Something for Thursday

A few weeks ago I was doing a job at work. (I know, right! I was surprised, too!) It was a long job: repainting the walls of a small bathroom and then re-doing the floor, so I was in this small room for basically two days. To pass the time, I listened to music; I have a little Bluetooth speaker at work that pairs to my phone. It’s this speaker, actually:

Mini Bluetooth speaker, by Klein Tools.

I’m a fan of the Klein tools brand, and this speaker has pretty decent sound for a single-speaker jobsite-style item. But this isn’t a speaker commercial, so moving on: I was listening to an album by Drew Holcomb and the Neighbors on YouTube Music, which is generally my streaming service of choice. YouTube Music has an “autoplay” setting where, if you’re listening to an album and the album ends, it moves right on to…something else. It might be a playlist or album of yours, or it might not be; it might be the same artist you just listened to, or…it might not be. Sometimes this leads to interesting musical discoveries; sometimes, not so much.

This was one of the interesting ones. I have no idea how YouTube Music’s algorithms work, but in this case it brought up a song that stopped me in my tracks, and I had to look it up when I got a chance. (This was a few hours later, so thankfully I was able to find my listening history and ID the song!)

Gregory Alan Isakoff is a singer-songwriter who lives in Colorado. His bio states:

Born in Johannesburg, South Africa, and now calling Colorado home, horticulturist-turned-musician Gregory Alan Isakov has cast an impressive presence on the indie-rock and folk worlds with his five full-length studio albums: That Sea, The GamblerThis Empty Northern HemisphereThe WeathermanGregory Alan Isakov with the Colorado Symphony; and Evening Machines (nominated for a Grammy award for Best Folk Album). Isakov tours internationally with his band, and has performed with several national symphony orchestras across the United States. In addition to owning his independent record label, Suitcase Town Music, he also runs a small farm in Boulder County, which provides produce to the farm’s CSA members and to local restaurants.

As for this song itself, it seems to be a distillation of wistful regret the looking back at various missteps that marred a beautiful thing:

Now I’ve been crazy, couldn’t you tell?I threw stones at the stars, but the whole sky fellNow I’m covered up in straw, belly up on the tableWell, I drank and sang, and passed in the stableMhm, mhm

And that tall grass grows high and brownWell, I dragged you straight in the muddy groundAnd you sent me back to where I roamWell I cursed and I cried, but now I knowOh, now I know

 

And yet…there’s something here, some little hint of optimism, lurking behind the song’s sad melody and lyrics. Would “turning these diamonds back into coal” be such a bad thing? And maybe it’s just me, but the main stringed instrument here is a banjo, and while the banjo isn’t always a happy instrument, it’s not a purely sad one, either. Consider Kermit and “The Rainbow Connection”, for example.

Anyway, here is “The Stable Song” by Gregory Alan Isakoff.

 

Share This Post

Tone Poem Tuesday (Rachmaninoff at 150)

I’ve featured this piece before, and it’s not even by Rachmaninoff. So how does it tie in? Because when it was composed for the film Dangerous Moonlight, a World War II potboiler whose protagonist is a talented pianist and composer, it was as a replacement for the originally planned work: Rachmaninoff’s Second Piano Concerto (which will be the major topic of my next Substack newsletter). It’s not entirely clear why the Rachmaninoff couldn’t be used–copyright fees, perhaps–and the producers tried commissioning a work from Rachmaninoff directly, but he turned the offer down. So, in the Concerto’s stead, a new work was composed–in pieces, which are heard through the film. The entire work was basically stitched together by the film’s orchestrators, resulting in the work that is fairly well-known today as a single-movement work: the Warsaw Concerto, by Richard Addinsell.

It’s also one of the best intentional pastiches of a specific composer’s style that I’ve ever heard. Here it is:

 

Share This Post

Something for Thursday (May the 4th edition)

It’s always a delight when Something for Thursday aligns with Star Wars Day! Here are some selections, with the little extra proviso for myself that none of them comes from any of the mainline “Skywalker Saga” films (e.g., nothing from Episodes I – IX.)

Long live Star Wars.

Share This Post

Tone Poem Tuesday (actually a symphony, but it’s MY blog, and I say it counts)

So April is over and May is upon us! Sergei Rachmaninoff’s birth month is passed…but we’re not going to be turning away from him in my various online outlets, not at all. Stand by for more Rachmaninoff!

But for now, I have to post Tchaikovksy’s Symphony No. 5, because it’s a great work. Really great. How great? Well…apparently one woman at a recent Los Angeles Philharmonic performance of the Tchaikovsky Fifth found it…this great.

