Sunday Burst of Weirdness

Weirdness on Da Web!

:: I kind of wish I liked the sound of handbell choirs more than I do (generally, my attention flags after just a couple of minutes of handbells), because to watch a good handbell choir is always fascinating. It looks easy enough — it’s just a bunch of people ringing bells — but they have to ring the right bells at the right time, so if their timing is off, the entire tune will falter. This gets more impressive the more complicated the music is. In college we had a handbell choir that did religious music exclusively, but I generally find handbells more fun to hear if they’re doing something offbeat, such as…the Main Theme to the Pirates of the Caribbean movies!

:: For baseball fans, it’s always worth remembering what an entertaining jerk Rickey Henderson was:

In the early 1980s, the Oakland A’s accounting department was freaking out. The books were off $1 million. After an investigation, it was determined Rickey was the reason why. The GM asked him about a $1 million bonus he had received and Rickey said instead of cashing it, he framed it and hung it on a wall at his house.

Actually, messing with the heads of accountants is always good fun, so I can’t hold this one against Rickey. And I always found something admirable about the fact that Henderson wanted to play so badly that toward the end he was playing semi-pro ball. After all, to paraphrase Annie Savoy, you gotta respect a ballplayer just tryin’ to finish out the season.

:: OK, time for a little Star Trek bitching. At the risk of sounding like a deranged fan, this interview with one of the producers of the new movie — via AICN — presents what has got to be the laziest excuse for the movie cheerfully ignoring established canon that could possibly be cooked up. I would actually respect them more if they just said “We wanna start over with the same characters and do our own thing and screw your canon, so how do ya like that”, but instead we get a whole bunch of goofy babble about how quantum physics establishes that there are infinite possible timelines, so they’re just in a brand new timeline! Oh, come on. This is just dumb. Maybe we should use quantum physics to generate a timeline where we could finally see if an Imperial Star Destroyer could take out the Enterprise.

More next week.

Share This Post

Between two and three days of my life I’ll never get back

I’ve seen this “Alphabet Movie” meme-thing on a lot of blogs, in which you basically pick one movie for each letter of the alphabet. Here are the rules for this game (as quoted from SamuraiFrog, from when he did the game):

1. Pick one film to represent each letter of the alphabet.

2. The letter “A” and the word “The” do not count as the beginning of a film’s title, unless the film is simply titled A or The, and I don’t know of any films with those titles.

3. Return of the Jedi belongs under “R,” not “S” as in Star Wars Episode IV: Return of the Jedi. This rule applies to all films in the original Star Wars trilogy; all that followed start with “S.” Similarly, Raiders of the Lost Ark belongs under “R,” not “I” as in Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark. Conversely, all films in the LOTR series belong under “L” and all films in the Chronicles of Narnia series belong under “C,” as that’s what those filmmakers called their films from the start. In other words, movies are stuck with the titles their owners gave them at the time of their theatrical release. Use your better judgement to apply the above rule to any series/films not mentioned.

4. Films that start with a number are filed under the first letter of their number’s word. 12 Monkeys would be filed under “T.”

5. Link back to Blog Cabins in your post so that I can eventually type “alphabet meme” into Google and come up #1, then make a post where I declare that I am the King of Google.

6. If you’re selected, you have to then select 5 more people.

Since I myself wasn’t tagged, I’m ignoring rules 5 and 6. Also, I decided to do this differently after I saw the twist that “Superwife” put on it: she listed one bad movie for each letter of the alphabet! And hey, it’s always fun to rip on movies I don’t like, so here we go.

But again, I’m doing bad movies. (By the way, Badmovies.org was a nice resource for browsing through lists of titles of movies I’d forgotten I’d seen, as a way of jogging the memory. Resurrecting bad memories, that is. Gee, thanks, guys!

A is for Armageddon. It’s a ridiculous film. As SF, it is complete dreck; for this little scientific accuracy in a movie, you might just as well watch a space fantasy like Star Wars and have done with it. But, as I’ve noted before, Armageddon is the lava lamp of movies: I can’t stop watching the thing whenever I find it on the teevee. Hurg. Bad movie. That I watch every time I come across it. (Earlier this football season I actually ended up watching Armageddon instead of a Bills game, and I suspect those who have paid any attention to the Bills this season won’t hold that decision against me.)

