Tuesday Tones

Posted on November 25, 2025 by ksedinger

Here’s something I didn’t know until today when I was driving home: English composer Frederick Delius lived for a time in Florida in the 1880s, during which he managed a local orange grove while he studied with a noted organist in Jacksonville. From this stay arose one of Delius’s most popular works, The Florida Suite. We’re only concerning ourselves with one movement from the suite, because our focus in this series right now is music inspired by water.

The orange grove Delius managed was on the St. Johns River, which is the longest river in Florida, running over 300 miles from headwaters south of Orlando to its mouth near Jacksonville. The river runs parallel to the seacoast, and it’s actually a fascinating river to track on Google Earth, as it winds back and forth and into and out of large lakes along its path.

Since the St. Johns doesn’t have much elevation drop at all, its flow is generally slow and sometimes even ebbs with the shifting of the tides. Thus Delius’s work, which paints a tone picture of life along a slowly moving waterway. There is little drama here, just the slow life spent along a slow river.

Posted in On Music | Tagged | Comments Off on Tuesday Tones

Another Sunday quiz-thing as I sip my coffee to the sound of a snoring greyhound and cats doing…cat stuff

Posted on November 23, 2025 by ksedinger

This one‘s pretty quick and easy!

1) Has anyone ever told you “I love you” but you didn’t say it back?

 

I don’t think so.

2) Do you consider yourself organized?

 

Hahahaha! No. I try, but I do not think I’ll ever really get there.

3) Where do you look first when you go clothes shopping?
 

“How well does this go with overalls?” or, “Which pair of overalls would I most likely pair with this?”

Seriously, that’s how I think, and that’s how I think most people should think when they’re shopping for clothes. Figure out how the item fits into what you already have. And if it doesn’t, think about how if you’re really willing to launch a new fashion concept in your wardrobe. (Hey, if you ARE looking for a new concept to freshen things up, awesome! Have fun!)

4) Do you often reflect on your past in terms of eras or milestones (“it’s been 10 years since X happened”)?
 

Yes, I do, more and more. I try to not do it as much as I’m tempted to do, because as the years pile up, I notice them piling up faster and faster, and the perspective across those years seems different. It’s wild to think about how specific periods of time feel now versus when I was much younger. Take, randomly, “eleven years”. Eleven years ago, we were new to living in this house, we had just adopted our first dog (Hi, Cane! [waves at the Rainbow Bridge]), and more specifically, we were digging out from the biggest snowstorm we had yet experienced. That feels very, very recent, but it’s eleven years ago.

Now, take another eleven-year period from my youth: Superman: The Movie came out in late 1978. Eleven years later, in late 1989, I was in college and I had met (purely as an acquaintance, she was not even remotely on my radar at that time as someone I might want to invite to a movie or something) a girl who would later become The Girlfriend and later on, The Wife.

Two different eleven-year-periods. One feels compressed. The other, even now, feels like an epic journey through time and space. Time is wild.

5) Were you more recently ill or injured (flu vs. twisted ankle)?
 

Definitely the former, though I’m not even sure when that would have been. It was almost certainly a minor cold, and it’s been a while since I even had one of those. (Oh, I just got my annual flu shot the other day! Next up is my annual COVID booster–that’s “the jab”, for all you weirdos out there who think Ivermectin is a thing–and at some point very soon I have to think about getting my shingles shots. And by “think about”, I mean, I have to get off my ass and get my shingles shots.)

By the way, one very convenient aspect of getting older is that you don’t even have to do anything for injuries to happen! Your back can throw itself out when you’re just standing there, not trying to lift a damned thing! That’s really quite a timesaver, innit?

Posted in Occasional Quizzes | Tagged | 1 Comment

It’s so bright here on the outside….

Posted on November 22, 2025 by ksedinger

Wow! I didn’t actually plan to take four days of break from posting here; I had a nice little streak going there, too! But, that’s what happens. Truth to tell, I spent four days in jail for faking my car’s registration and inspection stickers with a Sharpie. Oops!

OK, no, that wasn’t me. But what a story, eh? As President Josiah Bartlet once noted, “Some of the stupidest criminals in the world are working right here in America. I’ve always been very proud of that.”