As a woman in her thirties, I know how difficult it can be to balance all that is expected of us: spending quality time with friends, self-care, keeping up with the news, a finger on the pulse of art and culture, a finger on our own pleasure points, etc. Well, over the weekend it seems one woman managed to have it all! During a performance of Tchaikovsky’s 5th at the Los Angeles Philharmonic, many concertgoers reported a woman having a “loud full body orgasm.” Multitasking at its finest, if you ask me.

“Everyone kind of turned to see what was happening,” Molly Grant told the Los Angeles Times. “I saw the girl after it had happened, and I assume that she … had an orgasm because she was heavily breathing, and her partner was smiling and looking at her — like in an effort to not shame her,” Grant said. “It was quite beautiful.”

Another concertgoer, Magnus Fiennes, tweeted that after the “loud and full body orgasm” the “band politely carried on.”

As soon as I read this story, my immediate thought was: I wonder what part of that symphony was, um, inspiring to this person? I came up with a few possibilities, either in the second or the fourth movements, and now that an audio clip of the event has surfaced online, I hear that I am right: she, er, arrived during the second movement, which is, after all, one of the most gorgeous slow movements in all of classical music.

Here is Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 5, performed by the Cleveland Orchestra, conducted by George Szell.

There is no sonic passion in this recording other than what Tchaikovsky wrote, with one exception: Szell adds a cymbal crash near the end.

 

Share This Post

Rachmaninoff at 150: Variations

We’ve already heard the Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini, which is one of Rachmaninoff’s enduring later works. By contrast here is another Theme and Variations, this time the Variations on a Theme of Chopin. Rachmaninoff composed this work in 1902, and it is his first large-scale work for solo piano. As such, it isn’t heard very often in performance these days, as it is seen as an awkward and youthful work…but I’ve always liked it rather a lot, especially since I played the very Chopin prelude on which it is based, back in my piano lesson days. The Chopin prelude is heard pretty much intact right at the very beginning of the work, and then Rachmaninoff takes over.

By the way, April may be over, but my celebration of Rachmaninoff isn’t even close to being over!

 

Share This Post

A song

I happened on this artist yesterday via social media. I liked this song a great deal, and I plan to explore her music more. Her name is Áine Deane (the first name is apparently pronounced “Onya”), and she is from the UK. Enjoy!

 

Share This Post

Something for Thursday: Rachmaninoff at 150

Two syrupy 1970s love ballads today!

The lead artist here is singer-songwriter Eric Carmen, who was a big star in the 70s and has had a good career all along. You generally can’t go wrong with the 1970s, where power ballads are concerned. The first, “All By Myself”, is actually one of the iconic power ballads of that era. The second, “Never Gonna Fall In Love Again”, is probably less well-known, but it’s a very representative song of its genre.

I remember hearing “Never Gonna Fall” the first time…on the Muzak system at work. I wasn’t really processing the song playing in the background, because that’s the whole point of Muzak: it’s background music you don’t process. It’s aural wallpaper. We can discuss the virtues, or lack thereof, of Muzak another time…but I remember walking along, vaguely thinking about the song that was playing. Then, it suddenly snapped in to place.

And this is where our 150th Birthday Composer comes in to play.

Both of these songs take their main melodies from Rachmaninoff.

“All By Myself”‘s main tune (not the chorus, but the verses) is from the second movement of Rachmaninoff’s Piano Concerto No. 2 and “Never Gonna Fall In Love” gets its tune from the third movement of my beloved Symphony No. 2. Carmen apparently had classical training before he switched to pop music, and thus his familiarity with those two works and his decision to use them in two of his songs.

Unfortunately for Mr. Carmen, he also made some incorrect assumptions regarding the copyright status of Mr. Rachmaninoff’s music. Rachmaninoff was dead by this point and his music was public domain in the USA, but not abroad, where he eventually had to agree to share profits with the Rachmaninoff estate to be able to sell and perform those records. This does not seem to have been a particular contentious affair, but it explains why you might see Rachmaninoff, who died in 1943, credited with a couple of 1970s power ballads.

I’ve seen some arguments occasionally that the suitability of a couple of Rachmaninoff’s melodies to such a use demonstrates their lack of seriousness, but…that’s just goofy. I ignore that stuff. Who’s got time for any of that?

More on the Second Concerto and the Second Symphony to come. In the case of the Symphony, much more to come. That one’s been percolating in my head for years….

Share This Post

Rachmaninoff at 150: The Towering Third

Sergei Rachmaninoff proofing the published score for his Piano Concerto No. 3. Via Wikipedia.

If you remember the movie Shine, for which Geoffrey Rush won an Oscar, you may remember something of the reputation of Rachmaninoff’s Piano Concert No. 3 in D minor. I’m no concert pianist–hell, I’m not a pianist of any kind, so I am in no way equipped to assess the degree to which that movie mythologizes the phenomenal difficulty of Rachmaninoff’s Third Concerto. The film, for which actor Geoffrey Rush won an Oscar, tells the story of concert pianist David Helfgott, whose mental illness was exacerbated by his obsession with the Third Concerto and the work he had to endure to be able to perform it.

