Thanks to Alan, I can just throw up a link to this article whenever I want to make plain my opinion of Ayn Rand. I only differ from that writer in that I thought Rand’s writing and thinking were crap while I was reading her; I was spared the “Rand’s a genius!” phase of life. Thank God.
Ach! I could’na seen that comin’!
Remember when the reactionary “Family Values” crowd (which is roughly contiguous with the “TAX CUTS SOLVE ALL PROBLEMS!!!” crowd) fell in love with Sarah Palin? Yeah, I remember that, too. Sad that it didn’t work out…but then, family values seem to be hardest for those who preach them.
Share This Post
Give the gift of film!
I’m having some trouble seeing what’s so awful about President Obama’s gift of twenty-five films (on DVD) to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Now, in terms of equivalence, it was probably a lesser gift than what Brown gave Obama (a pen-holder made from the wood of the sister ship of the vessel whose wood became the Oval Office desk, a first edition biography of Winston Churchill, and some toys for the kids), but a lot of people are acting as though this was an incredibly rude diplomatic faux pas.
I’m not bothered by it, though — not really. Now, a bunch of DVDs in a basket might have looked bad, so maybe they could have made this look better by putting them in a small chest made from some other ship’s wood or something. Maybe Obama could have had some of them signed by the respective filmmakers, or…well, I don’t know. But I don’t understand what’s so awful about giving someone copies of films, particularly these particular films, each of which is considered one of the finest American films ever made. Here’s the list:
“Casablanca”
“Chinatown”
“Citizen Kane”
“City Lights”
“E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial”
“It’s a Wonderful Life”
“Lawrence of Arabia”
“On the Waterfront”
“Psycho”
“Raging Bull”
“Schindler’s List”
“Singin’ in the Rain”
“Some Like It Hot”
“Star Wars: Episode IV”
“Sunset Boulevard”
“The General”
“The Godfather”
“The Graduate”
“The Grapes of Wrath”
“The Searchers”
“The Wizard of Oz”
“To Kill a Mockingbird”
“Vertigo”
I’m not sure on this, but I seem to recall reading at some point during the campaign that Obama is a film buff, so such a gift seems quite reasonable to me; giving copies of films is, to me, not unlike giving copies of favorite books. Now, films differ in that you can’t give anyone a “First Edition Star Wars“; it’s the same movie in everybody’s DVD collection, so maybe that’s why this gift seems so prosaic. But film is as fine an art form as any, and a gift of film doesn’t strike me as terribly odd, given that how fine the films in this list are.
Share This Post
What if they gave a war, and nobody invited me?
UPDATE: For the surprising number of people arriving here today via Google searches for “Scalzi” and “RaceFail”, welcome aboard. I’m not really the least bit interested in Racefail, but I hope some of you will stick around here anyway; I like to think that my blog doesn’t completely suck, and I always love to see new readers.
In the book The Art of STAR WARS, there’s a section devoted to portrayals of Star Wars in comic strips and editorial cartoons of 1977. One of these has Dennis the Menace standing at night with his friend, looking up at the stars, and Dennis says, “Well, if they do have wars, they’re awful quiet about it.”
One thing about the Internet that I never get used to is that there can be these massive conflicts going on in various sectors of Webspace, and yet, because I never go into those sectors or even have contact with those who do, I never know about them. If they do have flamewars, they’re awful quiet about it.
This morning I was going through my Google Reader subscriptions, got to John Scalzi’s, and found this kind-of cryptic post. Near as I can figure, someone decided to go into the comments threads of one of John’s other posts and toss in some content attacking someone else on this giant LiveJournal debate-flamewar that’s going on, for some unknown reason (probably an attempt to get someone memorialized badly on Google or something). John apparently doesn’t like to see his blog used for somebody else’s score-settling. Strange guy, that Scalzi. Musta been raised by wolves.
