Kuato Lives!

It appears that the “We’re just going to keep launching probes there until one of the damned things lands successfully!” approach has finally struck pay-dirt: the Spirit rover has landed on Mars, and the probe has actually begun returning images. Kudos to all involved: space exploration needs a shot in the arm these days. For further updates, check the Jet Propulsion Laboratory website. It’s days like this that I get a tear in my eye that Dr. Sagan is no longer alive.

Scientists were flummoxed, though, by the lack of the one feature they most expected to find at their selected landing site: a sign reading “Future Site of a Wal-Mart Supercenter”.

(And I think it would be cool if, in Star Wars Episode III, George Lucas tipped his hat to NASA by having a spaceship that lands not by lowering landing gear but by deploying a sheath of balloons and bouncing all over the planet surface until it rolls to a stop!)

Share This Post

It’s MY line anyway, dammit!

Sara Donati points out a website devoted to saving ABC’s improv comedy show, Whose Line Is It Anyway?, from cancellation. I have to admit that I was very surprised ABC canned the show, since it can’t be that expensive a production to mount (they couldn’t even spring for new props for the “Props” game!), and since ABC’s track record at developing shows in recent years is pretty abysmal, Whose Line gave them something they could plug into their schedule as needed. But then, I don’t pay much attention to ABC, so maybe they’ve turned things around over there and thus don’t need a cheaply-done comedy sketch show. Oh, well — but a pity, because I always enjoyed Whose Line, even if I thought that in its last year or two the cast started to get a bit repetitive, something which also plagued the original British version that I used to watch on Comedy Central (which was starting to become The Tony Slattery Show, with supporting players).

Anyway, if you’re a Whose Line fan, give the site a look. I’m generally skeptical of these “Save our show!” types of sites, since in my experience they tend to fail miserably (look what happened to Millennium and Once and Again, for starters).

Share This Post

New Year’s from Vienna (a follow-up)

As I noted the other day, I watched this year’s New Year’s Celebration from Vienna, as taped on PBS. And as always, it was a delight, although I thought this year’s conductor, Ricardo Muti, generally selected tempi that were a bit on the “brisk” side — not so much a problem for polkas and galops, but “On the Beautiful Blue Danube” just felt way-too-fast to my ears.

The telecast’s camera work was, as always, excellent, with my favorite bits coming in the first waltz of the program when the camera seemed to soar down from the high ceiling of the Musikverein, giving bird’s-eye-view shots of the orchestra, a perspective I’d not seen before. Wonderful.

The daughter got a big kick of the fact that Muti “conducted” the audience’s clapping during the “Radetzky March”, which is always a pleasure — especially since the folks at our local PBS station have finally realized that just because the credits roll over the “Radetzky March” doesn’t mean they can break in over the music to tell us what’s on next.

Share This Post

Friday Burst of Weirdness

You know that raffle game where they partition a football field into small squares, sell tickets corresponding to the squares, and then lead a cow around the field until the cow poops, with the owner of the square on which the cow leaves his load being the winner?

Well, apparently there is a bar in Texas where a smaller-scaled version of this game is played, with chickens.

(I have a feeling that I could fill ten years’ worth of the “Friday Burst of Weirdness” with items starting off, “There’s a bar in Texas where they….”)

Share This Post

“Stubby”?

In the last post, I mention that I’m not interested in bashing Howard Dean, mainly because I think that time spent focusing on Dean is time not spent on President Bush. However, I guess it goes without saying that others disagree: here is a blog devoted specifically to bashing Howard Dean. (Link via Alex Frantz.)

I haven’t dug too deeply into things on that site — and I’m sure that Morat will hate it on sight! — but I did look at this post, in which Politus (the blogger) presents some numerical data that apparently gives the lie to a statement Dean made to the effect that he is the only Democratic candidate who comes from a “farm state”, and that therefore he’s the only one who “understands farm issues”. However, the numbers Politus uses to illustrate his point don’t really work, because he quotes total farm employment figures, which given the populations of the various states involved, is rather misleading. Vermont is one of the smallest, and least populated, states in the country, so it’s pretty obvious that it very likely has fewer total farmers than Arkansas, North Carolina, or Ohio.

