simply exceptionally gifted at cold reading. However, he goes on teevee five years prior to the events of the series and talks about a serial killer disparagingly, and the serial killer murders Jane’s wife and daughter as a result. So it turns out that even though The Mentalist is generally a “one episode, one mystery” show, there is some kind of serial backstory flowing through it, as Jane is understandably obsessed with tracking down “Red John” (the serial killer), who is depicted as Moriarty to Jane’s Holmes.

As soon as we saw the first of the “Red John” episodes, giving the show some backstory and giving a bit of dark background to our hero Mentalist, I was reminded of one of the shows we liked to watch back in the 1990s, Profiler, which ran on NBC on Saturdays (paired with The Pretender and canceled despite decent ratings so NBC could run that awful Extreme Football crapfest that only lasted a single year). Profiler featured FBI agents who jetted all over the country investigating terrible crimes, led by a female agent (Samantha Waters) who had an ability to “see” the crimes from the eyes of the victims and the criminals, thus allowing her to have special insight. Her ability was never really explained as being psychic or not, where Patrick Jane’s is pure observation; but like The Mentalist, Profiler had a long-running backstory in which the heroine was pursuing, and being pursued by, a brilliant serial killer who had murdered her husband.

The Mentalist has more of a sense of humor about it than Profiler did; the latter could get downright grim on occasion. (But not so grim as the similarly-themed Millennium, which, while brilliant in its first two seasons, was also deeply depressing at times.) The cast has good chemistry, which is nice to note, although as I note above, it would be nice if the show would have Jane being completely wrong once in a while. (Of course, we haven’t seen all episodes yet, so maybe that’s happened and we missed it.)

So now I have a new show to watch. Joy.

Share This Post

“I know what you’re thinking, and you’re right!”

I linked this over on Facebook, but not here, for some reason. Someone did a nifty Star WarsMagnum PI mashup:

It’s pretty amusing, but when I saw the following a day or two later, I actually became impressed with the original effort. It puts the two side-by-side: the original Magnum main titles on the left, and the Han Solo PI title sequence on the right. They really chose shots from Star Wars that match up, thematically and/or visually, with the shots in the Magnum titles! Color me impressed.

I love it!

Share This Post

On Romance and the Teevee

Lance Mannion wonders:

The rule is that on just about any TV series these days, whatever the genre, no matter if it’s a comedy or a drama, every unattached main character must at some point become attached. There must be a love interest.

If that love interest can be another member of the cast, so much the better. It saves on salaries. You don’t have to hire two new actors. The writers are spared the trouble thinking up two new characters who must be likable, a requirement that makes it highly probable that they won’t be in the least—they’ll be “likable.”

Don’t worry if the characters pairing up are unsuited for each other. Don’t worry if there’s no chemistry between the actors playing the newly coupled couple. Don’t even worry if there’s another character one of the lovers would be a better match for. Apparently audiences need to be assured that their favorites aren’t sleeping alone.

Love is always a good thing. Hence, the rule.

When did this rule kick in anyway? It wasn’t in effect when I was a kid. There was no rule that regular characters had to pair off like swans and turtle doves. None of my favorite shows had a love interest. Captain Kirk didn’t have a love interest. Jim Rockford didn’t have a love interest. Hawkeye Pierce didn’t have a love interest. They had love interests, plural. Even into the ‘Eighties, main characters on TV shows were unabashedly and cheerfully serially monagomous. MacGyver didn’t have a love interest. Magnum didn’t have one.

When the writers felt like writing a mushy story they invented a character that a guest star was brought in to play for one or at most two episodes before she or he got killed, betrayed the hero or heroine, or decided for the hero or heroine’s own good that they had to part forever.