But I was intrigued, so I started doing a bit of searching, trying to figure out what on Earth is going on, and lo and behold, there really is some kind of scorched-earth thing going on that’s so big it’s got a name: “RaceFail”. According to this person, RaceFail is “a discussion about science fiction, fantasy, fandom, publishing, race, racism, power, and many other things.” Apparently it’s also a giant flamewar involving lots of attacks back and forth, people “outing” one another in various contexts, and…well, there it is.
Why am I posting about this? Mainly because it amuses me that big flamewars can go on without anyone else ever knowing about them. Same way the people involved in RaceFail probably never saw some of the knock-down dragouts we used to have on the FSM boards, back when I bothered hanging out there.
Of course, the Internet is made of people, and people are weird. It pretty much can’t be avoided, you know? So go on, you crazy kids. Have fun with that RaceFail thing!
Share This Post
But for the Grace….
Every year, it happens: someone forgets that their kid is in the car on a hot day while they go inside and do something, and the kid dies of hyperthermia. And every time it happens, the chorus comes: “How can anyone do this? What kind of awful person does this? How is this even possible?”
Here’s some insight into this phenomenon.
This is, as one might expect, a gut-wrenching story to read. Beware.
Share This Post
GO already.
I’m reading lately about a lot of people who think they need to “Go Galt” — people who are appalled at President Obama’s intention to allow the top tax rates in the US to return to what they were before Bush lowered them. He’ll allow them to return to the levels they were at during the 1990s, that horrible period of economic malaise and hardship that nobody in their right mind ever wants to repeat. What does “Go Galt” mean? Well, who knows, really. It refers to the colossally stupid premise of the colossally stupid, and yet oddly revered by right-wingers, book by Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, in which all the rich geniuses who run things pack up their stuff and go off to live in their own little rich Shangri-La while the rest of us all go belly-up or something. Yeah.
I’m reminded of something I was always taught when I was in restaurant management: when an employee, any employee, either threatens to quit or actually does quit, you always let them go. Nobody is ever irreplaceable. Nobody. The answer to the ultimatum-droppers was always the same: “Tomorrow morning we’re unlocking those doors and serving our customers and running our business whether you are here or not.” Well, the same thing applies to all the would-be John Galts out there: when you go, nobody’s going to much miss you. Your positions will be filled and the world will go on.
So, please, if you really want to Go Galt, then by all means, go. Have a nice time. Enjoy cleaning your own hotel rooms and cooking all your own meals and growing your own food and building your own roads to drive on and everything else. By all means, go. More for the rest of us.
Here’s DougJ from Balloon Juice on this:
These are good points, but I think there’s been too much emphasis on what idiots these people are and not enough on how childish they are. Quitting work because of a slight tax increase isn’t akin to anything from any sort of philosophy, not even one as crude and simplistic as Ayn Rand’s; it’s more akin to a child’s decision to take his ball and go home. It’s probably worse, though, since when a typical ten year-old gets home, stops crying, and wipes his nose, he doesn’t then fantasize about how the world will now suffer from the loss of his inestimable brilliance. I don’t know if Vincent Gallo is a Randian or not (it certainly wouldn’t surprise me if he was), but this quote summarizes Galtism in its current form perfectly: “I stopped painting in 1990 at the peak of my success just to deny people my beautiful paintings; and I did it out of spite.”
(Wow, is Vincent Gallo an ass or what? How many people out there actually feel as though their lives are lessened because he stopped painting? And he’s from Buffalo. Oh well, we can’t win ’em all.)
Of course, by “Going Galt” they’re not actually going anywhere. Some are talking about scheming to make less money so they won’t get taxed at the “new” rate (which, I point out again, is merely a resumption of the old rate). How dumb is that? If someone is actually scheming to make less money than they otherwise could because of some tax thing, it makes me wonder just what kind of genius they are in the first place.
The Right really needs to start fetishizing some better books.
Share This Post
Chicken Wing Soup
UPDATE 11-10-10: The most recent revision of this recipe is here. Check it out!