B is for Beaches. Treacly garbage that I hated. I saw it in college when they had a screening on campus; everybody told me I’d cry because it was such a tearjerker, but instead, I sat there glowering at the screen because the movie had these two women basically treating each other like crap for two hours. Ugh. (And I could live my whole life without ever hearing “Wind Beneath My Wings” again.)

C is for The Cat from Outer Space. This was one of those live-action Disney movies in the 1970s, the ones that always either starred Dean Jones or Ken Berry. This one had Ken Berry, and I saw it when I was in kindergarten or first grade, and it was complete crap. No need to hash out why; just look at that title.

D is for Dead Poets Society. I’ve said my piece on this movie here. Didn’t like it.

E is for Earthbound. This too came out when I was a kid. An alien family crashlands their ship on Earth and evades the government while taking refuge with a geezer (played by Burl Ives) and his grandson or nephew or something like that. I remember liking it as a kid, but it was probably crap.

F is for Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. The one part of the movie I like is the destruction of the Corvette. Other than that, I find this movie really dull and not terribly funny. This could be due to my generic dislike for Matthew Broderick.

G is for Gymkata. OK, I haven’t seen the entire thing. But I have seen the last half hour, which astonished me in its sheer awfulness. Near as I could tell, some dude with Mad Gymnastics Skillz managed to beat off an entire town’s worth of attackers by using his Mad Gymnastics Skillz, at one point even finding a pommel horse in the middle of the town square. Ummm…sure.

H is for Highlander. I’ve never understood the cult fascination this movie holds for some people. The premise is goofy, and not in the “fun goofy” kind of way either; the acting is dreadful (except for Clancy Brown), with not even Sean Connery avoiding lines like “Are the stars pinpricks in the curtain of night?”; a bunch of guys fighting over a prize that’s never revealed until they whole thing is over so we don’t even know why we should care. Despite the presence of Connery and Clancy Brown, I still manage to dislike this movie.

I is for Independence Day. It’s fun to watch, but there’s just not a single plot point in this movie that makes any sense at all. Most famously there’s Jeff Goldblum disabling the entire alien computer system with a virus he threw together on his 1995 Apple Powerbook, but this movie also has Area 51 having been a secret for fifty years but also being spotted by Will Smith when he flies over it in his fighter jet whilst in combat; it has a Senior Aide to the President of the United States who keeps her cell phone number listed in the local Washington DC phone book “for emergencies” (huh?!); it has the President being a fighter pilot whose Mad Fighter Piloting Skillz are still good enough that he can outfly aliens in space fighters; et cetera.

J is for Jaws IV: The Revenge. Jaws II isn’t that bad a movie, really. III is downright bad. But IV is legendary for its awfulness, including the end where the shark stands on end while a boat runs it through. Ouch.

K is for The Karate Kid Part III. The first Karate Kid movie is fantastic. Seriously, it’s a very, very good movie. The second one isn’t bad either, although it is obviously nowhere near the same league as the original. But the third? Oy. It’s just a disaster. More wisdom from Mr. Miyagi, more troubles for Daniel-san, and another fight at the end where it turns out that Daniel-san’s karate is better than the other guy’s. Why did they make this movie? I have no clue. (And while Ralph Macchio could pull off the sixteen year old kid in the first movie fine, and the seventeen year old kid a little less fine in the second one, here he looks like a thirty-year-old playing a seventeen year old.)

L is for The Lost World: Jurassic Park. What a terrible sequel this is; I can’t believe Steven Spielberg went from Schindler’s List to this. It’s full of one implausible sequence after another, it kills off Richard Schiff, it has a thirteen girl fending off velociraptors by using her Mad Gymnastics Skillz, and so on. The last half hour is better because of the “T-rex on the loose in San Diego” stuff, but this movie is bad.

M is for Mission to Mars. This is one of the worst SF movies I’ve ever seen. It’s boring, it tries to have it both ways with 2001-like hard SF combined with some “Face on Mars” mystical nonsense, and its score (by Ennio Morricone) is downright unpleasant.