That’s how they handled in on the Ponderosa. How many wives did the Cartwright boys go through. Little Joe alone filled whole cemeteries with the women he loved and lost to illness, bullets, or an Indian’s arrow. That was the Bonanza Way and if it was good enough for Ben, Adam, Hoss, and Little Joe, it’s good enough for Shawn Spencer…

In his comments, I noted:

Two thoughts on “Why romance”: first, it’s probably a logical outcome of shows observing that they have internal continuity; most shows nowadays, if not actually being serialistic in nature, will at least structure things so that characters grow over time, and previous exploits/adventures/cases/whatever can be reference on occasion. Thus, a viewer who tunes into a sporadic episode of, say, CSI can follow along, while a viewer who is a big fan and never misses an episode is kept going by whatever serialistic storylines the show has going on. Second, the focus on romance could come from the media’s ongoing obsession with demographics. Maybe they just figure that romances that don’t always end with a death or a plane ticket at the end of the hour will keep the women tuning in more often?

I’m going to flesh out my comments here a bit, though. First, in re-reading Lance’s post, I see that he says that Magnum didn’t have a love interest. He’s referring, of course, to Thomas Sullivan Magnum, played ably by Tom Selleck. And Lance isn’t quite right here. Magnum did have a love interest: his ex-wife Michelle, who turned up several times through the show’s run. Early on in the series, we learn that Magnum married Michelle in Vietnam, and she was killed in a hospital bombing shortly thereafter. But then, in one of my favorite episodes of the show’s run, he learns that she’s not dead, but for various reasons he has to let her go, because she faked her death and married another. She comes back a few years later, figuring in the almost-series finale in which Magnum “died”, and then she returned the next season only to be murdered for real this time. OK, the particulars aren’t necessary, but what matters is that Magnum did have a love interest.

But I think what Lance is getting at is the series regular kind of love interest. Michelle wasn’t there every week, on Magnum PI. That’s probably a good thing, though; by keeping her appearances infrequent, it reinforced the notion that whomever else may come, Michelle was the love of Magnum’s life (and, after her death, their daughter Lily). And each time Michelle showed up, enough information was given in the episodes’ expositions that casual viewers who didn’t watch every episode could figure out who she was. So when did we make the transition from “one love per episode” to “sustained lovers” on teevee shows?

Well, I’m not entirely sure, to be honest, but I suspect the change was fairly gradual. Lance also mentions Captain Kirk’s girlfriend-of-the-week. (Of course, few of those could actually be considered “loves”.) The movies would postulate that Carol Marcus was the real love of his life, of course; or rather, the second love of his life, after the Enterprise. But regular loves started showing up in sitcoms in the 1970s, right? I don’t remember Richie Cunningham’s beloved girlfriend being an official regular, but she was there quite a lot, right up until he married her. And then Fonzie himself got married. Laverne and Shirley had that Carmine guy. Part of these quasi-regular love interests were probably put there for realism’s sake — after all, how could they explain a high school kid in the 50s having a different girlfriend every week? That would have made no sense. And eventually the show went on long enough that having Fonzie constantly toting another name from his little black book around stopped working, so they came up with something new. (Didn’t save the show, of course. It was gone pretty soon thereafter.)

With the arrival of Cheers, we saw the beginning of the extended sitcom romance, didn’t we? Sam and Diane meet in the first episode, and flirt a while. They’re on-again, off-again. Diane goes away and gets engaged to someone else (enter Frasier Crane). She dumps Frasier, back with Sam, and so on. Why did this happen? Well, right around the time Cheers was starting up, the grand prime-time soaps of the 80s were gathering steam: Dallas was huge, Dynasty and Knots Landing were rising. And before those, there was Little House on the Prairie, which had quite a lot of serialistic content itself. Even if that show didn’t rely on season-long storyarcs the way the soaps did, they still had actual events that took place and had reverberations for a long time to come: Laura meeting Almanzo, the Ingallses adopting Albert, Mary starting that school for the blind, et cetera.

The change came on gradually, but I think the early 80s is really when episodic teevee started to reflect the notion that characters aren’t just going to stay static forever; they get older and their lives move on. Surely the rigidly episodic nature of teevee shows occurred to people even during the 50s and 60s, didn’t it? Did anyone ever wonder, a la the kids in Stand By Me, how come the Wagon Train never got anywhere?