Denizens of Buffalo’s Southtowns may have eaten at a popular restaurant near Ralph Wilson Stadium called Danny’s (there’s also a location out by the airport), which is a really nifty place to eat — they’ve got the typical local menu of sandwiches, burgers, fish fry, steaks, and the like. They also have a soup and salad bar that is extremely popular. Now, the salad bar itself isn’t anything spectacular — just comforting typical salad bar stuff, right down to the deep-fried rice noodles — but the soups are terrific, especially the Chicken Wing Soup, which is downright legendary in these parts. It’s literally like eating Buffalo-style chicken wings with a spoon. Uncanny.
Well, I figured that the stuff can’t be that hard to make, right? It’s not that complicated-tasting of a soup, so I decided to give it my best shot. I did a bit of Googling, and I found one recipe that looks quite good, but that recipe basically involves a milk-and-sour cream base, whereas I was pretty sure that the stuff at Danny’s uses a broth or stock of some kind, even though it does have a creamy texture. So I made it up myself, and here’s how I did it.
1 lb chicken breast meat
6 tbs butter
6 tbs flour
Dash pepper
1 onion, diced
2 stalks celery, diced
4 cups chicken stock
1 cup milk
1 cup sour cream
Lots of Frank’s Red Hot Sauce (use to taste)
First, I cooked the chicken meat. I had some breast tenders that I cut into bite-sized chunks; then I seasoned these with salt and pepper and tossed them into my soup pot to cook in a couple of tablespoons of olive oil. Once the chicken was nicely browned, I transferred it to the crockpot, whereupon I doused the chicken with a liberal helping of the Frank’s Red Hot and let it sit while I made the liquid base for the soup.
OK, back to the soup pot. Step one: make a roux. I melted the six tablespoons of butter in the pot, and then added the flour and ground pepper a bit at a time, stirring constantly for a few minutes to make a blond roux. When the roux was the color of caramel, I threw in my diced onions and celery and sauteed those veggies until they were moderately browned and tender. This took about three or four minutes.
At this point, I added the chicken stock at once and turned up the heat, to slowly bring the stock to a boil. Once it was nice and hot (about ten minutes) I added the milk and sour cream, in order to create a nice creamy texture to the soup. Then I started dumping in liberal amounts of Frank’s Red Hot. This I suppose one does to taste, although one should be careful, since in my experience, spicy dishes tend to get spicier as they age in the fridge over a day or two. I got it nicely spicy, though, and then I poured the whole shebang into the crock pot over the chicken, gave all a stir, and then put the lid on. With the crock pot set on “Low”, I then walked away for three hours.
The pic above is what it looked like when I dished it up and added my garnish of garlic croutons. The taste? I loved it! Really good. I couldn’t be happier with this maiden effort, although I do have some notions for next time:
:: I think I’d prefer my chicken to have a more shredded texture, so I think next time I’ll roast a couple of whole chicken breasts and then shred the meat before tossing it into the pot. I only used the breast tenders because that’s what I had at hand. I suppose you could use any leftover chicken, huh? This might be a good way to use the leftover meat from a rotisserie bird.
:: I know I said to be careful with the hot sauce, but I don’t think I added enough. Next time, more is going into the pot. I might try using the bottle of Anchor Bar Wing Sauce I’ve had in my cupboard for a year, too.
:: I’m not sure if the soup was thick enough. I may make more roux next time for greater thickness.
:: And I can’t remember for the life of me if the soup at Danny’s has potato in it! Now I have to go eat there sometime and figure that out.
So there’s my initial formula for Chicken Wing Soup. It’s not exactly like Danny’s, but I think it’s a good starting point. Give it a try!
(I’ve posted photos of the soup-making process on Flickr, here.)
Share This Post
From the Books
A series wherein I post longer excerpts from books I’ve read.
I’ve been toying with the notion of writing a film script, as a different kind of challenge. I haven’t worked in the screenplay format since many years ago, when I was writing Star Wars fanfic; those stories I wrote as scripts. (OK, to tell the truth, I’ve already been tinkering with screenplay format, producing a script for a movie about an unemployed writer-type, down on his luck in life, who starts over from scratch in his mid-thirties by taking a job as a janitor in a grocery store. You know, fantasy. That project is unlikely to ever see the light of day, though.)
