Tone Poem Tuesday

I got nothin’, folks. Today was complete shit. Here, as is my practice in such situations, is Franz von Suppe.

Our conductor here (leading the Vienna Philharmonic in their 1990 (!) New Year’s Day Concert) is Zubin Mehta, who just celebrated his 86th birthday the other day. Mehta, by the way, was a Kennedy Center Honoree in 2006, along with Smokey Robinson, Steven Spielberg, Andrew Lloyd Webber, and Dolly Parton. What a night that was!

(If you’re wondering, an emergency hot water heater replacement, news that a guy I knew in high school died (I didn’t know him very well, but well enough to know that he was a nice guy), and, yes, the Supreme Court thing.)

 

Posted in music | Tagged | Comments Off on Tone Poem Tuesday

And now, Ms. Andrews helps to turn the page on your calendar.

 

Posted in music | Tagged | 1 Comment

National Poetry Month, conclusion: How to build your poetry collection

So you want to read some poetry!

As we have wound up National Poetry Month 2022, as a final summation I earlier reposted an older post about why it’s important for writers specifically to read poetry (besides the simple fact that poetry is art and it should be enjoyed on that basis alone). Now, I offer up some thoughts on how to start building your poetry section of your personal library. (There is an earlier post in the archives along these same lines, but I looked at it and decided it warranted rewriting.)

Like any subject, it can be daunting to approach buying poetry books if you’ve no idea what’s good and what’s not. My belief is that it’s best to start with a small collection of general poetry volumes, and then branch out into more specific areas as your poetic tastes start to make themselves known. You don’t want to fill your library with single-author collections at first; there’s time for that later on.

The really good thing about exploring poetry, though, is that since poetry has been around since we started chiseling words into rock and painting pictures on cavern walls, so too have books of poetry–so this is where your used bookstores and your library’s used book fundraiser sales can be huge. For not a whole lot of money you can stock a pretty nice little starter library of poetry! For an area of literature that is supposedly so intimidating, poetry is actually very easy to find.

Here’s a small tour of some of my poetry library. This is not exhaustive, but these books are representative of my approach.

Two copies of a very fine collection you might want to start with! It’s two different editions, separated by over fifty years, so while there is a great deal of overlap, there is sufficient difference between the two to warrant both being in my library. The later edition (right) obviously has more recent poetry, but to make room, some older work has been dropped from the earlier edition (left). The old edition was a library discard that I’ve owned for forever. There’s nothing the least bit wrong with it, so in my library it lives, and I turn to it often.

(Now, by “English” verse they’re referring to specifically English poets, not all poets who wrote in English, so there’s a companion Oxford Book of American Poetry. Which I also own!)

Sticking with collections, there is this favorite of mine:

Poetry isn’t just an English-language thing, or a Western world thing, so having a collection or two of verse going beyond the confines of English is a good idea. If you’re multi-lingual, great! You can get collections in whatever languages you have sufficient fluency to read. For me, I have to rely on translation. (This particular volume was expensive, and I bought it new, but in terms of return on investment, it’s long-since earned its keep. I do have another, older volume of world poetry that I acquired at a library sale.)

Once you start to home in on specific poets, collections of their work will become valuable. I don’t go nuts with these, but I can’t lay off a pretty Tennyson collection. I own several. The first here was a gift from The Daughter, and a lovely volume it is!

That cover is stunning, by the way; hi-res image here.

Another Tennyson collection:

One caveat about older poetry volumes like this, which turn up at library book sales: these were often used as school books a hundred years ago, so they will often have signatures inside, along with underlining and marginalia from students of many decades ago. If you’re building your own poetry reference library, this shouldn’t be a deal-breaker. (If you’re approaching this as a book collector, then have care. Nothing wrong with being a book collector! That’s just not my approach. My library is a working library.)

And then there are themed collections! Often worth owning not only for their focus, but for the commentary of the anthologists.

I should make honorable mention of this, the poetry book I’ve owned the longest. I bought this at my college bookstore in my freshman year. It’s still in good shape.

For reference volumes of American poetry, you can’t do better than the Library of America. You can join the LoA as a subscription service (they’ll mail you a book from their extensive catalog every six weeks or so, and you get to pick the ones you want), or you can search out the individual volumes on their own. Not a cheap way to go, unless they turn up at the library or a used bookstore, but these are very high-quality volumes. (LoA volumes do not provide any commentary on the works they contain, so bear that in mind.)