Ultimately, I think Lance’s “rule” that shows must always have a love interest is there pretty much because romance draws in the viewers, for the most part. Or it keeps them. And anyway, not every show has a love interest for the hero, does it? Jack Bauer hasn’t had a steady one. (Renee Walker might be that, or she might not. This past season had some sexual tension between them, obviously, but nothing happened that went anywhere.) Earl on My Name is Earl didn’t have one. I’m not as up on the show, but I don’t think that House has one (unless you figure that he’s bound to end up with Cuddy, but that’s not the same as a constant love interest). Grissom had one on CSI, but that was on-again, off-again; I’m not sure that Mack Taylor or Horatio Caine have regular love interests on NY and Miami. (Mack’s wife was killed on 9-11-01; Caine is in love, I think, with the cop who married his brother.)

In general, though, I think that Lance’s rule stems from a general shift to a more serialized way of watching teevee. Law and Order excepted, there just aren’t that many shows consisting of self-contained episodes anymore.

Share This Post

The pipes still work!

Sorry for the radio silence the last few days, but Real Life got pretty busy for a few days, so busy that in the few moments I had where I could conceivably have posted something, I just didn’t feel like it. No, nothing bad happened; in fact, it was all good stuff. The Daughter had her first concerts as part of a couple of school music groups: she was in chorus Wednesday night, and then the orchestra (she plays the double bass) the second. The first concert ended up being quite long, as the program featured a number of groups from two different elementary schools in the district; the second was shorter, but there was an ice cream outing afterwards. Curse you, Cold Stone Creamery! (And the cute teenager who was making our sundaes that night said several times while making mine how much she loves whipped cream. I think she was flirting. Yay, me! I still got it!*)

We also had to finally get finished up on our teevee viewing, by knocking off the Grey’s Anatomy season finale. Wow, I love that show. The finale featured one of the more effective “OMG!!” moments I’ve seen on a teevee show the last few years, when the identity of the horribly-injured-in-a-disfiguring-way-if-he-even-survives John Doe was revealed. (I realized who he was about a minute before the actual reveal happened.) And the show had me thinking, “Oh, don’t die, Izzie! Don’t die!” Which is amazing because I can’t stand Izzie. There’s some good writing, there.

But anyway, that’s why there was a profound lack of blogging the last few days. Normal posting will resume…soon. Heh.

* OK, I know, not really. She was just happy and bubbly with all the customers. Yeesh.

Share This Post

Teevee!

Wow, am I glad that the teevee season is over. The only thing we have left to watch, here at Casa Jaquandor, is the finale to Grey’s Anatomy, so don’t be spoiling it in comments, people! Some thoughts on various shows:

:: Yeah, we’re still not done with Grey’s, but I found this season very strong, overall — there were a lot of good storylines, and the show chemistry was considerably aided by the addition of Drs. Hunt and Robbins. Hunt is the Army vet who has taken over trauma at Seattle Grace; he’s the new love interest for Christina Yang and his emotional problem (everybody’s got one, after all) is that he suffers from a small bit of PTSD. Just a bit. Like when he woke up in Christina’s bed, looked up at the rotating ceiling fan blades, flashed back to chopped blades, and started strangling Christina. Oops. (She got better, but it was still a bit of a speed-bump for their relationship.)

Robbins is a pediatric surgeon who is also the love interest for Callie Torres, who over the last year has realized that she is a lesbian. Torres came out to her controlling family at the end of the season, with disastrous results.

The season featured the ongoing and occasionally tempestuous relationship between Meredith Grey and Derek Shepard (“McDreamy”). They finally agreed to marry, after Shepard suffered a massive loss of confidence and spent some time moping in the woods. The most notable plotline was that of Dr. Izzie Stevens, who spent a big part of the season hallucinating her dead fiance, to the point of actually “making love” with him (not sure what the mechanics there involved, but we’ll leave that alone). Denny’s reappearance was eventually explained, not mystically, but medically: Izzie’s got a brain tumor! Yay! Well, OK, not really. What was impressive about all this is that the Grey’s writers managed to get me to feel sympathy for Izzie, which is odd because until this year, I’ve generically hated Izzie. Wow!