David Dubal writes, in The Essential Canon of Classical Music:

The Third Piano Concerto was composed at Ivanovka [Rachmaninoff’s country estate in Russia, a place for which he pined all his life after he and his family fled the country forever in 1917] for Rachmaninoff’s first American tour in 1909. It is terrifyingly difficult, and its challenge has become a legend among pianists. Only a hero of the keyboard should think of working on this exhausting piece, with its huge load of notes and dense harmonies. The pianist Gary Grafmann wishes he had learned it as a youngster, stating that “probably the only time when I could have learned that magnificent knucklebreaker would have been when I was still too young to know fear.” The work also needs a superlative interpreter who can fully project the almost unbearable nostalgia of Rachmaninoff’s lost Russia.

The Concerto’s first performance was conducted by Walter Damrosch, but the second was conducted by no less a figure than Gustav Mahler, then in the days of his ill-fated stint atop the New York City musical world. Even so the Third Concerto languished somewhat in popularity behind the wonderful Second, until Vladimir Horowitz came along and championed the Third with all his unique star power.

By the time Rachmaninoff was writing this work, his musical eye was focused entirely backward. Russia had not yet entered the throes of its revolutionary phase, but the cracks were certainly showing; and in the arts, Rachmaninoff was already the last of the living Russian Romantics, with Tchaikovsky gone, Rimsky-Korsakov in his last days, and the remaining “old guard” quickly aging out. Stravinsky was already pushing his Modernist vision, Sergei Prokofiev was coming of age, and though he was still a child, Dmitri Shostakovich was on his way. And in a world of his own stood Alexander Scriabin, by the 1900s and 1910s becoming more and more devoted to his own mystical vision of a world transformed by his own music.

Rachmaninoff had not left Russia by this time, but he could sense the ending of an era and the shifting of the world into something he felt ill-at-ease to recognize. Thus his music stands at odd contrast with what his contemporaries were producing…but for all that, the audiences remained on his side, for the most part; the Third Concerto, with its soaring melodies and thrilling pianistic pyrotechnics, is still a rollicking, thrilling listen.

Bonus: here’s a video that excerpts 30 different pianists, starting with Rachmaninoff himself, as they all play the exact same passage of wicked difficulty. The level of precision dexterity required to successfully navigate that passage, and make it sound good, is just mind-bending:

 

Share This Post

Tone Poem Tuesday: Rachmaninoff at 150, the many lives of “Vocalise”

There are some pieces of music that take on lives of their own, extending far beyond their origins to become something bigger. Rachmaninoff wrote a song cycle in 1915 called 14 Romances, op. 34. We’ve already noted that Rachmaninoff was one of the great Russian masters of the art song (a facet of his output that is underappreciated by many, including myself), but one of the songs of this cycle transcended the other thirteen and has become not just one of Rachmaninoff’s most well-known works, but one of the most well-known works of classical music…so much so that it is heard far less often in its original setting.

The song is the last in the cycle, called “Vocalise”. It has no words. The singer is instructed to sing the entire melody on the vowel sound of their choosing. The melody’s swirling nature takes over the song to almost hypnotic effect when unfettered by words and their tendency to impose meaning on things. “Vocalise” becomes a tone poem in itself, in which a pianist and a vocalist work together to make something rather magical.

Here’s “Vocalise” in its original form:

The story of “Vocalise” doesn’t end there, though. The melody and feeling of “Vocalise” has proved too tempting to the music world to just leave it to the sopranos of the world, or the pianists. So, this one song has been set and re-set and re-set again, arranged for every combination of musicians you can think of. In this way it’s not unlike Pachelbel’s Canon in D, which everybody has heard in some version or other, but almost never the way Pachelbel originally wrote it. (Does that make you curious? Here you go!)

Some versions expand the piano accompaniment to a string orchestra:

Once you go that far, it’s easy enough to just give the whole thing to the orchestra!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImjVPONGIa8

Or you can make it a piece of chamber music, this time for string quartet:

Or you still do it for string quartet, but differently:

This one is near to my heart, for obvious reasons. I wish I’d known this existed back in my trumpet playing days:

How about a saxophone? Don’t laugh! Rachmaninoff himself appreciated the saxophone, using it to great effect in his Symphonic Dances, one of his last works. I have a feeling he’d appreciate this one.

How about a British brass band?