As you search for poetry books, you’ll come across volumes that you want not just because they contain wonderful poetry, but because they are interesting and lovely objects in themselves. This copy of the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám is one that I found in an antique mall one time. (Some antique malls will have booksellers amongst their vendors. Some do not. Your mileage will vary!)

Isn’t that gorgeous? Poetry really lends itself to beautiful book-making.

Here are two unique items in miniature. I should have included a 3×5 index card for scale, but the Browning book is about 3×4 inches and is less than 1/4in thick.

From the book on the left:

(Hi-res here)

Finally, you might want to have some nonfiction books about poetry in your library. Sometimes you need some background, whether it’s “What are the formal expectations in a sonnet?” or “What were the prime events in Byron’s life and how does his work fit into the poetical canon?” Books like these are good for that. (The one on the left is somewhat intimidating the first time you see it. You don’t have to read it cover-to-cover! I haven’t. I keep meaning to, but…yeah.)

As noted, this is hardly exhaustive. I could write about some collections that Garrison Keillor edited in his long years of hosting short poetry items on National Public Radio, or themed collections like my collection of Holocaust poetry or the one collecting poems about music. Or collections I own by classic poets or modern ones (poetry is very much a going concern, especially on the Internet!). I could write a lengthy post just summing up my Shakespeare collection. I haven’t had great luck with collections with titles like Poems to Inspire Americans or Happy Poems for Rainy Days (not real titles, but reflective of real titles), which in my experience tend to contain schmaltzy poetry of the type that most often resides inside Hallmark cards, but again–your mileage may vary! It’s your library. Curate it to your needs and your tastes!

And now, on to May.

Posted in On Books, poetry | Tagged , | Comments Off on National Poetry Month, conclusion: How to build your poetry collection

National Poetry Month: Why Writers Should Read Poetry, part I

Reposting now that National Poetry Month is over, as a reminder to make poetry a part of your regular literary life, writers!

Robert Frost
Image via writingforward.com

The Death of the Ball Turret Gunner

From my mother’s sleep I fell into the State,
And I hunched in its belly till my wet fur froze.
Six miles from earth, loosed from its dream of life,
I woke to black flak and the nightmare fighters.
When I died they washed me out of the turret with a hose.

–Randall Jarrell (1914-1965)

When the Lion at his pleasure comes
To the watering place to drink, ah see!
See the lesser beasts of Al-Rassan
Scatter, like blown leaves in autumn,
Like air-borne seedlings in the spring,
Like grey clouds that part to let the first star
Of the god shine down upon the earth.

–Guy Gavriel Kay, from The Lions of Al-Rassan

April is National Poetry Month, so I’ll be doing some posting about poetry over the next few weeks, starting with this. Should writers read poetry? Should they write it? While I would never presume to tell writers what they should or should not write, I tend to think that the answers to both questions are Yes.

I have occasionally committed acts of poetry myself, but not very often, and as I don’t generally find the results particularly encouraging, I don’t intend to share them except as very brief excerpts in my fiction. I do, however, read a decent amount of poetry, and I firmly believe that all writers should do so.

It all comes down to what Stephen King called “the writer’s toolbox,” and his dictum that to be a good writer one must read a lot and write a lot. Reading a lot extends a writer’s grasp, and reading poetry extends it in ways that reading a lot of fiction does not. If writing is likened to carpentry–extending Mr. King’s metaphor a bit–than reading poetry is like learning entirely new methods and techniques. A new way to stain a piece of wood, say, or perhaps a new method of joinery.

While poetry can certainly be read for its technical aspects, I find myself concentrating much less these days on things like rhyme or meter than I did when I was reading poetry in school. What I’m after now is the language itself. I read poetry to see, in new ways, just what language can really do.

Consider metaphor. Here’s a poem called “Up-Hill”, by Christina Rosetti:

Does the road wind up-hill all the way?
Yes, to the very end.
Will the day’s journey take the whole long day?
From morn to night, my friend.

But is there for the night a resting-place?
A roof for when the slow dark hours begin.
May not the darkness hide it from my face?
You cannot miss that inn.

Shall I meet other wayfarers at night?
Those who have gone before.
Then must I knock, or call when just in sight?
They will not keep you standing at that door.

Shall I find comfort, travel-sore and weak?
Of labour you shall find the sum.
Will there be beds for me and all who seek?
Yea, beds for all who come.

I suppose the metaphor here is pretty obvious: the road that is being walked here is life itself, and the inn at the end that cannot be missed and has beds for all who come is death. That’s not especially hard to see. But the craft of the metaphor is what’s interesting here, and in my experience, metaphor is best explored via an industrious reading of the poets.