:: Hell’s Kitchen was its usual basket of fun, mostly a blend of Gordon Ramsay screaming at people and laughing at the travails of some incredibly irritating contestants. Lacey may have been the most annoying person to ever appear on HK, which is no mean feat. I liked that Danny ended up winning. Not much to say, really, about HK other than that.

:: The Amazing Race had a pretty strong season, in my opinion. A lot of people I’ve seen commenting on it online seemed disappointed in it, but I thought it was terrific. It featured some surprises (one team thinking it had won a leg, only to have Phil say, “The Race is still going. Here’s your next clue.”), some interesting obstacles that I hadn’t seen before (one team incurred a four hour penalty for breaking a couple of rules on the same leg, another ended up getting eliminated because one of the racers had to pee before checking in), and some unusually gonzo detours and roadblocks (rolling giant cheeses downhill, jogging a few miles in a Siberian city in their underwear, and my favorite, pie-throwing in Austria). I didn’t hate any of the three teams in the finale, although the team I liked the least ended up winning (Tammy and Victor), while the team I liked the most (Margie and Luke) came in third because Luke got too frustrated at the final roadblock. I do wish that the TAR people would change things up a bit on the finales; it seems like whoever comes out of the final roadblock first pretty much wins the race by default. That kind of saps the energy from the last fifteen or twenty minutes of each finale.

:: The Office was kind-of hit-and-miss all year, although they pulled it out at the end of the year, I think, with Michael’s resignation, creation of his own company, and then his leveraging of that company into getting his old job back. The finale’s final moments, with Jim and Pam learning that she’s pregnant (no words spoken, but that’s about the only possible interpretation, right?), were wonderful, and as a Buffalonian, I was amused that the Buffalo branch of Dunder-Mifflin is getting the axe. (Why does Utica get to keep its branch? Screw Utica!)

:: I had to let my Watching 24 series of posts fall by the wayside because our camera died and we took about two months to get around to replacing it. That’s what happened there, if anyone was wondering. 24 had about three-quarters of a good season this year, but then it sagged at the end, which was disappointing. Usually, 24‘s seasons tend to sag a bit in intensity for a few episodes in the middle — say, between Hours Twelve and Fifteen — before the writers start getting things ramped up again for the finale. This year was different: they actually managed to keep things intense through three-quarters of the season, all the way up to Hour Eighteen or thereabouts, and then things got dull quickly. What happened? Well, there were just too many villains in the season, and it got to be too much. It started out with Tony Almeida being the bad guy; then it turns out he’s working for Colonel Dubaku. We’re thinking that Dubaku’s the main baddie — but he’s just working for General Juma! So it’s Juma, right? Not so fast: Juma turns out to be working for Jonas Hodges, who was a wonderful villain, played by Jon Voigt in some seriously fun scenery-chewing. But Hodges was disposed of too, with a new reveal of yet another shadowy villain, played by Will Patton. (I don’t even remember this guy’s name.) Oh, and Tony Almeida, who had originally been a bad guy who was revealed to be a good guy, turned out to actually be a bad guy after all, albeit one working on his own agenda and not for any of the season’s major villains, not really. Oh, and Kim Bauer turned back up at the end of the season, right in time to get herself in danger again (although not from feral mountain lions).

I read that the 24 writers actually took advantage of the time given them by the decision after the writers’ strike a year ago to simply postpone the series a year in order to rewrite the season’s last six episodes. Turns out that maybe they should have stuck with their original scripts. Oh well. It was still a fun season with some great moments (the deaths of Bill Buchanan and Larry Moss), one great new character (FBI Agent Renee Walker, played by the beautiful and talented Annie Wersching, and officially dubbed on AICN as — I swear I am not making this up — “Rack Bauer”), and some terrific action sequences. It also featured a fictional President so inept at picking people to work the high levels of her administration that if he watched the show this year, Jimmy Carter was probably screaming, “Oh come on!”

:: I still like My Name is Earl, although apparently most people don’t. Oh well. I thought it was still funny, but now it’s off NBC and out there hoping to be picked up by another network. We’ll see.

