Shut up, Joe. Just SHUT UP.

Warning: rant ahead!

My God, would someone in Joe Paterno’s family just step up and shuffle the old fool off to a nursing home so he can babble at the walls or something? Doddering Old Joe has just come out with his latest explanation of where things went wrong:

Joe Paterno, in the midst of treatments for lung cancer, made his first public statements since being fired after 46 seasons at Penn State, telling The Washington Post he did not know how to deal with the situation when he received a report that his former defensive coordinator was accused of abusing a boy in the shower at the Penn State football facility.

“I didn’t know exactly how to handle it and I was afraid to do something that might jeopardize what the university procedure was,” he told The Post in an extensive interview at his home in State College, Pa. “So I backed away and turned it over to some other people, people I thought would have a little more expertise than I did. It didn’t work out that way.”

Paterno said that until assistant coach Mike McQueary, in 2002, approached him, he had “no inkling” of a possible dark side to Sandusky, according to The Post.

“He (McQueary) told me what he saw, and I said, what? He said it, well, looked like inappropriate, or fondling, I’m not quite sure exactly how he put it. I said you did what you had to do. It’s my job now to figure out what we want to do,” Paterno told The Post.

“So I sat around. It was a Saturday. Waited till Sunday because I wanted to make sure I knew what I was doing. And then I called my superiors and I said, ‘Hey, we got a problem, I think. Would you guys look into it?’ Cause I didn’t know, you know. We never had, until that point, 58 years I think, I had never had to deal with something like that. And I didn’t feel adequate.”

Paterno affirmed reports that McQueary was not specific in describing what he allegedly saw, and he told The Post that even if he did, “I don’t know that it would have done any good, because I never heard of, of, rape and a man. So I just did what I thought was best. I talked to people that I thought would be, if there was a problem, that would be following up on it.”

I cannot believe this. Once again it’s “I just punted it upstairs”. He didn’t know what to do? Is there anyone out there who thinks that this is really that hard a question? He “was afraid to do something that might jeopardize what the University procedure was“? Is he kidding? He was Joe F***ing Paterno. I’m willing to bet that even if he somehow screwed up some PSU ‘special procedure for reporting crimes‘, nobody — not one person — would have complained or called him on it. He would not have gotten in trouble in any way. Why?

Because he was Joe F***ing Paterno, that’s why.

We’re talking about a man who was (and, in some camps, continues to be) worshiped for some inexplicable reason. Does anyone think for one second that Paterno would have received even so much as a mildly-stern talking-to had he somehow “broken PSU procedure” in the course of reporting a possible felony committed against a child?

Somebody, please, shut Doddering Old Joe up.

Share This Post

Who are we?

Political comment below the fold….

This, I am afraid, is what our country now is.

We don’t welcome the world’s oppressed who are seeking freedom; no, we’re all about shutting the borders and denying freedom to those already here. We’re Pepper Spray Nation now, when a cop can just casually walk back and forth pepper spraying peacefully-gathered activists as calmly as if he was walking his dog.

And anyone thinking, as apparently does FOX News idiot Megyn Kelly, that pepper spray is benign stuff because hey, it’s made of pepper, let this article disabuse you of that notion.

This is a chemical designed to repel humans by causing them intense misery and pain and discomfort. Hmmm…the key word there is chemical. I’m pretty sure we took a dim view, ten years or so ago, of governments that used chemicals on their own citizens. I wonder why we’ve decided otherwise now that it’s just those dirty hippies who we’re spraying.

I dunno…I just have zero idea what kind of country we are anymore. We don’t believe in providing healthcare to all citizens, and we instead believe that it’s OK for most people to be one serious health crisis away from utter disaster. We don’t believe that government spending can create jobs and help stave off economic calamity, but we do believe that when the military wants to close a base or two, it’s time to demonstrate because of the jobs. And we don’t believe in governments quashing protests in other countries, but here, it’s just fine.

Just who the hell are we, anyway? I wish I knew.

Share This Post

Say it ain’t so, Joe

Warning: profanity-laced rant below the break.

Fuck Joe Paterno.