Then there is description. Writers often worry about description: what’s too much, what’s too little, which details are best to utilize in painting a word-picture, which details are best left aside. As much as I love the work of JRR Tolkien, Alexandre Dumas, and Victor Hugo, the fact is that writers these days are not given as much space to craft their descriptions as in decades or centuries past, so we have to be careful.

This is where reading poetry can help us. Take this short verse by Tran Nhan-tong, a Vietnamese emperor and poet who lived from 1258 to 1308:

The willows trail such glory that the birds are struck dumb.
Evening clouds balance above the eave-shaded hall.
A friend comes, not for conversation,
But to lean on the balustrade and watch the turquoise sky.

(translated by Nguyen Ngoc Bich, in the collection World Poetry)

So few details! In fact, there are almost no details given here, just statements of fact. But can anyone read this and not create a mental picture of a summer evening, looking out at the willows beneath a turquoise sky dotted with clouds? If they can, I don’t know how.

And then there is rhyme and meter and alliteration and all the other various things that our high school English teachers tried teaching us. Those are all wonderful tools that you can use in your storytelling. For all our focus on things like plot, character, and world building, ultimately the spell that our stories cast is deeply dependent on how we use our language. That’s where so much of the real magic lies, and this is best learned by reading poetry with an eye to what the language is doing.

Next up: Where to start?

Posted in poetry, Writing | Comments Off on National Poetry Month: Why Writers Should Read Poetry, part I

First Spring adventure

Last Sunday, Cane (the Dee-oh-gee) and I went out for a Sunday walk in the park for the first time since December. Why no outings since then? Well, we got back from Oahu just in time for the weather to shift into a much colder and snowier pattern; where the WNY winter until the end of December had been very mild, it pivoted hard in January to being snowy enough and cold enough for Buffalo to take this year’s title as Snowiest City In America. Oof. Plus, there’s the fact that Cane isn’t a spring chicken anymore. He’s 9-and-a-half as I write this, and while he’s still got tons of spunk and energy, he’s not as springy as he once was, so I have to be a bit careful about our adventures. I can’t just throw his leash on him and go for a four-hour hike someplace.

But still…he was thrilled to get out!

[Insert Morgan Freeman delivering monologue about hope]

Someone peed here.

Posing him for the camera remains a challenge.

We went to Knox Farm State Park, a favorite haunt of ours in East Aurora. Even though we’re over a month into spring, in this part of the country we’re only just now starting to see the first hints of spring’s awakening. We’re getting there, though. Today is May 1. It can only get greener from here. (I’ll spare you my usual rant about Spring being WNY’s worst season.)

And if you’re wondering why Carla rarely gets featured in these walks, it’s mainly because she really doesn’t like riding in the car, for reasons we’ve never been able to figure. That sucks! She loves being in new places and being outside, but she is so miserable in the car that we always feel terrible about that part of things.

She is enjoying the greening of our yard, though. Witness:

Elmer Fudd can have “Wabbit Season” and “Duck Season”. Carla is all about “Mud Season”!

As I’m writing this it’s a sunny Sunday morning, but there’s rain in the forecast in the next couple of hours. Sigh….

 

Posted in On Buffalo and The 716, On Dogs and Dog Life, Photographic Documentation | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on First Spring adventure

National Poetry Month, day 30: Wrapping up with light verse

‘Tis the final day of National Poetry Month for 2022! I always enjoy Poetry Month a great deal and come out of it resolving to read more poetry throughout the year, and even though I do read quite a bit of it, somehow I always feel that it’s not enough. I do plan to post more about poetry, moving forward. Maybe I’ll even make poetry a regular feature in the newsletter I’m planning to launch this summer. [makes note about that] [also makes note to write about the newsletter I’m planning to launch this summer]

We’ll close out the month with a bit of a lightening of the mood. But first, a shot is needed across the bow of the continually dark-and-grim tone in our collective approach to Art. I’ve written about these matters before and will doubtless do so again, but here now is a non-poetic excerpt from the collection The Norton Book of Light Verse, by the book’s editor, Russell Baker:

The point of all this is that light verse really needs no introduction because we have known it from the cradle and should be at ease with it. Most of us, indeed, probably are at ease with it and can even recite a limerick or two from memory. What is easily enjoyed, however, must often defend itself against charges of low aspirations.

The very term “light verse” suggests inferiority, for in the Anglo-Saxon world at least, lightness is considered contemptible, except in the female figure. Such terms as “light-hearted”, “lightweight”, and “light entertainment” are little sneers meant to caution us against people and things that are, well, not quite…worthy.