:: I also love 30Rock more and more. It’s just terribly clever and funny, full of teevee injokes that only a tiny portion of the audience probably ever get, and I’m more and more in awe of Tina Fey each week. She’s just an amazing, amazing talent, and she’s willing to do just about anything for the laugh. I love that.

:: I didn’t pay much attention to CSI: Miami this year. Nor did I pay much attention to CSI: NY, and I haven’t watched any of the original CSI in two or three years now. I guess my interest in those has petered out.

:: What else? American Idol was more fun this year than last, I think, and the final came down to two guys I liked just a shade out of equally — I liked Adam Lambert a bit more, but not enough to be annoyed that he lost. Kris Allen did very well too, and I was happy that for just the third time since I’ve watched the show (and the first since Season Four) the finale didn’t come down to someone I liked versus someone I disliked.

:: I watched the last couple of episodes of House. Still a good show, but I have to note that House’s drug problem is becoming less and less interesting, even if he is now officially crazy. I hope the show milks his stay in the mental hospital next year a bit.

:: I haven’t watched Dollhouse since the finale, but I do have the episodes downloaded, so I’ll catch up on that during the summer. I also want to start watching Battlestar Galactica, now that it’s done. (I’ve only seen the pilot teevee-movie.)

:: And finally, apparently Scrubs has been picked up for another year, which will take place without John Dorian working at Sacred Heart, since Zach Braff decided to leave the show. I’m torn here — I’d rather my favorite show go out while it was still on top, rather than keep limping on without its heart and soul, but who’s to say it can’t keep going on with the cast it’s assembled, plus some new people? They introduced some interns this year who are actually fun characters, my favorite being the jaded and cynical Dr. Mahoney, dubbed “Jo” by JD owing to his seeing her as being similar to Jo from The Facts of Life. Can the show survive, thus reworked? I’d be skeptical, if Season Eight hadn’t been so consistently brilliant. Seriously, Scrubs had as good a year as I’ve ever seen a sitcom have.

And that’s the state of my teevee viewing.

Share This Post

Asystole.

So, ER ended the other night. I didn’t watch it, or anything of this final season aside from a chunk of the first episode of the year, but I do note the official end of a show that for me ended four or five years back. Time then, I suppose, for one final summation of my love-hate relationship with ER.

I remember ER‘s first season, back in 1994, when it was replacing LA Law in NBC’s Thursday night lineup. Now, LA Law had also been a favorite show of The Girlfriend (later The Wife) and I, but it had petered out over its final few seasons, getting more and more lame as it went. What had really done LA Law in? Well, it was an ensemble show about lawyers, and as an ensemble show, it was designed so that it could lose characters if it needed to, by simply adding new ones. Sure, there were some members of the ensemble who were more important than others, but if done right, they could be interchanged. Only, it turned out, they really couldn’t. Once enough of the compelling original characters — the Harry Hamlin, Jimmy Smits, Susan Dey, and others — had left, the replacements turned out to be significantly less interesting, and the same problem afflicted the writing staff. So a show that started out with a neat and fresh look at the world of high-rolling legal eagles became a show that disposed of troublesome characters by having them step through elevator doors without realizing that the elevator wasn’t there.

Another show that started a year before ER did was NYPDBlue. It, too, was ensemble-by-design, but it fared much better than LA Law did. For one thing, NYPDBlue managed to hold onto one of the most important cogs in its ensemble wheel for its entire run (Dennis Franz’s Andy Sipowicz). For another, Blue was, over its entire run, far more successful than Blue in replacing departed characters with new ones. I’ve always felt that NYPDBlue never got enough recognition for keeping the chemistry right even with completely different characters coming and going through more than ten seasons.

What does this have to do with ER? Well, ER was also an ensemble-by-design show. Ensemble shows live or die by their ensembles. A show that gets canceled probably suffers that fate, in part, because its ensemble doesn’t have the right chemistry. (Sometimes, anyway. Look no farther than Firefly for a show that had awesome ensemble chemistry and yet felt the grim embrace of Network Doom.) ER was not, in my opinion, terrifically successful in maintaining its ensemble chemistry once original cast members started leaving, and eventually that — and some trends in the writing that bugged me greatly — contributed to me finally giving up on the show.