N is for Nell. It’s just physically impossible to take this movie seriously. I’m sorry. It’s a neat idea for a story, but as filmed, I always wondered how many takes it took certain scenes to be filmed due to actors breaking out in laughter at the stuff the script had them saying. (I wrote this post a while back and have been sitting on it; since then I learn that it’s one of Belladonna’s favorites. Oh, forgive me! I really wanted to like this one; it’s got a killer cast, for one thing, and it has some great ideas behind it. But about the fourth or fifth time somebody said “Taaayyyinnn innn daa weennnnnddd”, or whatever it was Nell said over and over and over again, I just mentally checked out of the movie.)

O is for Ordinary People. I had to watch this in school, my sophomore year. Other classes were reading Mark Twain, while we were reading Judith Guest and watching this movie, which had the effect, ironically enough, of making me want to do myself in. Luckily, I got better. It took three consecutive viewings of Star Wars the weekend after we finished this one to get it out of my system. (By the way, I know I’ve griped over this before, but one of the great educational travesties of my youth is that my English teacher that year made us read Ordinary People while the other English classes were reading Mark Twain. Heckuva job there, Mrs. Whatever-Your-Name-Was.)

P is for Predator II. I enjoyed the first Predator movie; it was an effective “monster on the loose” kind of movie, good for watching with a couple of friends and some beers on a night in college. Not so the second movie, which was little more than an excuse to use the same monster again. Bad.

Q is for Quest for Camelot. Someday an indisputably good movie will be made from the Arthurian legends. (Excalibur is pretty close, but its pacing is too sluggish and its use of Wagner and Orff in the soundtrack too distracting.) Until then, we’ll have to live with all of the bad movies about Arthur and Camelot that have been made, and there have been a ton of ’em. Here’s one, an animated piece of crud. Not recommended.

R is for Rambo: First Blood Part II. Or any of the Rambo movies, for that matter. (Maybe not First Blood, which I haven’t seen and I’ve heard the best things about.) Rambo was embarrassing macho crap for the macho-men of the 1980s. Jerry Goldsmith wrote some good music for these flicks, but other than that, they’re crap.

S is for Scream. What terrible dreck this movie is. There’s nothing plausible about it, and it’s a terribly confused movie, too: what is it? Spoof? Horror flick whose main notion is that other horror flicks should be taken seriously? It’s just a stupid, stupid movie, filled with dumb characters who behave in ways no ordinary person would behave. And it had two sequels. Yuck.

T is for Thank God It’s Friday. It’s a shame this movie isn’t better known, because it truly deserves the reputation that seems to have accrued around Saturday Night Fever instead. Whereas that film is a dark and cynical film about the lives of young adults who hang out in a disco, TGiF actually is the campy, goofy movie about the lovelorn adults who hang out in a disco. It does have a saving grace in a nice performance by Donna Summer, who sings my beloved “Last Dance” toward the end of the flick. Other than that, though, it’s a bad movie.

U is for The Usual Suspects. Who is Keyser Soze? Who gives a crap? Instead of a gripping movie about the criminals trying to execute a heist bigger than any of them, we get a lame mystery that I found interesting for all of thirty seconds, because that’s how long it took me to figure out who Keyser Soze was. I genuinely can’t understand why so many people think this movie is a classic.

V is for A View to a Kill. I feel a bit unfair here, because I genuinely can’t claim to dislike this movie, even if I grant that Roger Moore was too old by this time to be convincing and that Tonya Roberts was less than good in a part that was also written less than well. But Christopher Walken as a Bond villain? He was terrific! I can’t bring myself to hate this movie. But there’s quite a lot wrong with it, I’ll grant you that.

W is for Waterworld. I actually think this movie wasn’t as bad as its reputation at the time made it out to be, but it’s not that good, either. For one thing, it’s pretty dull most of the way, and you’d think a set that cost something like $100000000 to build would look a bit better than a giant rusting hulk. And while I’m glad there was an SF film that gave a bit of thought to certain survival issues in an environment such as the movie depicts, did the opening scene really have to feature Kevin Costner urinating? Talk about setting an unfortunate tone.

X is for Xanadu. Just because I can’t even think of any bad movies that start with X other than Xanadu. Luckily, Xanadu is truly awful.