We are dealing with the ancient prejudice against comedy, which is part of the residue of Puritanism, a doctrine defined by H.L. Mencken as the terrible suspicion that somebody somewhere may be having a good time. Thus the term “light verse” is universally accepted, even by poets who should know better, as poetry’s equivalent to the surgeon-general’s warning about cigarettes:

“Caution: These verses may be hazardous to your solemnity.”

You will note that there are no collections of “heavy verse” or of “ponderous verse”, though there is more than enough around to past up a dozen volumes. Nor will you ever see an “Anthology of Serious Verse” or “A Compendium of Solemn Verse”.

The explanation is that the public today expects poetry to be heavy, ponderous, serious, or solemn. Why confirm their worst fears? The public’s position on this, let me hasten to say, is badly outdated. Anticipating that most poetry will be worse than carrying heavy luggage through O’Hare Airport, the public, to its loss, reads very little of it.

I speak here with some humility, because I gave up on new poetry myself thirty years ago when most of it began to read like coded messages passing between lonely aliens in a hostile world. Assembling this collection, though, introduced me to dozens of contemporary poets whose work is full of wonders. Most of them are not much read. That’s a pity because it seems to me that, contrary to popular supposition, this is a good age for poetry in America.

Most of these contemporary poets do not write verse that asks to be classified as “serious” or “light”. When doing their work they obviously find it unnecessary, perhaps impossible, to distinguish between light and heavy. Perhaps this is what makes them feel so in touch; the world we have made here at the end of the twentieth century is simultaneously light and serious, grave and absurd. Our terrible tragedy is also our low comedy, and vice versa.

Some of this new poetry is very serious indeed, yet makes me smile; some of it reads light enough, but turns weighty in the digestive system.

Oh, how I could not possibly agree with that more! I’m always thrilled to find someone stating my position, in more eloquent terms than I can muster, about the American tendency nowadays to consistently value darkness over light in our art. I know people who, when asked to name their favorite books or movies or teevee series, will rattle off a list of very dark and grim works without a single comedy among the lot. Comedy films almost never win Best Picture, and even in genre circles the prejudice stands: ask a Star Wars fan why they think The Empire Strikes Back is the best movie in the saga, I flat-out guarantee that the first words out of their mouth will be something along the lines of “It’s darker….”

Darkness is fine. I like darkness, and I’ve written some of it. In fact, just this week I was struggling with a very dark scene that traumatizes a couple of my characters. But darkness is just a quality that we use once in a while. It’s a tool in the shed, a spice in the cabinet, a color on the palette, whichever metaphor you wish. Our error is to conflate darkness with quality, and that does harm to our art and to ourselves.

And I suppose, given Mr. Baker’s words quoted above, that I should revise my estimations for how recent a phenomenon this is, because The Norton Book of Light Verse came out in 1986. Those words, which apply perfectly well to our popular culture here in 2022, are almost forty years old.

(By the way, I just looked up Mr. Baker, and it turns out he died in 2019, at the age of 93. On the basis of this introduction, I’m suddenly interested in looking up his other work, even moreso after reading him described as “like some fourth century citizen of Rome who is amused and intrigued by the Empire’s collapse but who still cares enough to mock the stupidities that are hastening its end.” Oh, how I relate to that….)

And now, some actual verse. I’m basically thumbing through Mr. Baker’s anthology and choosing poems almost at random. Enjoy!

“Advice”, by Langston Hughes

Folks I’m telling you,
birthing is hard
and dying is mean–
so get yourself
a little loving
in between.

“The Star System”, by Richard Wilbur

When you’re a white-hot youth, emit the rays
Which, now unmarked, shall dazzle future days.
Burn for the joy of it, and waste no juice
On hopes of prompt discovery. Produce!

Then, white with years, live wisely and survive,
Thus you may be on hand when you arrive,
And, like Antares, rosily dilate,
And for a time be gaseous and great.

“New Jersey Turnpike”, by Richard Cumbie

It’s been this way for some time:

  misguided through the middle
  to view the worst of it

  a dime for my waste at the
  Walt Whitman service station

  Howard Johnson’s over light
    (the flavor of America)
  no truckers in sight

I paid graciously to be allowed Delaware.

“From a London Bookshop”, anonymous

Holy Scripture, Write Divine,
Leather bound, at one and nine,
Satan trembles when he sees
Bibles sold as cheap as these.

“Against Broccoli”, by Roy Blount, Jr.

The local groceries are all out of broccoli,
Loccoli.