When did ER start to lose me? Well, I’ve long maintained that ER managed the odd trick of jumping the shark not once but twice, at least in my view. There were two plot developments that came about a year apart, if I recall correctly, that both put big dents in my enthusiasm for the show to start with, dents from which my enthusiasm would never recover.

The first was the major storyline feeding into the departure of Dr. Peter Benton. Benton was another arrogant surgeon, right from the show’s first episode, played by Eriq La Salle. Even though Benton was gruff and arrogant, he was also a good man; in one memorable moment he interceded to keep Dr. Carter’s life from spinning out of control. So, way back in season two, Benton had a brief affair with a woman from his neighborhood named Carla, an affair which ended quickly but not before producing a son named Reese. Benton and Carla would split custody, with occasional bad blood erupting, most notably when Benton used the court’s custody order to prevent Carla’s husband, Roger, from accepting a job that would have required him, Carla, and Reese to move to Germany.

Anyway, there would be some emotional stuff over the years regarding Reese Benton, who went through a difficult birthing process and who would later turn out to be deaf, forcing Benton to explore the ethics of cochlear implants. Well, in Season Eight, Eriq La Salle decided it was time to move on, so the show gave him one last big storyline. One night Carla and Reese were in a car accident. Reese survived with minor cuts and bruises, but Carla was killed — and thus we were plunged into a child custody storyline, with Reese’s step-father Roger and biological father Peter fighting it out for the kid.

Now, for one thing, this was all very “soap opera”. What made ER compelling much of the time was that, for most of the first half of its run, it managed to keep the soap opera stuff mainly in the background, in favor of the medical stuff. There was just enough soap opera to keep viewers caring and to keep the characters from being mere faces, but until the Reese Benton custody fight, it never overwhelmed the show. And of course there wasn’t much doubt about how it would end, was there? Peter would get custody. Everybody knew that. And sure enough, he did.

But.

Here’s where the writers first poisoned the well for me, because over the course of that plotline, it turned out that Peter was not Reese Benton’s biological father at all. So the story went from biological-dad-versus-stepdad to stepdad-versus-guy-who-once-did-the-dirty-with-mom. As soon as that was established, I figured, “Game over” — how on Earth can the fact that this guy thought he was the biological father for five years trump the fact that he’s not, while the other guy really was the child’s stepfather for those same years? I don’t see how it could; from that moment it made no moral sense for Peter Benton to get custody, and yet, that’s exactly what happened. The writers managed to make me lose sympathy for Peter. And they couldn’t even make it a kind of “karmic victory” for Peter by having Roger be a complete jerk who really shouldn’t have custody at all; no, Roger was a good guy, a hard-working successful guy who had loved his wife and been a good provider for his step-son.

And then, in a moment of transcendent awfulness that was the first time ER actually pissed me off, they had the defeated Roger come to the hospital, so he could give Reese’s Christmas presents to Peter so that he might give them to the kid. And Peter says, “Come over on Christmas and give them to him yourself.” Roger tears up — and well he should, since he’s just been colossally screwed — and says something like “Thank you, this means a lot to me.” What does Peter Benton say?

“I’m not doing it for you.”

And I’m thinking, “Way to go, writers. You’re letting Benton go out by making him a dick.” At least Benton took with him the awful Dr. Finch, a pediatrician played awfully by Michael Michele, an actress who seems to have two facial expressions.

The second shark-jumping, and for me the more serious, was the fate of Dr. Romano, which came two seasons later. Robert “Rocket” Romano (played wonderfully by Paul McCrane) was an enormously gifted surgeon, and he knew it, too; he knew everything and he pretty much seemed to hate everybody. He had little by way of social skills, he was horribly un-PC (“I swear ‘ER’ stands for ‘Everybody’s retarded’!”), and he basically went around saving lives because only he could and spewing unending gouts of cynical sarcasm that he got away with because he could save those lives by virtue of his amazing surgical skill. Not unlike Dr. House on House.