I’m serious. I’ve never been a big fan of the guy, but that’s mainly because I have always found rather unseemly the Cult of the College Coach, the Towering Figure On The Sidelines whose stature is that of godlike power and unaccountability. This business unfolding at Penn State University, however, is breathtaking. I can’t think of anything else that comes close.

My father is a collegiate math professor at St. Bonaventure University, a school with a Division I basketball program that has a lot of boosters in that town and has a storied history in the sports lore of Western New York. Eight or nine years ago there was a recruiting scandal at SBU that ended up costing the university president, the athletic director, and the coach their jobs. A recruiting scandal. They broke rules to get a single player on the team.

Penn State’s malfeasance is infinitely worse. This isn’t a recruiting scandal. Nor is it channeling money to the pockets of NFL agents, or whatever it was that USC and Ohio State did. This was covering up a felony, the kind of crime that, if you’re convicted of it, gets you some years in prison, followed by some years of wearing an ankle bracelet and having to tell the authorities where you live, so they can in turn let parents and schools know that there’s one of those kinds of criminals in the neighborhood. As ESPN’s Rick Reilly writes, “Don’t feel sorry for Paterno. He’s had his life. Feel sorry for these boys, because they may never get one.”

Did Joe Paterno do anything criminal? Apparently not. But we have a tendency in our society to assume that there’s a one-to-one correspondence between what is legal and what is moral. There’s no question in my mind, none whatsoever, that he did the absolute minimum in a situation that screamed out for way, way, way more than that. If I found out that someone was doing something to The Daughter, and that this person’s boss knew about it and their only action was to tell their boss and then go on their merry way, I’d want to kill that guy, too. Paterno is the guy who drives by a car wreck, sees the driver laying bloody on the side of the road, and chucks him a box of Band-aids before driving off.

What happens now? This whole week has been one unseemly thing after another. The ‘impromptu’ show of support by PSU students on Paterno’s lawn. His nauseatingly clueless statement. His decision to retire after the season. PSU plans to still play a home game on Saturday. What the hell kind of atmosphere is that going to be? Will that stadium be filled with 100,000 people screaming their support for this doddering old bastard? Seriously?!

This is the kind of story that makes me hate sports. I’m reminded of the high school football players who caused a car accident that resulted in people suffering significant injuries requiring multiple surgeries and a lot of rehab, and the judge letting them finish the season anyway. Another ESPN writer, Jemele Hill, writes:

But this is the uncomfortable reality in big-time college sports. The NCAA, universities and colleges have created a system that allows coaches to become bigger than the institutions they are supposed to be serving. Because of the escalating salaries earned by college coaches and the pressing funding needs these schools have, the irresponsible actions of coaches not only are often tolerated and overlooked — remember Ohio State president Gordon Gee joking that he hoped Jim Tressel wouldn’t fire him when the school announced a two-game suspension for Tressel? — but the university officials nominally in charge far too often choose to render themselves powerless.

If Penn State doesn’t stop Paterno from coaching again, it sends the message that a powerful coach still is the final authority.

There are more important things than football, and if PSU’s season is shot because of this, well, suck it, PSU. Joe Paterno should be gone now, not at the end of the season. And PSU should just cancel the rest of their season. But I doubt either one of those things will happen, because Paterno is a Big Damn God in central PA and PSU football is a religion for some folks.

And calling it a religion is a pretty apt metaphor, I think. Covering up the actions of a pedophile? Congratulation, Penn State University. You’ve just become the Vatican, with JoePa as your Pope.

So, yeah. Fuck Joe Paterno.

(Comments are off on this one. I haven’t the least bit of interest in debating this.)

UPDATE: Now, a few hours after I wrote this post, I see that PSU has fired Paterno. That’s the start of doing the right thing.

Share This Post

How do we know when the show’s over, anyway?

EDITED: I forgot the link!

Michael Kinsley can kiss my ass.

Seriously. Chris Christie can’t be President because he’s fat? Really?

If Christie becomes the Republican nominee for President next year, I won’t vote for him. But that will be because of the insane beliefs of the Republican party, not because of the girth of its nominee. That’s it. For me, it’s ideas and policy, not anything else.