“Local Note”, by Arthur Guiterman

In Sparkhill buried lies that man of mark
  Who brought the Obelisk to Central Park,
Redoubtable Commander H.H. Gorringe,
  Whose name supplies to long-sought rhyme
  for ‘orange’.

“Inventory”, by Dorothy Parker

Four be the things I am wiser to know:
Idleness, sorrow, a friend, and a foe.

Four be the things I’d be better without:
Love, curiosity, freckles, and doubt.

Three be the things I shall never attain:
Envy, content, and sufficient champagne.

Three be the things I shall have till I die:
Laughter and hope and a sock in the eye.

“On Tomato Ketchup”, anonymous

If you do not shake the bottle,
None’ll come, and then a lot’ll.

“Reflections on Ice-Breaking”, by Ogden Nash

Candy
is dandy
But liquor
is quicker.

“The Fool and the Poet”, by Alexander Pope

Sir, I admit your general rule,
That every poet is a fool,
But you yourself may serve to show it,
That every fool is not a poet.

That’ll do it. Keep reading poetry, folks–your literary world will be better for it!

 

Posted in poetry | Tagged , | 1 Comment

National Poetry Month, day 29: Etheridge Knight

Poet Ethridge Knight. Image from DailyKos.com

Etheridge Knight was a Black poet who lived 1931-1991. His rise to poetic prominence came via a book of poems he wrote while incarcerated for robbery, Poems from Prison. This ended up being a theme in Knight’s work, as he produced another collection called Black Voices from Prison, in which he collected his own works plus works from others. Knight was born April 19, which makes this his birth-month; in nine years we will reach his centennial.

I found Knight’s work via selections in a recent book acquisition, the Library of America’s African American Poetry: 250 Years of Struggle and Song. The work of Knight’s that is featured in that book spotlight hard, almost harsh rhythms in the verse; these are poems that challenge one to speak them aloud and hear the pain inherent in the American Black experience and the fact that for many in that community, the reality is a carceral state that is inherently punitive in ways that white people simply don’t experience.

I sometimes wonder if white people look at people like Etheridge Knight and use their examples to reinforce the wrong conclusions: “See, if you do your time and then work hard, look at what you can accomplish!” and all that sort of thing. We don’t take nearly enough account of having made a world where the feelings that Etheridge Knight, and so many others, end up expressing should be experienced by anyone at all.

Here are two poems by Etheridge Knight.

“Haiku”
1
Eastern guard tower
glints in sunset; convicts rest
like lizards on rocks.

2

The piano man
is stingy, at 3 A.M.
his songs drop like plum.

3
Morning sun slants cell.
Drunks stagger like cripple flies
On jailhouse floor.

4
To write a blues song
is to regiment riots
and pluck gems from graves.

5
A bare pecan tree
slips a pencil shadow down
a moonlit snow slope.

6
The falling snow flakes
Cannot blunt the hard aches nor
Match the steel stillness.

7
Under moon shadows
A tall boy flashes knife and
Slices star bright ice.

8
In the August grass
Struck by the last rays of sun
The cracked teacup screams.

9
Making jazz swing in
Seventeen syllables AIN’T
No square poet’s job.

“The Bones of My Father”
1
There are no dry bones
here in this valley. The skull
of my father grins
at the Mississippi moon
from the bottom
of the Tallahatchie,
the bones of my father
are buried in the mud
of these creeks and brooks that twist
and flow their secrets to the sea.
but the wind sings to me
here the sun speaks to me
of the dry bones of my father.

      2
There are no dry bones
in the northern valleys, in the Harlem alleys
young / black / men with knees bent
nod on the stoops of the tenements
and dream
of the dry bones of my father.

And young white longhairs who flee
their homes, and bend their minds
and sing their songs of brotherhood
and no more wars are searching for
my father’s bones.

      3
There are no dry bones here.
We hide from the sun.
No more do we take the long straight strides.
Our steps have been shaped by the cages
that kept us. We glide sideways
like crabs across the sand.
We perch on green lilies, we search
beneath white rocks…
THERE ARE NO DRY BONES HERE

The skull of my father
grins at the Mississippi moon
from the bottom
of the Tallahatchie.
Posted in poetry | Tagged , | 1 Comment

National Poetry Month, day 28 AND Something for Thursday: “The Highwayman”

Image: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/424816177347725860/

I’m just going to get out of the poem’s way today. Listen to Loreena McKennit’s classic setting afterward!

“The Highwayman”, by Alfred Noyes

PART ONE
The wind was a torrent of darkness among the gusty trees.
The moon was a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas.
The road was a ribbon of moonlight over the purple moor,
And the highwayman came riding—
         Riding—riding—
The highwayman came riding, up to the old inn-door.