But Dr. Romano would also show hints of humanity every so often. Once he burst into the ER in a panic, cradling a critically injured patient in his arms: his own beloved dog. He exploded into rage when he failed to save a fellow doctor’s life. He was in love with Dr. Elizabeth Korday, which he mostly accepted was doomed to be unrequited but which he allowed to show by being her confidant in some very dark moments.

After Romano was established thereof, the writers threw an astonishing twist at him: in a weird accident involving a helicopter, Romano’s arm was chopped off. It got reattached, but he had to spend months in rehab trying to get it to work so he could return to surgery perhaps. However, it didn’t work, and the arm began to die, so Romano had it amputated. All this played out over a year or more, and it was a fascinating arc for a fascinating character, as Romano became more and more hostile toward his co-workers while he tried to figure out just what kind of doctor he could now be. Still a doctor, but no longer the god-like surgeon? It was a fascinating place to take a character.

That was when the writers decided it was time for a curveball. They had Romano outside the hospital, in the alley, one day, as another helicopter was lifting off from the helipad on the roof. Some kind of mechanical failure happened, the helicopter literally dropped out of the sky…right onto Dr. Romano. End of Romano. That happened early in the episode, and the rest of the episode featured characters constantly wondering where the hell Romano had got to, right up until the final fade, which showed a big crane lifting the wreckage of the helicopter. Presumably, minutes after the fade to credits, someone says, “Hey, is that a body under there?” So the guy whose life had been irrevocably altered by a helicopter mishap was now ended in another helicopter mishap. Yuk, yuk, yuk. To me, that felt just like LA Law‘s dropping Rosalind Shays down an elevator shaft. Romano’s death felt like a joke, from the visual of the helicopter crushing him (it looked just like the 16-ton weight that was always crushing people on Monty Python’s Flying Circus) to the fact that the hospital would pay tribute to Romano by putting his name on the AIDS clinic when he’d been depicted as being at least mildly homophobic. Yuk, yuk indeed.

Of course, it wasn’t just specific plot points that annoyed me with the show, and besides, there would be others to come along. It was the ensemble. Doctors started coming and going with such regularity that the show felt like it had a revolving door on it, and at times the cast ballooned to the point where characters would get a few minutes each of screentime per show. Many of the new doctors were just plain nowhere near as interesting as the ones from the early seasons — the afore-mentioned Dr. Finch, for example. Did any regular viewer ever count Dr. Dave Malucci as a favorite? Shane West, a talented actor, was pretty much wasted when he was brought on as a doc who was little more than an older version of the flirting-with-delinquency kid he’d played on the far better written Once and Again.

Not just that new characters weren’t that interesting, but they’d also get tossed aside ridiculously quickly, pretty much the second the writers realized they didn’t know what they were doing with them. Thus it was that Susan Lewis disappeared overnight the second time. Dr. Korday got less and less screen time until the writers finally had her go home to England. Nobody cared about Dr. Malucci, but even so, his firing was a lame, out-of-the-blue moment. And so on.

The stories got jacked up to ’11’ all the while, too; while early seasons would end with a sense that life would continue and that not all things are resolved, later seasons would end with Dallas-esque cliffhangers of the “Who will live! Who will die! Come back in October to find out!” variety. One season faded to black as three characters were in a car that went off a bridge and into the water; another ended with a doc being trapped beneath the thundering masses at an antiwar demonstration. In fact, my actual last straw with the show was one of those cliffhanger episodes, when a bunch of criminals burst into the ER itself and shot the place up. The Moldavian Wedding Massacre worked on Dynasty because, well, that was Dynasty. On ER, it was just stupid. I never watched an entire episode after that.

And it wasn’t just cliffhangers and bad ensemble stuff, either. ER just settled into a monotonous sameness over time. In the early seasons, they knew how to change things up in ways to keep things interesting, but when they would do that in later years, they would always do it in exactly the same ways. For some reason, the showrunners became fascinated with the idea of the big-city ER docs going off to work in squalor in Africa, an idea which was interesting the first time but became less so each time they did it after that (and it was a lot). You could also always count on the Big Name Guest Star to show up to play either the Seriously Ill Person, from whom one of our docs would learn some kind of life lesson, or the Colorful Family Member, which would yield some soap opera stuff. James Cromwell. Bob Newhart. James Woods. Sally Field. Alan Alda. Lather, rinse, repeat. Some of these episodes were actually pretty good, strictly speaking, but there would still be this air of “been there, done that” hanging over them.

