3 Comments

  1. To be perfectly fair to both Lucasfilm, and MPAA, neither situation you describe constitute "free" or "not for profit" screenings of the films. In both situations, the films are, or were to be screened in retail business locations for the purpose of attracting clientele with the hopes that they will spend money while they were there. This is the definition of "for profit."

  2. That's pretty obvious, Paul. I even stated as such. What makes a "free screening" free is the lack of an admission charge to access the building. The charges for food or drinks are incidental and would be incurred by patrons there in any event, screening or no.

    I suspect that the MPAA's objections would stand even if I set up a screen in a farm field and announced a free screening of a movie on a BYOB basis.

  3. I agree. They should have asked for permission far in advance of the event. I love the part of the story where SPIKE TV was showing all the films at the same time. They could have just put a TV on the bar and showed the films that way with no problems.

    I would like to see them reschedule the event with all the proper permissions. I would like to see Lucas pony up for some snacks (name brand snacks ya cheap bastard) and everybody goes away happy with some of what they wanted.

    I appreciated your unique take on this story. You gave me perspective at a time when I was enjoying going off on George Moneybags.

Comments are closed.