3 Comments

  1. Booyeah! Total agreement on the dreadful "synergistic" approach to Star Wars that requires you to be up on everything across all media platforms to really know what the hell is going on. Not even Star Trek at its most navel-gazingest ever went to that place. Same with the Marvel Cinematic Universe… all the properties reference each other in one way or another, and if you've read the comics you can grin knowingly when you see something in the background, but it isn't required. Time was, the tie-in novels and comics were merely supplements to the movies… value-adds, to use some more awful biz-speak jargon. They were… electives. To turn them into pre-requisities is a colossal mistake, in my view.

    But then I've realized the other day I just don't have the energy or the inclination to live and breathe a media franchise anymore. I'm too damn old, I guess. I'm outgrown being a fanboy and now I am merely… a fan.

    I'd like to think that a lot of people are going to start eating crow and realize things weren't so bad under George Lucas, but (a) people never admit they're wrong like that, and (b) the fanboys will just eat this stuff until they're so engorged they explode like Mr. Creosote in that Python movie.

    Meantime, I'm going off in search of that bootleg scan of an early 35mm print of the original Star Wars…

  2. I MUST totally agree that one oughtn't have to read the books, watch the cartoons, et al in order to understand ANY character in ANY movie.

    My thought, and this is me trying to make sense of it all, is that Finn's backstory will be revealed in the next installment – in flashbacks, maybe?

  3. I agree. Back when Episode III was released, I was annoyed because Lucas introduced General Grievous in the title crawl, however, to really know the general, you had to have watched the Clone Wars shorts on the Cartoon Network in the previous couple years.

Comments are closed.