Anyway, yes, I’m still kicking with a pulse and everything. Nothing major, just the usual stuff of “Busy at work, quite a bit to do at home”. Not that anyone asked, which come to think of it, I now find a little rude!

Posted in Life | Tagged | Comments Off on It’s so bright here on the outside….

Tuesday Tones

Posted on November 18, 2025 by ksedinger

A month or two ago when I was doing a series of music posts using music inspired by the moon, one post featured a work by Italian composer Ludovico Einaudi. As I seem to do whenever I find a new piece (new to me, anyway) by Einaudi, I always end up saying something like “I need to explore Einaudi’s music more!” And then I don’t, really, until the next time I’m looking for inspiration.

Which brings us to the current series, which is “Music inspired by water”.

Yes, I need to listen to the album this comes from, which is apparently highly regarded; it’s called In A Time Lapse. Yes, I need to listen to more Einaudi.

I haven’t found anything specific about this track, just its title, but it’s called “Waterways”, so that counts. Right? And it’s hypnotically beautiful. Kind of like a waterway.

Posted in On Music | Tagged | 1 Comment

Do you have submechanophobia, Charlie Brown?

Posted on November 17, 2025 by ksedinger

I never knew about a thing called submechanophobia until we traveled to Hawaii in 2021, and The Daughter reacted very strongly against the idea of going to the Pearl Harbor Memorial and seeing the Arizona. The idea of looking down at a sunken ship freaked her out. I looked it up and I learned that this is very real.

Here’s a video I saw online today:

@kwinmorris

October paddling!

♬ original sound – Kwin

Apparently this is a shipwreck off the shore of Tobermory, Ontario. Tobermory is a town at the end of Bruce Peninsula, which extends into Lake Huron, and from what I have found out, there are around twenty shipwrecks in those waters. (We may have just finished noting the power of Lake Superior, but there are four other Great Lakes, and each one has done in its fair share of ships.)

I’ve never found myself looking down at a shipwreck in clear water before (we couldn’t even visit the Arizona! there was a problem with the docks for the boats that go over to it), so I don’t know how eerie I would find this, but while I do not suffer from the phobia in question, I can certainly see why it’s a phobia. Human-made stuff isn’t supposed to be down there, after all, and human-made things in the incorrect context can be creepy indeed…plus it’s a reminder that there’s a whole part of our world, that comprises most of our world, that we can’t visit without help and for small amounts of time.

I remember one such instance when I was a kid. My parents started canoeing heavily when I was 10 or 11, and I often accompanied them on these expeditions. One favorite waterway was the Allegheny Reservoir, which is a large lake in both New York and Pennsylvania, created by the erection in 1965 of the Kinzua Dam near Warren, PA. The reservoir is over 20 miles long, and it flooded valleys and caused the ends of a number of hamlets and villages as it filled.

One afternoon we were canoeing at Willow Bay, one of the reservoir’s many inlets. Since the Allegheny had been dammed at Kinzua in 1965, my father had been through the region before its flooding and remembered it. Thanks to a sign near the boat launch indicating the former site of a village, my father knew that he had driven through the place where we were paddling…and minutes later he looked down to see, just a few feet below the water, a road.

And that road is still visible today on Google Earth. Here is Willow Bay. Note the road, what’s left of it, emerging from the woods overgrowing it and then plunging, straight as an arrow, beneath the waters of the artificial lake.

What have you seen in the water?

Posted in On Nature | Tagged | 1 Comment

I am just now realizing that I never said anything about the passing of Dick Cheney

Posted on November 16, 2025 by ksedinger

Well…that’s that, then. I hope he said hello to Kissinger on his way to the lake of fire.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , | 1 Comment

A Saturday Morning Quiz Thing

Posted on November 15, 2025 by ksedinger

Here’s a quiz from Sunday Stealing! I’m doing this because it’s early Saturday morning and I’m sitting here with a mug of tea and I don’t really want to do anything productive quite yet but I need to post something (I’m sitting on a nice little string of consecutive days posting stuff!), so here we go:

What 10 Questions Can Tell You the Most about a Person

1. If you were an animal, what animal would you be?

Well…I’m prone to long periods of inactivity punctuated by short bursts of activity, and I can be motivated by food, so I guess I’d be a greyhound. Huh.