Why did this all bother me as much as it did? Because when ER was good, it wasn’t just merely good. There was a reason that the show took the country by storm back in 1994, and it wasn’t just all the WHOOSH steadicam stuff and the rapidfire medical dialogue and the bloody trauma stuff. It was, for all its new-ness, a very good show. It was, week in and week out, for four or five years at least, just a great thing to watch. One of its masterstrokes was to show not just doctors in different specialties at work but to include students in the mix, so that Dr. Carter became our “gateway” character to this world. Some of those individual episodes still stand out for me and, I suspect, many other people who remember the show from back then. “Love’s Labor Lost”, for example. This was the first time the show departed from its general formula of lots of patients in an hour to follow one case. A mother in labor is wheeled into the ER, and as Dr. Greene tries one thing after another, her labor spirals out of control until it’s a tossup as to whether he can save mother, baby, or either. He saves the baby. The mother dies. It was a brilliant episode that had ramifications for Greene’s character that would play out for years to come.

Season two brought a storyline focusing on a troubled Dr. Ross that culminated in one of the most riveting hours of teevee I’ve ever seen. Ross is on his way home, in a downpour, when he’s stopped by a kid whose brother has become trapped in a drainage culvert. And still later on that year came a heartbreaking episode in which one of the EMTs they deal with regularly is severely burned in an apartment building fire. There were a lot of episodes like that, back when ER was great. And yes, it was. Even after it started to lose me, it had some moments. The episode in which the ER staff learns that Dr. Greene has died was, for me, a far more fitting sendoff for that character than the episode a week later that backtracked and showed the last month of his life. (The episode opened with Dr. Carter reading a letter to the ER staff from Dr. Greene, who had gone to Hawaii to spend his final days. Only at the end of the letter does Carter notice the handwritten postscript from Dr. Korday — Dr. Greene’s wife — that Mark had died. Carter posts the letter on the bulletin board, and the rest of the show depicts a day in the ER when everyone has to mull over Greene’s passing, until the end of the show, when we flash forward six months or so to see the letter still on the bulletin board.) The show’s two-hundredth episode was a late standout, showing Drs. Carter and Pratt treating the same patients twelve hours apart.

Obviously, since I haven’t watched ER in several years (the “ER Massacre” happened, I’m not going to miss it now that it’s gone. For me it was already gone. But I still salute it for what it once was.

Share This Post

You DONKEY!!!

Oddly, thus far into this season of Hell’s Kitchen — four episodes that I’ve watched thus far, with one more waiting to be seen — Chef Ramsay has yet to call anyone by my favorite term of endearment, “You [bleep] donkey!” For some reason that always makes me laugh.

Anyway, this is an entertaining season thus far, as always. Seeing these chefs of varying culinary talent and experience nevertheless struggle equally to make Ramsay happy is always fun, as are his unending string of expletives directed at those who inspire his wrath.

One thing from an episode a couple of weeks ago struck me as odd, though. The chefs were all made to get up very early and go for a walking tour of a commercial butcher operation, which was basically a big warehouse where a number of workers are processing sides of beef. Most of the chefs reacted horribly: “It’s cold! It smells awful!” and so on. And I’m thinking, “You’re cooks, and this is meat. You should be fascinated by this, not repulsed!”

Ditto later on, when the female team lost the Gordon Ramsay version of that old Letterman chestnut, “Know Your Cuts of Meat”; as part of their punishment they were fed a lunch of various beef innards. Again, you’re cooks. At least a few of you should actually like innards, right? Aren’t lots of very famous dishes in fact made of innards? Foie gras is an innard, isn’t it? (Yeah, an innard of a goose, but it’s the same principle.) I always end up wondering just how serious some of these people are about food.

Share This Post