To make it easy, here is a list of qualities that make zero difference in my weighing a person for their Presidential potential:

Fat
Thin
Black
White
Asian
Male
Female
Married
Single
Has kids
Has no kids
Gay
Straight
Catholic
Protestant
Jewish
Muslim
Confucian
Atheist
Mormon
Likes broccoli
Hates broccoli
Likes the Star Wars prequels
Hates the Star Wars prequels
Roots for the Bills
Roots for the Dolphins
Served in the military
Did not serve in the military
Worked in the private sector
Didn’t work in the private sector
Has executive government experience
Has no executive government experience
Likes baseball
Likes football
Likes soccer
Likes dogs
Likes cats
Likes chinchillas

I could go on. In truth, I’ve never been a big fan of Michael Kinsley, and this certainly does not enhance my view of him. What a dumb-assed article. I hope Kinsley meant it as a joke, because if he didn’t….

Share This Post

A tale.

“Who’s that guy?”

“Oh, him? He’s amazing. You wouldn’t believe the stuff he does.”

“Like what?”

“Well, he’s enormously wealthy because of something he invented. But he doesn’t keep any of the money. He gives every penny of it to charity. And he spends all of his free time reading to the blind, rescuing stray dogs and cats, and he invites homeless people into his home so he can feed them and give them a shower so they can be clean-cut when they look for a job.”

“Wow, what a great guy! And all that from one invention?”

“Yup.”

“What’s the invention?”

“Clamshell packaging.”

[beat]

“Yeah, f*** that guy.”

“I know, right?”

Share This Post

Let us have no more!

Kinda-sorta meta-political rant below the fold. And concealed, so highlight the text if you really want to read it. (I do not recommend this.)

About a month ago I decided to stop reading political blogs almost entirely. I removed all of the links to political blogs from my blogroll, and I deleted all political blog RSS feeds from my Google Reader set-up. I only kept two other blogs that maintain political comment, because both are by local guys I like a lot and have met on occasion; but I dumped those, too, from Google Reader when their outfit decided to switch their RSS feeds to providing summaries only. (I hate being forced to click through to read something. It’s annoying and an obvious ploy to get actual page loads, not unlike publications online that break articles into multiple pages when they obviously don’t really need to, and obviously only do it so their ads reload each time you click to the next page.)

I wandered into the comments thread of one of those the other day, and this particular blog’s comments are always predictable, in that within four or five comments, the resident libertarian will chime in to indicate that the entire issue discussed in the post, no matter what issue it is, would go away if we just let the market fix it. And sure enough, this guy chimed in to say — and this is not an unfair paraphrasing, either — that we wouldn’t need political parties in the US at all if we could all just agree to be libertarians!

I just can’t do political discourse anymore, folks. I simply do not have the wherewithal to process the stupid things that people believe anymore, and I have zero interest anymore in contributing to “the discussion”. What’s gonna happen is gonna happen; I’m just going to keep living my life, reading and writing about what interests me, and I’m going to try to stop living in the increasingly fruitless hope that one day I’ll be able to honestly say that the most liberal President of my life, in terms of policy, actually wasn’t Richard F***ing Milhous Nixon.

(And don’t get me started on the 9-11-01 conspiracy shit that is filling up my Facebook feed.)

Share This Post

The hell with all of it.

Political rant below the fold.

This whole idiotic business about President Obama’s birth certificate perfectly illustrates what’s wrong with political discourse in this country. This week, Obama finally got sick of the whole damned thing and released the long form certificate, which says exactly what the short one he’s released all along said it would say. Well, duh. What a stupid nontroversy this has been.

I thought of it a couple of weeks ago when I went to the DMV here to apply for my Enhanced Driver’s License (a souped-up license with embedded electronica which is accepted as proof of citizenship and identity at Canadian border crossings). One of the required documents for that license is a birth certificate, and I’d never really looked at mine before. Turns out it’s a short-form certificate that refers to a long-form document that is filed with some governmental office in Pennsylvania (I was born in Pittsburgh — or so my parents tell me). I didn’t have to provide the long-form certificate; this one was fine. Nobody questioned it. I wonder why that is? Probably because I was a white guy applying for a driver’s license, not a black guy running as a Democrat for President of the United States. (Of course, nobody in any governmental capacity who works with such documents for a living ever questioned Obama’s short-form certificate either, because they’re not Teabagger idiots.)