Y is for Yes Giorgio. It’s a romantic comedy starring Luciano Pavarotti as a tenor with confidence issues, and the female psychologist who has to help him regain his mojo so he’ll sing at some big concert, or something. It’s wildly bad.

Z is for Zen Monkeys in Love. OK, that’s not a movie that exists, so far as I know. But I drew a complete blank on movies starting with ‘Z’ that I hated, and not even some extensive Googling turned up anything (though Zardoz looks pretty bad, though I’ve not seen it). So, if anyone can jog my memory as to a ‘Z’ movie I’m missing, let me know. I’m sure there are some, out there somewhere. (We watched Zathura a couple of weeks back because The Kid picked it out at the library, but it doesn’t come close to being bad enough to merit inclusion on this list. It’s more of a “Meh” movie.)

Why, oh why, did I watch all these? WHY???!!!

Share This Post

Do not adjust your monitors….

Eagle-eyed readers may notice that the layout has changed a bit around here. I think that Earthlink has reduced the data transfer allowance for people using their bare-bones, free webspace that comes with basic membership, because I’ve been using up my allowed bandwidth in about ten or eleven days since I’ve returned to blogging, which is odd because my traffic is still roughly two-thirds of what it once was (and my traffic was never high to begin with), and I used to get through an entire month with no problem. I’ve reduced the use of images as backgrounds on the blog in favor of solid colors, which I hope helps the problem along.

I’ve also made a couple of other changes, such as my use of a new picture of the American flag for the sidebar. (I’d link the site where I got that flag picture for credit, but the site I got it from no longer exists; the pic comes up on Google’s image search, but the site is an expired domain name default page. Oh well.) Finally, I ditched the Technorati widget that was attached to each post. It allowed, supposedly, the viewing of posts on other blogs linking to the individual posts here, but [a] I don’t get many links, [b] I never used that tool anyway, and finally, [c] if Technorati was working slowly — which seems to usually be the case with them — the whole blog seemed to load glacially. I made the change a while back to switch the columns so the content would at least appear first if the sidebar was taking forever, but the last few days, that Technorati widget has been causing the sidebar itself to take forever to appear. So out it goes.

Enjoy! Or not.

(BTW, not that anyone cares, but I’ve stopped using BlogLines entirely for following those blogs I follow via RSS, in favor of Google Reader. For one thing, on Google Reader, posts that you’ve read don’t disappear entirely, so I can go back an re-read them for a time.)

Share This Post

Boldly Geeking

I wanted to highlight a few nice geek-posts I’ve seen the last week:

:: First, Jason takes note of some possible reason for optimism regarding the Star Trek relaunch by JJ Abrams:

So, here we’ve got a good look at the unfortunate vessel that’s only glimpsed in fast cuts and in between explosions during The Trailer. It’s instantly recognizable as a Federation starship with its saucer-shaped primary hull and the blue-glowing deflector dish. But wait, you might be saying if you’re familiar with the usual Star Trek vehicle architecture, there’s something screwy here: the secondary hull (that’s the bit that sports the deflector dish and the shuttlecraft hanger in the back) is on top of the ship, not below as on pretty much every other Starfleet vessel ever seen in a Star Trek TV series or movie. And there’s only one engine nacelle? Has J.J. Abrams gone insane? Is this the sign we’ve all been looking for, the proof that he’s abandoned all the established Trek lore and is waving his private parts at the existing fanbase? (Can you tell I’ve been hanging out on the fanboy message boards again?)

Well, no… in fact, I take the Kelvin‘s layout as a very positive sign of exactly the opposite. But you’ve probably got to be a real old-timer like me to recognize the clues. You see, the Kelvin is highly reminiscent of the very earliest design sketches for the good old Enterprise herself, which were upside-down relative to the way we’re familiar with her looking. You can see one of these sketches on this page (scroll down to the section labeled “Artwork”), and several more in the old book The Making of Star Trek, if you can track down a copy of that. I think they were reprinted in the excellent book Inside Star Trek, as well (for my money, that one is the best volume ever written on the history of the original series).