The script that I really want to write, though, is an idea that’s been kicking around my head for several years now. It always surprises me that there really aren’t a whole lot of movies out there about classical music and the people from its history. Sure, there’s Amadeus, but what else is there? Just reading through just about any composer’s life reveals a world ripe for harvesting of stories, and hey, the soundtracks would pretty much select themselves, right?
Anyhow, one might think that I’d be hankering to write a movie about Hector Berlioz, and maybe that’ll come one day, but the story that’s capturing my attention now is what may be the most important love story in classical music history: that of Robert and Clara Schumann. Their story is passionate, romantic, and tragic, and it saw the production of some of the most lyrical music of the Romantic era. What a great costume drama that would make!
The basic facts are these. Robert Schumann was one of the most archetypal of all Romantic-era figures. His life was fairly short (46 years), he fought madness and alcoholism all his life, he attempted suicide twice in his life, and eventually died in a sanitarium two years after his second suicide attempt (in which he was pulled from the Rhine river by fisherman after he had flung himself into it). He was also one of the greatest composers of the Romantic era, and a noted music critic as well, producing some of the most enduring piano music, art songs, and concertos of all time. His symphonies are also staples of the orchestral repertoire.
Through all this was Clara, whom he met when she was just a child, and yet he courted her anyway, to the chagrin of her father, who tried to keep his daughter from a man he respected but still saw as a lunatic (not entirely inaccurately, either), until the two finally wed after a lengthy court battle. Their marriage was loving and devoted, but not without trial; Clara was one of the great piano virtuosos of the nineteenth century, but her career had to be put on hold so Robert could compose. She would endure ten pregnancies and lose three children, and when she eventually lose Robert as well, she would live another forty years after his death. Her deep friendship with Johannes Brahms forms an interesting postscript to her marriage to Robert Schumann; Brahms would never marry, and many have speculated that this was because he was in love with Clara his entire life. (No evidence exists that their relationship ever became physical.)
So, of late, I’ve been doing some preliminary research into the lives of Robert and Clara Schumann, including reading their letters, which have been gathered into a two-volume collection, edited by Eva Weissweiler. These letters are illuminating in many ways. Letters tend to be the most revealing of all writings from decades (or centuries) gone by, and in this age of quick e-mails or notes hastily scrawled on a Post-It, it’s amazing to read these long missives and remember that correspondence was more than just a way for people apart to keep in touch with one another; letter-writing was a major way of passing time in an age when any form of entertainment other than reading entailed dressing up and leaving home. People were literary because they had to be, lest they die of boredom. It’s tempting to read these letters and think “Wow, people back then really knew how to be in love”, but I’m not sure it’s the passion that’s changed, just the expression of it. But it’s impossible to read these letters and not feel the passion radiating from them, in some cases 170 years after they were written and dispatched to secret intermediaries (lest Clara’s father find them and put their relationship to a definitive end).
Here are a few passages from their letters that stood out for me.
Clara to Robert, January 1838
But don’t think that I am angry with you for this; on the contrary, I am happy to know that you don’t love me because of my talent, but, as you once wrote on a little piece of paper, “I don’t love you because you are a great artist; no, I love you, because you are so kind.” That please me immensely, and I have never forgotten it.
…
You cannot lose me; that would be impossible; my spirit would follow you forever.
Robert to Clara, February 1838
“Sometimes it feels as if a great many alleys were running pell mell through my heart and as if my thoughts and feelings were bustling about in there in all directions and running back and forth, just as people do, and they were asking one another, “Where does this one lead?” – to Clara – “and this one?” – to Clara – everything leads to you. The business with the alleys in the heart is a curious thought, isn’t it? And they sometimes lead to the lips and suddenly tehere’s a kiss, and the lovely girl snuggles up to the man, and their names are Clara and Robert–“
Clara to Robert, March 1838
What would you like me to do, my dear Robert? Should I embrace you, should I give your hand a hearty squeeze, should I cry, should I laugh? I am in the mood to do all of these things, because your latest letters were so precious, as cheerful as the loveliest spring.
