I remember OKC painfully well. Part of the East Wing destruction counternarrative is that 1) there have always been changes (true, but there was a process), 2) the WH was built in part with slave labor so who cares (Partially true, though the East Wing was built in 1902), and 3) it’s being built with “private donations” (at least part of it from various FOTUS extortion schemes). Did he lie in July when he said the East Wing wouldn’t be touched or is he so mercurial that he changed what’s left of his mind?
Comments are closed.
Discover more from ForgottenStars.net
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
I remember OKC painfully well. Part of the East Wing destruction counternarrative is that 1) there have always been changes (true, but there was a process), 2) the WH was built in part with slave labor so who cares (Partially true, though the East Wing was built in 1902), and 3) it’s being built with “private donations” (at least part of it from various FOTUS extortion schemes). Did he lie in July when he said the East Wing wouldn’t be touched or is he so mercurial that he changed what’s left of his mind?