2. Are you generous?

I certainly hope so! I constantly wish I had more resources to support all the things that need supporting. (And people.)

3. Of the following, which consistently gives you the most pleasure: a) music, b) money, c) books, d) science, e) spirituality, f) food and wine, g) movies?

Sheesh, I love all those things! Maybe not spirituality, but I suppose it would depend on how we define that. I certainly enjoy the sense of community and participation in humanity that all the other things bring. And money isn’t something I love, but I sure love that having it brings the ability to pursue all the other things. Oh, and I’d add photography and other visual arts, too.

(By the way, maybe this belongs in a longer essay, but “Money can’t buy happiness!” is complete and utter bullshit and anyone saying it should be laughed out of the room.)

4. Describe your dancing ability.

I don’t have any. I probably could, as I have a fine sense of rhythm, but I have never danced much. Now, if I was to ever take an actual class in dance, I suspect I’d be OK at it. At least, not “Elaine Benes” bad.

5. What do you think your worst enemy really thinks of you?

“That guy is a liberal pinko weirdo with no fashion sense and isn’t manly enough.” (Now, I have no idea who is thinking this, but if I had a “worst enemy”, this is probably at least part of their thought process.)

6. Can you tell when someone is lying to you?

Depends on the person and the lie, doesn’t it?

7. Describe how it feels to fall in love.

Well, your brain kind of goes all foggy and your thoughts go all “What if I did this weird thing I would never otherwise do? Would that impress that person?” and people are often doing the snapping-fingers-in-your-face thing to get your attention because once again you’re thinking about the oh-so-cute thing that person did the other day and how you really want to revisit the lovely conversation you had with them that time so you cook up all manner of weird conversational gambits to get that topic back again. Oh, and there can be uncomfortable bloating, too. Be careful. A thing of Tums helps.

8. In deadly peril, what three people would you want in a foxhole with you?

Superman, Wonder Woman, and Captain America.

9. What is your greatest weakness?

Well, my sweet tooth doesn’t do me any favors. And I’m likely to pay a lot less heed to your character flaws if you look good in a pair of overalls.

10. If you were to live out the rest of your life as your favorite fictional character, which would you choose?

I could cheerfully live as Bilbo Baggins, in all honesty. Books and food and warm fires? And some of the hobbits wear something similar to overalls!

Posted in Occasional Quizzes | Tagged | 1 Comment

“Momentary masters of a fraction of a dot”

Posted on November 14, 2025 by ksedinger

Earth, from the rings of Saturn:

“In this rare image taken on July 19, 2013, the wide-angle camera on NASA’s Cassini spacecraft has captured Saturn’s rings and our planet Earth and its moon in the same frame. It is only one footprint in a mosaic of 33 footprints covering the entire Saturn ring system (including Saturn itself). At each footprint, images were taken in different spectral filters for a total of 323 images: some were taken for scientific purposes and some to produce a natural color mosaic. This is the only wide-angle footprint that has the Earth-moon system in it.”

Via, with more info, here.

Posted in On Science and the Cosmos | Tagged | Comments Off on “Momentary masters of a fraction of a dot”

Something for Thursday

Posted on November 13, 2025 by ksedinger

We all have those movies, don’t we? They’re the movies where we’ll be going about our day, doing stuff that we’ve planned out and intended to get done…but then we’ll see that one of those movies is on teevee or something, and that’s that, screw the To Do List, we’re watching that movie again!

One of those movies for me is The Hunt for Red October, that wonderful submarine thriller based on the Tom Clancy novel. (I never read that particular Clancy book. I read a couple other ones and honestly, I wasn’t super-impressed beyond an appreciation for his plotting. My drug-of-choice for late-80s-early-90s spy fiction was Robert Ludlum.) Hunt came out in spring 1990, and I remember a bunch of friends and I in college going to see it. The movie rocked my world even then, and it has never declined in my estimation. It really is a masterpiece, as far as I’m concerned; it sets up every single plot twist in advance but doesn’t do so in such an obvious way that you can see the foreshadowing as it happens. It’s incredibly well-acted and superbly paced, and for an action adventure thriller, it has some absolutely crackling dialog. I just love it.