He’d a French cocked-hat on his forehead, a bunch of lace at his chin,
A coat of the claret velvet, and breeches of brown doe-skin.
They fitted with never a wrinkle. His boots were up to the thigh.
And he rode with a jewelled twinkle,
         His pistol butts a-twinkle,
His rapier hilt a-twinkle, under the jewelled sky.

Over the cobbles he clattered and clashed in the dark inn-yard.
He tapped with his whip on the shutters, but all was locked and barred.
He whistled a tune to the window, and who should be waiting there
But the landlord’s black-eyed daughter,
         Bess, the landlord’s daughter,
Plaiting a dark red love-knot into her long black hair.

And dark in the dark old inn-yard a stable-wicket creaked
Where Tim the ostler listened. His face was white and peaked.
His eyes were hollows of madness, his hair like mouldy hay,
But he loved the landlord’s daughter,
         The landlord’s red-lipped daughter.
Dumb as a dog he listened, and he heard the robber say—

“One kiss, my bonny sweetheart, I’m after a prize to-night,
But I shall be back with the yellow gold before the morning light;
Yet, if they press me sharply, and harry me through the day,
Then look for me by moonlight,
         Watch for me by moonlight,
I’ll come to thee by moonlight, though hell should bar the way.”

He rose upright in the stirrups. He scarce could reach her hand,
But she loosened her hair in the casement. His face burnt like a brand
As the black cascade of perfume came tumbling over his breast;
And he kissed its waves in the moonlight,
         (O, sweet black waves in the moonlight!)
Then he tugged at his rein in the moonlight, and galloped away to the west.

PART TWO

He did not come in the dawning. He did not come at noon;
And out of the tawny sunset, before the rise of the moon,
When the road was a gypsy’s ribbon, looping the purple moor,
A red-coat troop came marching—
         Marching—marching—
King George’s men came marching, up to the old inn-door.

They said no word to the landlord. They drank his ale instead.
But they gagged his daughter, and bound her, to the foot of her narrow bed.
Two of them knelt at her casement, with muskets at their side!
There was death at every window;
         And hell at one dark window;
For Bess could see, through her casement, the road that he would ride.

They had tied her up to attention, with many a sniggering jest.
They had bound a musket beside her, with the muzzle beneath her breast!
“Now, keep good watch!” and they kissed her. She heard the doomed man say—
Look for me by moonlight;
         Watch for me by moonlight;
I’ll come to thee by moonlight, though hell should bar the way!

She twisted her hands behind her; but all the knots held good!
She writhed her hands till her fingers were wet with sweat or blood!
They stretched and strained in the darkness, and the hours crawled by like years
Till, now, on the stroke of midnight,
         Cold, on the stroke of midnight,
The tip of one finger touched it! The trigger at least was hers!

The tip of one finger touched it. She strove no more for the rest.
Up, she stood up to attention, with the muzzle beneath her breast.
She would not risk their hearing; she would not strive again;
For the road lay bare in the moonlight;
         Blank and bare in the moonlight;
And the blood of her veins, in the moonlight, throbbed to her love’s refrain.

Tlot-tlot; tlot-tlot! Had they heard it? The horsehoofs ringing clear;
Tlot-tlot; tlot-tlot, in the distance? Were they deaf that they did not hear?
Down the ribbon of moonlight, over the brow of the hill,
The highwayman came riding—
         Riding—riding—
The red coats looked to their priming! She stood up, straight and still.

Tlot-tlot, in the frosty silence! Tlot-tlot, in the echoing night!
Nearer he came and nearer. Her face was like a light.
Her eyes grew wide for a moment; she drew one last deep breath,
Then her finger moved in the moonlight,
         Her musket shattered the moonlight,
Shattered her breast in the moonlight and warned him—with her death.

He turned. He spurred to the west; he did not know who stood
Bowed, with her head o’er the musket, drenched with her own blood!
Not till the dawn he heard it, and his face grew grey to hear
How Bess, the landlord’s daughter,
         The landlord’s black-eyed daughter,
Had watched for her love in the moonlight, and died in the darkness there.

Back, he spurred like a madman, shrieking a curse to the sky,
With the white road smoking behind him and his rapier brandished high.
Blood red were his spurs in the golden noon; wine-red was his velvet coat;
When they shot him down on the highway,
         Down like a dog on the highway,
And he lay in his blood on the highway, with a bunch of lace at his throat.