A better indicator would have been to look at what percentage of those states’ total employment numbers are represented by farming. Doing that, we come up with the following:

Vermont 16.5 %
Arkansas 20.8 %
Massachusetts 12.3 %
Missouri 16.3 %
North Carolina 18.5 %
Ohio 13.7 %

Now, Dean’s statement seems a tad disingenuous, since two of those states derive a greater percentage of their total employment from farming than does Vermont, and a third is only slightly smaller in percentage terms. And I’m not even certain that farm employment is the relevant statistic here. A better indicator of a “farm state”, it seems to me, is not the total number of people working in farms, or even the percentage of a state’s labor force working in farms, but the percentage of a state’s economic activity that derives from farm and farm-related business. A state whose workforce is, say, 15 % farmers but whose total economic activity comes, say, 40 % from the ag sector seems to me to have a better claim on being a “farm state” than a state whose workforce is 20 % farmers but whose total economy is only 30 % farming.

And even if all those numbers go against Dean, he can always play the “governor” card, claiming a greater knowledge of “farm issues” by virtue of his being Governor of a “farm state”, as opposed to, say, a career military man who hails from a farm state, or a Congressman or Senator likewise sent to Washington by a farm state. It’s easy to see how he’d frame that case: “As Governor, I’ve had to set policy on a day-to-day basis for my state’s farmers, yada yada yada.”

So, this may well be a questionable assertion on Howard Dean’s part, one of those wonderful pieces of campaign hyperbole that stream unceasingly from candidates’ mouths in any election cycle, but it has not been shown yet to be a “lie”.

Share This Post

2004: A Preview

I’m not sure if these qualify as “New Year’s Resolutions”, but they sort of fill the bill. Here are things I want to do or accomplish in 2004, beyond the big stuff I mention in the previous post.

:: There’s a new section in my sidebar titled “2004 Reading List”. I’ve always paid lip-service to becoming better read, and I think I’ve done so, but in drips-and-drabs through the years. Now I want to do more, read more. Thus, the reading list, which comprises books I want to tackle in the coming months. I don’t know how many of them I’ll get done, but if I can knock out at least half this list, I’ll be happy.

Quite a bit of it is very old stuff, “foundational” literature of mythic nature. Basically I want to explore the roots of storytelling, by going upriver to the actual springs themselves and sampling the virginal waters. As I proceed through the list, whichever work I am currently reading will be at top and in yellow type. I may actually add books to the list as the year proceeds, and I will almost certainly roll any unread books over to a 2005 list, when that time comes. The order of the list is pretty random: I won’t necessarily be reading in list order.

:: Politics. I plan to keep my political postings at about my current mix. I’m not interested in being a pure political blogger, but I am likewise unwilling to return to my original “no politics at all” policy. I also will refrain from gloating in November if Bush loses, or crying in my beer if he wins.

However, on another political note, I have decided to make official the way I’ve been leaning for a couple of months now: In the Democratic primaries, I will support General Clark. This is based more on enthusiasm for Clark than any lack of enthusiasm for Howard Dean, whom I plan to support whole-heartedly if he wins the nomination (and whom I have no interest in bashing). But for now, I think Clark represents a level of gravitas that I’d like to see embraced by Democrats in general.

:: Music blogging. I plan to write more about music here, both at random and by plan. One idea I’ve been nursing is a chronological exploration of John Williams’s music – both filmscores and concert works. There’s enough Williams music out there that this would take me quite some time.

:: And as always, you can all expect more rants about the Buffalo Bills, more mouth-foamings about people who say bad things about Star Wars (you newer readers, just trust me on this point!), more Images-of-the-Week, more Friday Bursts of Weirdness, and most importantly, more women who trample Britney Spears like the washed-up, unpretty tart that she is.

Onward and upward!

Share This Post

Boring Introspection Ahead.

Now that we’re into 2004, I thought I’d try making a bit of sense out of 2003, and hell…I can’t. I genuinely don’t know what to make of the year now gone by. In a lot of ways, it completely sucked, but in other ways it wasn’t that bad at all. My hope is that 2003 will be one of those years that, while unpleasant, turns out to be where some of the building-blocks of my future “good life” were put down.