As for the single-engine controversy, it’s more-or-less understood nowadays that in the Trek ‘verse, you need to have two nacelles, but that wasn’t always the case. Way back in the ’70s, even before Star Trek: The Motion Picture — the Golden Age of original series fandom, in my opinion — one of the primary sources for young nerds was a book called The Star Fleet Technical Manual by Franz Joseph. This volume was considered official “canon” for years until Gene Roddenberry decided it wasn’t, and as I recall, it contained several one-nacelle ship designs.

Ah, the Star Fleet Technical Manual…I really should track down a copy of that book one of these years. It was a lot of fun to dig through, back when I was a kid. I never owned it, but one of the libraries we used to frequent had a copy in its collection. I remember looking at the lists of all the ships in Starfleet, and also noting the interesting designs of the ships as well. Sometimes the warp nacelles were on top of the ship, sometimes underneath; some ships had only one nacelle with no secondary hull, and so on. The USS Reliant from The Wrath of Khan was a nice throwback to these other formulations of Starfleet ships, and Jason’s right to note that at least in this aspect of his visual design, Abrams is taking his cues from established Trek history.

Of course, this was never in much doubt. Abrams has always been good at injecting his projects with lots of small details for the segments of fandom that live for the small stuff. Witness all the people who devote time to digging through the inner details of LOST, and similar factors were at play in Alias. I’m not worried about that aspect of this project; I remain worried that Abrams is going to screw up the character dynamic of Trek.

Second, SamuraiFrog decides that he’s a Star Wars fan after all:

Recently, Becca and I sat in front of our new, big widescreen TV and watched, in a single day, all six Star Wars films, from The Phantom Menace to Return of the Jedi. And it turns out I’m still a Star Wars fan. It was hard to be one for the last decade plus of humorless Star Wars fandom whining its overly entitled little head off about the thing it professes to love but openly hates (and, like an abused housewife, keeps returning to because no one understands it in that special way that they do). But I still dig it, and watching all six parts at once makes for a more unified experience than I thought it would. It all makes sense, and it all holds together. And it’s surprisingly easy to get emotionally involved.

I still haven’t watched the complete Star Wars saga in one go, although a few times in college we watched all three of the Original Trilogy at once. My constant hope that the backlash against Star Wars eventually fades continues to hold sway in my mind.

Share This Post

Christmas Quiz!

This quiz comes from Roger:

1. Wrapping paper or gift bags?

I always aspire to using wrapping paper, but end up using bags for most gifts.

2. Real tree or artificial?

We used to get a real tree every year, but now we use a fake one. It really is easier, even if every year our tree ends up looking like last year’s tree.

3. When do you put up the tree?

When we say, “Wow, we gotta get the tree up, because Christmas is in X days!” I never get the people who have their trees already up on Thanksgiving.

4. When do you take the tree down?

Sometime in mid-January. Like I don’t get the people who have the tree up on Thanksgiving, I also don’t get the impulse to take it all down in December 26. Why the rush?

5. Do you like eggnog?

I tasted some last week that rocked my world, so I’ll probably get some and mix it with rum. It’s an unpleasant sounding name, though. Remember that episode of Star Trek TNG where Ryker is eating a bunch of Klingon dishes, and they all have names like “GAAGGHHH”? That’s what “eggnog” sounds like to me.

6. Favorite gifts received as a child?

Huh. I’m not sure I can pick just one. Every year had its distinct gifts, its bits of magic that made my life great at that time. Sure, interests moved on and last year’s toys would eventually fade, but I can honestly say that everything I received, with no exceptions that I can recall, was great whenever I received it. My parents, sister, and extended family were always really good at the Christmas gift thing.

Now, some toys I got do stand out in my memory. The first thing I saw when coming from my room to the tree in the living room in my kindergarten year was the stuffed Curious George I’d so desperately wanted. The next year there was, among others, a battery-driven dump-truck thing that was really cool; it moved on this little track and would dump its cargo and then turn around, all on its own, and go pick it up. Second grade’s big gift was a starter model railroad set by Marklin (which is, I’m told, one of the finest model railroad manufacturers). Third and fourth grade are kind of fuzzy in my head for some reason, but at one of them I finally got my own record player which meant I no longer had to go to my parents’ room to listen to my own records. (It also had an 8-track deck, huzzah!) And fifth grade was the year the VIC-20 arrived. Various years after that saw cool computer games, treasured books and records, and other wonderful items turn up under the tree. Ninth grade may have been when my parents bought me the kayak (now there’s a pasttime I need to take up again), and a few years later, my E-flat trumpet.