.       .       .
And still of a winter’s night, they say, when the wind is in the trees,
When the moon is a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas,
When the road is a ribbon of moonlight over the purple moor,
A highwayman comes riding—
         Riding—riding—
A highwayman comes riding, up to the old inn-door.
 
Over the cobbles he clatters and clangs in the dark inn-yard.
He taps with his whip on the shutters, but all is locked and barred.
He whistles a tune to the window, and who should be waiting there
But the landlord’s black-eyed daughter,
         Bess, the landlord’s daughter,
Plaiting a dark red love-knot into her long black hair.

 

Posted in poetry | Tagged , | Comments Off on National Poetry Month, day 28 AND Something for Thursday: “The Highwayman”

National Poetry Month, day 27: A Lesson from Mr. McLeod on “slipping the surly bonds of Earth”

I suppose there’s an entire genre that can be summed up as “Young person meets the teacher who unlocks their potential”. It’s a type of story that I’ve always warmed to, from Luke Skywalker seeking the wisdom of Ben Kenobi to Bilbo Baggins (OK, not a young person, but still) learning from Gandalf…to the books of John Bellairs, which always paired a young person with an adult wisdom-figure.

One of my very favorite instances of such a story is the 1993 film The Man Without a Face, in which Mel Gibson plays a reclusive schoolteacher, Mr. McLeod who is not allowed to teach anymore. Young Nick Stahl is Chuck Norstadt, a kid who needs tutoring so he can pass the test to get into the military school he wants to attend, and he somehow convinces Mr. McLeod to teach him. Mr. McLeod is badly disfigured by an accident in his past, and the circumstances of that accident will come back to haunt him, and young Chuck Norstadt.

The movie covers some similar ground as Dead Poets Society from several years prior, but for me, The Man Without a Face tells its story with far greater respect for its characters and insight for the relationships between them. Chuck isn’t just a kid who needs tutoring; he has issues of his own, like a dysfunctional family (he is the middle sibling, all to the same mother and all to different fathers). McLeod wasn’t just disfigured in a car accident; a troubled student had been in the car with him, and the questions that incident rose have dogged Mr. McLeod ever since, leading to his reclusive existence in a giant lonely house on the coast of Maine. (By the way, that house? Swooooon. Of all the houses in movies that I’ve ever wanted to live in, that one is at the top of the list.)

Along the way–before the story’s inevitable sad, and yet somehow hopeful, conclusion (which The Man Without a Face earns far more convincingly than Dead Poets Society did)–Mr. McLeod tutors young Chuck in geometry and rhetoric and other subjects, including poetry. The film doesn’t dwell on this, choosing instead to focus on the human relationships in the story. It becomes clear that Chuck is really looking for more than just a tutor, and Mr. McLeod is looking for more than a student. Both are looking to heal, for very different reasons. The film’s central insights aren’t just shoved on the characters, but they actually have to work for them.

At one point Mr. McLeod, knowing that Chuck wants to be a pilot, chooses a specific poem for him to read, handing him a book and telling him the page number and saying, “It’s all of fourteen lines, surely you can handle that.”

Chuck later reads the poem, and the film gives us a voiceover of him doing so. The poem is “High Flight”, by John Gillesipie Magee Jr. Magee, a pilot in addition to a poet, was killed in a flight accident in December 1941, just four months after he wrote “High Flight”, which has become his most famous work. He wrote “High Flight” in August 1941, which means that this poem entered the world right around the same time as my own mother. That’s kind of neat!

“High Flight” has had a life of its own, with its soaring and aspirational lyricism and its concluding lines, which sound like flight is the way by which humans leave this world and enter something higher. President Ronald Reagan quoted the poem in his address to the nation on the night of the Challenger disaster, and President Jed Bartlet would also quote it on The West Wing. It has been set to music a number of times (see below), and of course, the quote in The Man Without a Face, in which “High Flight” is the gift of a teacher to a student, because like all good teachers, this one knows what this student needs.

“High Flight”, by John Gillespie Magee Jr.

“Oh! I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth
And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings;
Sunward I’ve climbed, and joined the tumbling mirth
of sun-split clouds, — and done a hundred things
You have not dreamed of – wheeled and soared and swung
High in the sunlit silence. Hov’ring there,
I’ve chased the shouting wind along, and flung
My eager craft through footless halls of air….

Up, up the long, delirious, burning blue
I’ve topped the wind-swept heights with easy grace.
Where never lark, or even eagle flew —
And, while with silent, lifting mind I’ve trod
The high untrespassed sanctity of space,
– Put out my hand, and touched the face of God.”