…
I am very bored with traveling now; I am longing very much for rest; how much I would like to compose, but I can’t do that here at all. I have to practice in the morning, and we have visitors until late in the evening; then I am completely exhausted, as you surely see from my letters because they often indicate that my head is totally empty. –But you should always recognize my heart, because it remains untouched by the events of the day. If I can compose something for the journal, I will. “Macbeth” appears to be very beautiful; –I don’t think that anything of mine would compare favorably to it. I am like you. There are many alleys running through my heart, too, but they are even narrower, and there are more of them.
My mind has hardly investigated one of them when it encounters the next one, and so on, ad infinitum. I cannot stay with one idea; right away there is another one – the fault is yours alone – I don’t know what this will lead to, I always console myself by thinking that I am a woman, and they weren’t born to compose. I often doubt myself. But I remember that you did not want to speak of doubts anymore; I agree with you! Doubt is a disastrous word and also a disastrous state to be in.
Robert to Clara, March, 1838
Where should I begin to tell you what kind of person you are making of me, my love, magnificent one! Your letter provided me with one delight after another. What a life you’re opening before me, what prospects! Sometimes when I read through your letter I feel like the first human might have felt when the angel led him through the new creation, from peak to peak; each beautiful region followed by even more beautiful ones, and the angel then says, “All of this shall be yours.”
I’m not sure how I’d use these; maybe in the typical way of having them read as voiceovers. I haven’t really given much thought at all as to the form such a film might take; this is all just preliminary stuff, and I don’t know if I’ll ever even get around to writing this. But I hope to.
This much I do know: the end credits must roll, at least in part, as “Traumerei” plays. Here is “Traumerei”, played by Vladimir Horowitz in Moscow in 1988. He often played “Traumerei” as an encore.
What a love story Robert and Clara had!
Share This Post
Sentential Links #161
Click:
:: Chances are if we’ve ever been outside together, drinking a beer, I might have fallen in love with you. (Luckily I never drank beer outside with her; I’d have likely been the exception to her rule. Oh well….)
:: I hate to think that our civilization could be lost because we’d digitized our culture.
:: We are all online, to one degree or another, varying mainly in how much privacy we want to preserve, how much space between ourselves and our work, and between ourselves and our public. The dynamic between authors and readers is fundamentally altered by all of this. George Martin may end up having to post his daily workouts, down to calories burned, weights lifted, pulse rates before and after. With video, to prove it. It has probably been suggested to him already. (Not a blog post, but an article by Guy Gavriel Kay about the recent “Hey GRRM, howzabout a little less conventionin’ and a little more writin’!” flap.)
:: If I had run out of The Crying Game screaming “The chick’s a dude!” as people were waiting to see it for the first time, it would be a case of justifiable homicide. But now, in 2009? Sorry, man. You missed your window to be outraged. (I just want it noted that I brought part of this subject up first, but since I have several orders of magnitude fewer readers than John Scalzi does, he gets all the glory. Harumph.)
:: Thanks for not eating me. (A plug for my favorite webcomic ever. Seriously, if you haven’t read The Abominable Charles Christopher yet, please oh please go read it from the beginning.)
More next week. Tune in, Star Warriors!!!
Share This Post
Unidentified Earth #59
Well, I’m claiming victory on UI 55. This is a section of the Youghiogheny River in southwestern Pennsylvania, which is referred to locally as “the loop”, for obvious reasons. This is one of the most popular whitewater boating rivers in the northeast, and the run here begins just below the falls at Ohiopyle and then proceeds seven or eight miles downstream. Alternatively, boaters can park in Ohiopyle and do just “the Loop”, taking their boats back out at the far end of the Loop and hiking back up to their cars. Fun wow!
And I have no guesses for UI 58, either, so time for hints. This site was a movie location. If you were to approach the fictional locale filmed here, you should not expect a warm welcome.
With that, we come to the newest installment:
Where are we? Rot-13 your guesses, folks!