I never had a bad Christmas as a kid.

7. Hardest person to buy for?

The Daughter, if only because I know I can’t always get her all that she wants. It’s the reality, but still, I hate that.

8. Easiest person to buy for?

The Daughter, because she’s never yet complained about that one gift she didn’t get. (That day is probably coming, though. I know I did it once, and then after the dirty look I got from my mother, never again.)

9. Do you have a nativity scene?

Yes. It’s fairly beat-up by this point, and maybe we should look into a new one. We also have a set of glass Christmas ornaments that depict the people of the Nativity: Mary, Joseph, the Magi, and that baby who was there too. (These are pictured here.)

10. Mail or email Christmas cards?

Both, although I tend to be bad at getting the physical ones in the mail, so I end up giving physical ones personally to the people I know who are here.

11. Worst Christmas gift you ever received?

Ah, geez…I hate ragging on Christmas presents. It was probably something I got not from a family member, but at the annual Christmas exchange with the other kids at school.

12. Favorite Christmas Movie?

This year I resolve to finally watch A Christmas Story, which I’ve never seen. I honestly don’t know how it’s managed to completely slip through my cracks except for the fact that we don’t have cable and thus are never able to partake of whatever channel it is that runs the movie for twenty-four hours straight every year.

That said, I know it’s not everybody’s idea of a “Christmas movie”, but to me it is: Love, Actually, which takes place at Christmas and is shot in such a way that at many points in its running time the movie actually sparkles. I also love to watch My Fair Lady at Christmastime, although that’s not specifically a Christmas movie; I merely associate it with the season because that’s when I first watched it. I also associate The Sound of Music with the season, but that’s probably because it’s an ideal family film and family time’s always a priority this time of year.

(I don’t much like It’s a Wonderful Life, by the way.

13. When do you start shopping for Christmas?

When I start thinking about it, really. I used to begin very early, in September even, but now I tend to be a November and December shopper. I do tend to end up shopping the last few days before Christmas, but that’s not because I’m being the typical lackadaisical male, but rather because the way my paychecks run, I have to spread my shopping out thusly.

14. Have you ever recycled a Christmas present?

Unless donating something I received years ago to Goodwill or the donation bins at church counts, no. Although one year I did give a bottle of liquor I received for Christmas to a guy who helped us move, because he was quite the drinker and because the bottle was something I didn’t really care for. (Kahlua, maybe.)

15. Favorite thing to eat at Christmas?

Candy cane ice cream, mint flavored anything, Christmas sugar cookies, caramel corn, et cetera. Oh, and those chocolates with liquor in them. Those make the day a lot of fun.

16. Lights on the tree?

I prefer white, but the artificial one we have now has colored lights pre-installed. We always add a strand of white lights, though. Mono-colored trees are always nice for a change, though, especially for smaller, “auxiliary” trees; on these, I like blue lights.

17. Favorite Christmas song?

I’m pretty sure I did a post on Christmas music once, in years past…let’s see, oh yes, here it is, which turns out to be…another version of this very quiz. Harumph…anyway, I do love “Little Drummer Boy”. (And I really don’t like “Carol of the Bells”. It just doesn’t ring my…well, you get it.)

18. Travel at Christmas or stay home?

We always stay home, although travel someday might be fun.

19. Can you name all of Santa’s reindeer?

Sure.

20. Angel on the tree top or a star?

The severed heads of my foes.

OK, fine, not really. An angel.

21. Open the presents Christmas Eve or morning?

Christmas Eve. We find that Christmas morning is a lot less hectic that way; the entire day becomes more relaxing and festive.

One year, when I was a teenager and my sister was home either from college or grad school, we opened the gifts on Christmas Eve, after she’d had a bit too much to drink, and thus the next morning she pretty much got to open everything again: “Oh, wow, did I get this? From who? Wow!!”