But now we’ve had Donald Trump for weeks blathering on about this, saying things like “I’ve had people in Hawaii investigating this for weeks and they can’t believe what they’re finding!” And of course, no reporter challenges Trump on this: “What are they finding, Mr. Trump?” Of course, Trump is one of those people who just steamrolls his way through interviews, ignoring questions entirely, but reporters let it pass because it’s either let him do that, or don’t get the interview, and well, that‘s just not an option. Our media sucks. It really does. The whole “He said, she said” approach has been disastrous for the country. When one entire side of the political discourse is allowed to lie with impunity, we’re all screwed.

A perfect example of how debased the media is happened this week on the TODAY Show. At Obama’s press conference in which he scolded the media for focusing on the birth certificate idiocy instead of actual issues, he called out reported Chuck Todd by name. Next morning, there’s Todd on TODAY, doing a two-minute story on the birth certificate story, complete with “Here’s what Obama said, and now here’s Donald Trump’s reaction!”, because in this country we decide who gets to share the stage with the President of the United States by virtue of who’s loudest. At the end of Todd’s story, he finished up by saying: “Later today, the President will go to ____ to dicuss issue ____. Back to you, Meredith.” Chuck Todd’s response to being scolded by the President for focusing on stupid non-issues was to keep reporting on the non-issue of the day. It’s just embarrassing.

And it continues. Now the Teabaggers want to see Obama’s school transcripts. Why they should be demanding those is beyond me, since there’s no way they’d be voting for him anyway, whether he posted straight A’s or skirted through college with just a high enough GPA to not get kicked out.

But then, this is how the Right works in this country. Fifteen years ago, the fate of the nation hinged upon obscure land deals in Arkansas and an occasion or two of fellatio. I do think that racism is a big factor in all this crap, but the other large factor is simply that the Right will gear itself up to destroy any Democratic President. (Or any almost Democratic President — remember the Swift Boat Liars?)

Share This Post

A Rant.

I’ve got to get this rant out of my system, but I’ll hide it behind the fold. I’ll even conceal it so you have to highlight it with your mouse to read it.

OH MY GOD I AM SO F***ING SICK OR REWRITING THIS STUPID CHAPTER THAT I AM CLOSE TO SAYING THIS IS THE LAST TIME I’M GOING TO TRY AND AFTER THAT I’M JUST GOING TO STOP WRITING ENTIRELY FOREVER AND EVER UNTIL THE END OF TIME.

I feel better now.

Share This Post

Serious Congressman is Serious

Kevin Drum on the incredible courage of the Paul Ryan budget “plan”:

Ryan ignores Social Security because he knows privatization won’t fly and he doesn’t have the courage to propose a mainstream reform of the system that would be unpopular with conservative mandarins. He exempts seniors and baby boomers from his Medicare plan because he doesn’t have the courage to take on a powerful Republican voting bloc. He eschews details, basing the bulk of his plan on little more than theoretical spending caps, because he doesn’t have the courage to explain what his spending reductions would actually mean. He focuses most of his cuts on programs for the poor because he doesn’t have the courage to tackle weak claims rather than weak claimants. He gives the Pentagon a pass because he doesn’t have the courage to stand up to hawks in his own party. And above all else, he refuses to consider tax increases of any kind because he doesn’t have the courage to take on Grover Norquist and tell his own caucus what every genuinely serious analyst already knows: the only way to tackle the long-term deficit is with both tax hikes and spending cuts.

So explain to me: what’s courageous about a Republican congressman proposing spending cuts for the poor, entitlement cuts only in the far future, tax cuts for the rich today, and hands off the Pentagon forever? Nothing I can think of.

I also love the way this is all being framed as “necessary” to save us from the horrible budget crisis we’re facing. The Right has had a major hard-on for doing something like this for as long as the Right has existed in its current form in this country. Hiding their real motives behind budgetary excuses? Yeah, that’s pretty “courageous”, too. And “serious”.

Share This Post