My big goal for 2003 was to get moving on my freelance writing career, and sadly, I was never able to get out of the starting gate on that. This was for a lot of reasons, but they were mostly financial: spending the year unemployed, I never had the resources necessary to really market myself, especially in an era of economic downturn when companies are tightening belts already. Instead of blasting out 500 or 1000 sales letters and brochures at once, and joining the Chamber of Commerce so I could attend networking events, I could only muster tiny mailings here and there (we’re talking between 20 and 40 letters at a time). It wasn’t that I couldn’t achieve critical mass, I couldn’t even get the clump of snow rolling down the hill. That is by far my greatest disappointment of 2003. All the books say not to quit your day job when you’re trying to start a freelance writing career, but they’re not exactly long on advice for people who have already crossed that particular bridge, for one reason or another.

As I mention, spending a year being unemployed was not remotely what I had in mind. There’s an obnoxious vicious cycle where you lose your job in a downsizing/reorganizing maneuver, and then the only jobs out there are lower-paying, so you apply for those en masse; but the few interviews you get come to nothing because employers know you’d be taking less pay than your last job, and ergo, obviously you’ll leave the second something better opens. Add in the companies that advertise for positions that don’t even exist, and, well…I’ll stop complaining now.

My fiction writing didn’t produce my first fiction sale, as I had hoped, but I still plug on, despite the fact that I’ve slacked off seriously in the short-fiction department, something which is high on my list to rectify this year. My main fiction goal in 2003 was to get The Promised King, Book One out to a publisher, and this I did. My main goal in 2004 is to finish the first draft of The Promised King, Book Two, and then move on to the idea for a horror novel that I’ve been nursing for four years now, before the idea gets tired of sitting in my brain and goes off to nest in someone else’s.

Basically, I think that 2003 might end up being personally important to me more for what I figured out about myself than for any actual event or accomplishment. It’s always been a no-brainer with me that I’d be happier making, say, $100,000 a year writing than making the same amount doing anything else. But 2003 forced me to confront the more likely scenario: Would I be happier making $20,000 a year as a writer than making $100,000 a year doing anything else? The answer to that, I finally realized, is yes. In the choice between writing and doing something else that is more lucrative, I really would find it better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

So here we go. As Van Miller would have said, “Fasten your seatbelts”.

Share This Post

Mandatory Traffic Babbling

December 2003 saw my second-best traffic totals. Thanks again to anyone who reads and/or links me. I suspect that December might have set a new record if not for all the Holiday stuff, which makes me optimistic for January, now that all the Christmas vacation/days off/office parties/assorted whatnot that keeps people from the crucial business of reading blogs is done with.

(By the way, here’s a ping to The Ever-Evil Mr. Jones. Are you out there?)

Share This Post

Vienna Dreams

There’s a wonderful moment in the James Bond movie The Living Daylights, when Bond is trying to secure the trust of Kara, a lovely young cellist from Bratislava whose boyfriend has already turned out to be a KGB agent. Bond tells her, “We might catch up with him in Vienna”, and Kara’s eyes light up at the mere mention of that city. This is because Vienna is almost holy ground to classical musicians.

My unending New Year’s Tradition is to watch the annual PBS telecast of New Year’s From Vienna, a concert involving the Vienna Philharmonic and a ballet company in which works of the Strauss family are performed, and ending with the traditional encores of On the Beautiful Blue Danube and The Radetsky March. And in a further, charming tradition, at the first sound of the shimmering tremolo that opens The Blue Danube, the audience erupts in applause, at which time the conductor addresses them with a brief greeting for the New Year before beginning the work again.

If I have any one musical dream, it would probably be to attend this concert in person. How I’d love to sit in that glorious hall, the Musikverein, and hear the Vienna Philharmonic. Just look at this wondrous place:

I once got involved in a Usenet “debate” over the merits of Vienna’s New Year’s concert with some stuffy classical music “literati” who sternly lectured me on how the Vienna Philharmonic is coasting on its former glory, and how the Strauss family repertoir is just tired stuff, and how this event is not an important “event” in the musical world. This person could not even begin to understand the idea that this concert is a personal tradition for me (and, given its worldwide audience, for many others) in much the same vein as listening to the Boston Pops on TV playing Sousa marches on the Fourth of July.

Ninety minutes a year, spent listening to “tired repertoire” played by an “irrelevant orchestra”….well, somebody’s got to do it.

Share This Post