22. Most annoying thing about this time of the year?

All that “War on Christmas” crap I have to listen to. Look, folks, the fact is that the days are long gone when you can simply assume that everybody you’re talking to is a Christian. Maybe you think that stinks, but you really need to get over it.

I also tire of people who can’t seem to find the way to have fun, even with the shopping. Sure, there are lots of people around and it’s crowded and it takes a while to get through the registers at Target. That’s the baseline for this time of year, and you should factor that in as the cost of doing business and move on. I had a good time shopping on Black Friday afternoon this year, but I was really disheartened to hear people yelling at their kids in the middle of the stores after what had obviously been long days on their feet already.

23. Favorite ornament theme or color?

No color, actually, but I do love the painted glass ornaments, and I buy new ones every year, to the point where the tree is probably too “busy”.

24. Favorite for Christmas dinner?

I don’t really have a favorite. Sometimes we have turkey, sometimes we have ham. And one year, when The Wife was sick, I made pastitsio.

25. What do you want for Christmas this year?

Books, time to write, music, good food, wine, a new winter coat, more know-how on maintenance jobs, less girth (still holding steady, but watch out, January!), world peace, January 20 to come as quickly as possible, an end to recession, and good will toward men. And pie. Gotta have pie.

26. Who is most likely to respond to this?

Anyone who looks at these quizzes and thinks, “Hey, I gotta post me some of that!”

Share This Post

Et tu….

Via Jason, I learn who I would be if I was an action hero (sorry about the formatting, but it’s one of those things where you copy-and-paste the HTML code they give you, and I don’t feel like fixing it manually):

You Scored as Maximus

After his family was murdered by the evil emperor Commodus, the great Roman general Maximus went into hiding to avoid Commodus’s assassins. He became a gladiator, hoping to dominate the colosseum in order to one day get the chance of killing Commodus. Maximus is valiant, courageous, and dedicated. He wants nothing more than the chance to avenge his family, but his temper often gets the better of him.

Maximus

79%

The Amazing Spider-Man

75%

Indiana Jones

67%

Lara Croft

63%

Neo, the “One”

63%

Batman, the Dark Knight

63%

William Wallace

58%

Captain Jack Sparrow

58%

James Bond, Agent 007

54%

The Terminator

54%

El Zorro

50%

Huh. I wouldn’t have guessed him, but OK, I guess.

Share This Post

Remember the Knights? We don’t!

Hey, my alma-mater got a mention today in Gregg Easterbrook’s Tuesday Morning Quarterback column, under his “Obscure College Score” item:

Double Bonus Obscure College Score: Wisconsin-Whitewater 34, Wartburg 17 (Division III playoffs). [Yay Wartburg! -Ed.] Located in Waverly, Iowa, Wartburg offers a course about the TV series “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” The course description reports, “Buffy the Vampire Slayer has become a focus of cultural and feminist studies … showings of the series are a course requirement.” (Go here, then look under the Department of Inquiry Studies for course 101 04.)

I’m not sure if he’s sneering at Wartburg there or not, but lots of colleges offer courses devoted to various teevee programs, and Buffy is generally fairly highly regarded, so I’m not sure what Easterbrook’s point here is. He doesn’t really clarify; he just tosses this out there. Maybe he’s arguing that coursework on Buffy is why Wartburg isn’t the most famous of schools? That seems odd, too…there are thousands of colleges in the United States, how can they all be well-noted?

Easterbrook also cuts out a bit of the course description, where those ellipses are. Here’s what’s missing:

This section will use the series [1997-2003] to discuss issues such as coming of age, education feminism, morality, destiny, Good vs. Evil, sexuality, friendship, leadership, language and other topics. Students are expected to spend some time familiarizing themselves with the series outside of class and practice becoming critical viewers.

Not sure I see anything wrong with this, then. Plus, when you look at the entire offering of the “Department of Inquiry Studies”, a whole slew of courses turns up. There was no such department when I was there (1989-1993), so this is a fairly new thing, I suppose. It looks interdisciplinary in nature, though.

Anyway, go Knights! And boo, the Wisconsin-Whitewater…uh…Whatevers!

Share This Post

ForgottenStars.net

The official site of Kelly Sedinger: Reader, writer, photographer, and dreamer

Skip to content ↓