Something for Thursday

This has been on my mind of late, which means it’s probably time to track down the movie and rewatch it: “Building the Barn”, from Witness. Music by Maurice Jarre.

Posted in On Music | Tagged | Leave a comment

Two photos from thirty years apart

As someone who focuses on results, I’m not seeing too much difference here.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged | Leave a comment

A new perspective

Posted in Photographic Documentation, Photography: The sky and things in it | Tagged | Leave a comment

Tuesday Tones

Today a long tone poem by composer Michael Kamen, who is famous for his film scores (HighlanderRobin Hood: Prince of ThievesThe Three Musketeers) as well as his work with many rock musicians, often providing orchestrations for their songs that required such services. One notable entry in this part of his oeuvre is the orchestra work on Pink Floyd’s album The Wall. Kamen had a wonderfully engaging musical voice, and his untimely death in 2003 when he was just 55 was a deeply hurtful blow to the music world.

This piece is called (in keeping with our ongoing “Moon” theme!) New Moon in the Old Moon’s Arms. Kamen cited as his inspiration for this work the Anasazi Tribe who flourished in the American southwest, and later disappeared, close to a thousand years ago. The piece is by turns contemplative and extroverted, rhythmic and lyrical, dance-like and song-driven. It’s very dramatic music with a lot of ebb and flow and contrasting musical textures thoughout.

The work’s title is an inversion of a phrase used sometimes to describe a very real astronomical phenomenon. Sometimes, during a new moon, when the visible part of the moon is just the barest sliver, the rest of the moon can be faintly seen in the reflected glow of the earth. This is typically called “Earthlight”, but another, possibly more poetic, term for it is “Old moon in the new moon’s arms”. Kamen seems to have intended his inverted title to hint at greeting the future in the light of the past.

Posted in On Music | Tagged | Leave a comment

Olev

LOVE sculpture, outside the Buffalo AKG Art Museum
Miranda (Lumix FZ1000ii)
f/11, 1/640sec, ISO200
Posted in On Buffalo and The 716, Photography: Streetscapes | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Abstract Water

Water of the Buffalo River at Canalside, Buffalo, NY
f/5.0, 1/4000sec, ISO 500
taken on Miranda (Lumix FZ1000ii)
Posted in Photography: Nature | Tagged | Leave a comment

Something for Thursday (Friday because I lost track of time yesterday edition)

I’ve been thinking about reviving my dormant Substack newsletter and one feature I’m thinking about is an occasional (maybe monthly) deep look at an entire album that I love or that has special significance to me, but I have no more thought through on the notion than that, so we’ll see. Meanwhile, here’s my favorite song from a candidate album: Enya’s 1989 record Watermark. The song is “On Your Shore”.

Posted in On Music | Tagged | 1 Comment

Blur

Carousel at Canalside, Buffalo, NY
Posted in On Buffalo and The 716, Photographic Documentation | Tagged , | Comments Off on Blur

Tuesday Tones

Continuing, but not completing, our exploration of classical music inspired by the Moon, we have a work that I have been waffling on whether or not to include…because it is not inspired by the Moon, even though it always shows up on such lists because it’s one of the heavy-hitters when it comes to “Moon music”. It’s one of the most famous pieces in all of classical music, to be honest. It is Ludwig van Beethoven’s Piano Sonata no. 14 in C-sharp minor, almost always called “the Moonlight Sonata”.

Why on Earth would I possibly exclude the Moonlight Sonata from a featured list of music inspired by the moon? Because there is no evidence at all that Beethoven was ever inspired by the moon when writing it. He didn’t name it “Moonlight”, after all; a poet named Ludwig Rellstab offered the appellation Moonlight Sonata in 1832, after Beethoven was already dead. For Beethoven, who didn’t do much with so-called “program music”, it’s doubtful that he had any particular scene or inspiration in mind for the sonata at all. He may have heard the comparison of the sonata to “moonlight” prior to his death, but that’s a tall order and isn’t supported by any actual evidence.

We’re also left with the work’s three-movement structure, typical for piano sonatas. If the whole sonata is called the Moonlight Sonata, does that mean that all three movements are to be taken as redolent of moonlight? I don’t know. The first movement, which breaks with sonata tradition in being slow and lyrical (usually the opening movements are the fast ones), is the best candidate for “moonlight”…but then there’s the second movement, a gentle and lilting minuet in triple time, which might also suggest moonlight in its graceful tones. And the third movement, which is stormy and even violent? Well, who knows…perhaps it’s the kind of moon that shines on a windy night at sea, or something like that.

All of this isn’t much of an exercise, anyway. Many musicians hate the idea of attaching extra-musical “meanings” to music that is inherently abstract, anyway, and if Beethoven had any particular point in mind, he surely would have written it in the margins of the manuscript. Or…maybe he wouldn’t. Beethoven was one of humanity’s towering artistic geniuses, clearly, but at the same time he was also a pretty strange man.

In the end, we’re left with the music. Is it really “moon music”? Maybe, maybe not. I lean toward “not”…but because of that name, we can’t really totally exclude it, either. As the founder of Gramophone, Compton Mackenzie, once said, “(W)hat these austere critics fail to grasp is that unless the general public had responded to the suggestion of moonlight in this music Rellstab’s remark would long ago have been forgotten.”

Here is the Piano Sonata no. 14 in C-sharp minor, “Moonlight”, by Ludwig van Beethoven.

Posted in On Music | Tagged | 1 Comment

Sunday Burst of Weirdness

How about we revisit an old feature that I used to run semi-regularly on this site? It’s the Sunday Burst of Weirdness, where I link an item or two that struck me during the previous week as “Wow, that’s really weird.”

We’re going to start with a guy in Britain who decided he was in the mood for cola-bottle gummies (these are gummy candies shaped like cola bottles and flavored like cola), so he bought a 3kg package of them and ate the entire package over three days. I had to look up the weight conversion, because I’m a non-metric American, what do I know about kilograms…that bag is over 6 pounds. Dude ate six pounds of gummy cola bottles in three days.

Did it go well? If it did, I wouldn’t be linking this at all!

Ouch.

Posted in On general matters of WTFery | Tagged | Comments Off on Sunday Burst of Weirdness