Never minded….

Yesterday I mentioned that my birthday is also the date of release for The Beatles’ Abbey Road. Sheila O’Malley points out that just a couple of days earlier is the date of release of Nirvana’s Nevermind, the seminal album from 1991 that changed the landscape of rock music for good.

Here’s the thing: I never liked Nirvana. I didn’t hate Nirvana, mind you. But Nirvana made absolutely zero impact on me, one way or the other. It was the strangest thing: a cultural touchstone that slid right past me, and to this day, it remains a touchstone that remains outside my own experience. I eventually came to the Beatles, but I’m not sure that I’ll ever come to Nirvana.

Part of it was the timing: I was in college, which you might think would make me more attuned to this kind of thing at the time, but I was studying music at the time, and my musical passions were almost entirely focused on classical music. At the time I hadn’t started exploring Celtic music, and I’d stopped listening to rock almost entirely. I was totally unaware of that Nirvana was, what they represented in terms of the evolution of rock music, how they represented a break from what had gone before…all of it. Nirvana was, for me, a band with an album. Same as any other band with an album.

Part of this, though, was something else, something that I’ve been mulling over for a while. I’ve come to realize over the last few years that one of my personal idiosyncrasies is that I just don’t tend to explore movements in popular culture as they’re happening. Books come out that are viewed almost immediately as deeply important, no matter the genre, and I just file them away for future reference. Ditto movies, and music, and even teevee shows. Highly-regarded fantasy novels come out, and it takes me years to get around to reading them (The Lies of Locke Lamora, The Name of the Wind). I like Stephen King, but of his last dozen or so novels, I’ve only read Lisey’s Story (post forthcoming), and I’ve never read any of his Dark Tower books. I yield to no one in my love of Star Wars…and yet I haven’t read a single “Extended Universe” novel in fifteen years.

Music? I couldn’t even tell you what I’ve missed. At work, a couple friends and I like to play with Internet trivia quizzes when we’re on lunch break. Sometimes we do music quizzes — “Identify the song clip” and that sort of thing — and when we do, I’m generally useless for answers once we get to music past, say, 1990. Oddly, I’m more well-versed now in pop music than I’ve been in years, mainly through osmosis from what The Daughter listens to.

Teevee is the same way. I’ve yet to watch a single episode of The Wire, Mad Men, Breaking Bad, Sons of Anarchy, or even The Sopranos. And I’m not sure I ever will, because at this point I’m not sure my interests will ever take me there. And that’s what it’s all about, really — the fact that I tend to follow my interests with little or no regard for what the “cultural movements” are. This isn’t to say that I deliberately avoid what’s popular; I know people who do that, and I think it’s silly — I tend to see a lot of validity in the “fifty million Elvis fans can’t be wrong” argument — but when I note things that are popular, my reaction tends to be, “Huh. File that away for future reference.”

Anyway, happy anniversary, Nirvana and Nevermind.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Never minded….

  1. Cal's Canadian Cave of Coolness says:

    I enjoy rejecting things that are hugely popular for the very reason they are popular. I have not and will not ever watch E.T. I only got into LOST in the last season and discovered that I liked discovering shows after they have gone off the air or in their final seasons like THE SHIELD or THE CLOSER. I know I have to see a movie within a few weeks of it's release.

  2. Roger Owen Green says:

    Nirvana and Pearl Jam were probably the last bands for which I have multiple albums. (As opposed to singer-songwriter types). That's when I realized I was getting older.

  3. Kelly Sedinger says:

    Cal: I continue to be befuddled by your refusal to watch ET. Surely there comes a time when "popularity status" gives way to "classic status"? Seems to me that when something displays that much staying power — the movie's almost 30 years old — it means something more than "It appeals to the masses". I mean, if the story simply doesn't appeal to you or you don't think it's your cuppa, that's one thing — but if you simply avoid what's popular because it's popular, while you do avoid some crap, you also miss some very good stuff.

Comments are closed.