The music is also great, by the wonderful Basil Poledouris. Its main melodic material is distinctly Russian, and he makes extensive use of choir throughout, along with some techno material in the tense parts of the film. Here is a suite culled together from the soundtrack.

Posted in On Movies, On Music | Tagged | Comments Off on Something for Thursday

What about a very tall garden shed?

Posted on November 12, 2025 by ksedinger

There’s a social media account called “Terrible Maps” which is exactly that: absurd maps, where the absurdity either comes from the weirdness of the information being mapped, or just plain meta-absurdity. Here is a version of the latter:

And here is a version of the former:

Now, I like the fact that this one doesn’t include the caption, because you’re probably wondering what on Earth Florida, Louisiana, and Illinois have in common. What could possibly group those three states, and no others?

Here, I’ll even provide a bit of quiz-show music to play while you think about it:

Give up?

Think altitude.

Got it yet?

The map depicts states where, if you stand atop that state’s tallest building, your elevation will be higher than if you stood on that state’s highest natural point. Apparently this is only true in these three states. Illinois is pretty obvious: the Sears Tower (Willis Tower? Something else? Nah, Sears Tower it is) is taller than “Charles Mound”, the state’s highest hill. Now, having driven through Illinois a lot, I found this a little surprising when I considered the hilly terrain along the state’s western side. But those hills are actually plateaus with valleys from the rivers and streams forming the Mississippi River watershed. And the southern part of Illinois is too far west to benefit, elevation-wise, from the Appalachians.

I didn’t look up Louisiana or Florida’s tallest buildings, but their natural high points are quite low: Driskill Mountain’s 535 feet and Britton Hill at 345 feet, respectively. Florida is so flat that I’ll bet there are a lot of buildings that reach a higher elevation than Britton Hill there. Even NASA’s Vehicle Assembly Building is taller than that.

I would have thought there were more states that fit this bill, to be honest. Iowa, for example. It turns out that Iowa is short-changed (ha!) by the relative lack of height in the Des Moines skyline, but if Iowa wanted to join the other three here, it wouldn’t take much: one building in Des Moines just 86 feet or more taller than that city’s current tallest building would do it. (For the purposes of this post, I assume that meeting the challenge would involve the state’s biggest city. They could build a tower that tall in Mason City, after all…but that would be really weird.)

Could New York do it? Unlikely, as New York State’s highest point is a mountain in the Adirondacks that is more than 5300 feet high. Nobody’s building a mile-high building any time soon, I think.

So, just thinking about this, which states could do this most realistically? Well, I assume the entire Western seaboard is out; nobody in California, Oregon, or Washington is going to build a tower that gives greater elevation than Mts. Whitney, Hood, or Rainier, respectively. I thought maybe Massachusetts could do it, but it turns out that the western end of that state is more rugged than I remember (I haven’t been to Massachusetts in 28 years). How about Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey, and Delaware? Those are flat, aren’t they? Well, not really:

  • Connecticut: Mt. Frissell, 2380 feet
  • Rhode Island: Jerimoth Hill, 812 feet
  • New Jersey: High Point (creatively named!), 1803 feet
  • Delaware: Ebright Azimuth, 448 feet (rounded up)

The biggest cities of each are elevated as follows:

  • Hartford, CT: 59 feet
  • Providence, RI: 75 feet
  • Newark, NJ: 30 feet
  • Wilmington, DE: 92 feet

Well, it’s pretty obvious that Hartford is not going to be erecting a 2322-foot skyscraper anytime soon. Neither is Newark likely to build a 1774-foot building. But all Providence would need is a 738-foot building to get this job done (their current tallest building is 428 feet, so this would dominate the skyline). And looking things up, I wonder if Delaware actually does belong on this list! The base elevation is 92 feet, and their tallest building is 360 feet, which means that, assuming the base of 1201 North Market Street is at the 92-foot elevation mark, its roof must stand at 452 feet, a whole 4 feet higher than Ebright Azimuth. Hmmmm.

Now I’m wondering how much of this the Terrible Maps folks actually researched. I’m also wondering why I’ve spent so much time on this.

Posted in On Things I Find Funny | Tagged | 1 Comment