You can go down quite the rabbit hole looking for new and different renditions of this one song. (Electric guitar, anyone?) But I’ll feature just two more. First, almost bringing it back to the original version, this time keeping the piano all by itself:

And finally, returning to the orchestra arrangement, this time in conducted almost a hundred years ago by Rachmaninoff himself. This video uses old film footage of Rachmaninoff and family, making it something of a time capsule:

Why is “Vocalise” so enormously effective, to the point that everyone wants to play it? I suspect the answer is a simple one: that gorgeous melody, dreamy and slightly melancholy, is just appealing on a gut level, and it’s a long melody that weaves an almost hypnotic spell on the listener. There are a lot of emotions expressed in this short work, and I think that’s at the heart of its appeal to both audiences and performers alike. In the end, I think that many times, if not every time, we want our music to express something, even if we can’t quite put in words just what it is that’s being expressed.

Share This Post

Rachmaninoff at 150: Not an easy interview, that Sergei (but who would be, over breakfast?)

One thing I’ve discovered in reading a lot about Sergei Rachmaninoff over the last few months is that while he led a rich inner life, he didn’t really like to talk much about it. Interviews with him tended to be taciturn affairs, or they would be exercises in frustration for the interviewer in which the subject would avoid any topic that might be of interest to anyone but the subject.

Here’s a case in point that ran in a Minneapolis newspaper one hundred years ago!

Transcription:

Rachmaninoff Likes Yankee Griddle Cakes, Scorns Eggs

Russian Pianist More Interested In Breakfast Than In Interview

The name of Sergei Rachmaninoff is written high in the gallery of modern musical immortals–but as he stirred his coffee at breakfast this morning in the Radisson hotel, and liberally deluged his stack of wheat cakes with maple syrup, there was nothing of the great artist about him except for his long, graceful fingers. Tonight, at the Audtorium, those same fingers will do incredible things on the piano. This morning, they grasped a coffee spoon with firmness, and stirred the contents of the cup until the coffee slopped out into the saucer.

Rachmaninoff, pianist-composer, is about as easy to interview as a Russian blizzard. He arrived at 7:30 a.m. today from Winnipeg, and at 8:30 he was still in a state of complete frigidity, so far as interviewers were concerned. It was not that the famous artist was discourteous, but simple that he appears to have a sincere distaste for being interviewed.

Likes Minnesota Pancakes

He answers questions in monosyllables whenever possivle. Only twice did he show signs of loquacity–and then not about himself, but about his personal friend Bruno Walter of Vienna, orchestra conductor who will direct the symphony orchestra a week from Friday night, and about his other conductor-friend, Henri Verbrugghen.

“Walter is a superb conductor,” said Rachmaninoff. “I expected to meet him here, but learned to my disappointment that he will not arrive for a week.”

After this burst of gossip, Rachmaninoff busied himself again with his pancakes, and took a tentative spoonful of soft boiled egg. He pushed the egg cup away.

“Your pancakes in Minnesota are all right, but I cannot say as much for the eggs,” said Rachmaninoff. “Your soil here, too, is remarkable fertile.”

Wants to Tour Lakes

This observation, in view of the fact that the soil hereabouts is covered with a foot, more or less of now, seemed rather far-fetched until Rachmaninoff, forgetting his reticence again, explained that he learned all about soil when he was personally managing his estate in Russia. He has been in Minnesota in the summer, and expects to come back next summer, if possible, for a month or so of vacation in the state of pines and lakes.

“Do you drive?” he was asked.

“Always,” replied the composer, with the greatest vigor he displayed during the entire interview. “Do you think I would trust myself to a chauffeur? Indeed not. I have no use for them, and if I tour Minnesota, I will drive every foot of the way myself.”

Again the great Russian, who has been living in New York since the revolution exiled him from his native land, applied himself to his pancakes, and further questions elicited nothing but sounds which, coming from a less distinguished personage, would have been called grunts.

Thanks to Fillyjonk for calling this to my attention! I’ve had the picture opened in a tab for about six weeks now.

My favorite part of this is when Rachmaninoff starts to open up on the subject of driving. Rachmaninoff loved cars and would often go on long drives to calm his no-doubt jangled nerves. In this he has a major point of commonality with another of my heroes, George Lucas. This particular degree of being less-than-open for an interviewer does seem a bit extreme, even for Rachmaninoff, so one wonder just what the interviewer’s in-person deportment might have been like; the resulting article, while amusing, does seem to walk right up to the line of being rather, wall, jerkish.

But you know, I’m not sure how willing to talk I would be if someone was asking me questions while I was trying to enjoy a stack of hot pancakes, either!

It’s worth remembering, too, that Rachmaninoff was as renowned in his day as a performer as he was a composer, if not even moreso, so here’s a recording of Rachmaninoff performing not his own music, but a Nocturne by Chopin. (Opus 9, No. 2 in E-flat Major, if you must know. This is one of Chopin’s most famous works, and one with which I struggled mightily in my piano playing days. The runs in the last few pages just would not inhabit my fingers at all.)

 

Share This Post