In reading “High Flight” anew for this post, I noticed that the last stanza mentions that our high-flying human pilot has gone higher than eagles or larks. Higher, even, than The Lark Ascending.

Sometimes life connects the dots.

Original manuscript of “High Flight”. Photo courtesy Wikipedia.

Posted in On Movies, poetry | Tagged , | Comments Off on National Poetry Month, day 27: A Lesson from Mr. McLeod on “slipping the surly bonds of Earth”

National Poetry Month AND Tone Poem Tuesday: Messrs Meredith and Vaughan Williams

Back in my high school years, I was able to attend a performance of the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra at Kleinhans Music Hall in Buffalo. There were three works on the program. I don’t recall the first, sadly, and I was keenly looking forward to the program’s final work, Mozart’s Symphony No. 40 in G minor, which has always been one of my absolute favorite symphonies. There was a third work on the program with which I was completely unfamiliar, but that particular piece hit me between the eyes. It was a work for solo violin and chamber orchestra by Ralph Vaughan Williams (a composer I was just then discovering), called The Lark Ascending.

This piece absolutely captivated me, to the point where it became an all-time favorite work of mine on the basis of my very first hearing. A hauntingly lyrical suite that evokes the song of a bird as it takes flight into the morning mist, perhaps? At that point I had never heard anything quite like it. The sheer level of musical control needed by the performers to make this work the spell-casting masterwork that it is continues to stagger my imagination to this day.

But–what I did not know, or maybe I did at the time but never really internalized it, is that The Lark Ascending is based on a poem, by English poet George Meredith. I would think this fact had to have been mentioned in the program notes for that evening, but since I knew nothing of the piece, I likely didn’t file that information away at the time. And it disappeared from my mind entirely until a couple of weeks ago when I did a Google search for “music based on poetry”. And there it was: The Lark Ascending.

Meredith’s poem is surprisingly long, given its simple subject; but then, so is Vaughan Williams’s work, isn’t it? Fifteen minutes of impressionistic perfectionism based on the song and flight of a single bird.

Here is The Lark Ascending, in both its poetic and its musical forms. Play the piece while you read the poem: it really works.

 

He rises and begins to round,
He drops the silver chain of sound
Of many links without a break,
In chirrup, whistle, slur and shake,
All intervolv’d and spreading wide,
Like water-dimples down a tide
Where ripple ripple overcurls
And eddy into eddy whirls;
A press of hurried notes that run
So fleet they scarce are more than one,
Yet changingly the trills repeat
And linger ringing while they fleet,
Sweet to the quick o’ the ear, and dear
To her beyond the handmaid ear,
Who sits beside our inner springs,
Too often dry for this he brings,
Which seems the very jet of earth
At sight of sun, her music’s mirth,
As up he wings the spiral stair,
A song of light, and pierces air
With fountain ardor, fountain play,
To reach the shining tops of day,
And drink in everything discern’d
An ecstasy to music turn’d,
Impell’d by what his happy bill
Disperses; drinking, showering still,
Unthinking save that he may give
His voice the outlet, there to live
Renew’d in endless notes of glee,
So thirsty of his voice is he,
For all to hear and all to know
That he is joy, awake, aglow,
The tumult of the heart to hear
Through pureness filter’d crystal-clear,
And know the pleasure sprinkled bright
By simple singing of delight,
Shrill, irreflective, unrestrain’d,
Rapt, ringing, on the jet sustain’d
Without a break, without a fall,
Sweet-silvery, sheer lyrical,
Perennial, quavering up the chord
Like myriad dews of sunny sward
That trembling into fulness shine,
And sparkle dropping argentine;
Such wooing as the ear receives
From zephyr caught in choric leaves
Of aspens when their chattering net
Is flush’d to white with shivers wet;
And such the water-spirit’s chime
On mountain heights in morning’s prime,
Too freshly sweet to seem excess,
Too animate to need a stress;
But wider over many heads
The starry voice ascending spreads,
Awakening, as it waxes thin,
The best in us to him akin;
And every face to watch him rais’d,
Puts on the light of children prais’d,
So rich our human pleasure ripes
When sweetness on sincereness pipes,
Though nought be promis’d from the seas,
But only a soft-ruffling breeze
Sweep glittering on a still content,
Serenity in ravishment.

For singing till his heaven fills,
’T is love of earth that he instils,
And ever winging up and up,
Our valley is his golden cup,
And he the wine which overflows
To lift us with him as he goes:
The woods and brooks, the sheep and kine
He is, the hills, the human line,
The meadows green, the fallows brown,
The dreams of labor in the town;
He sings the sap, the quicken’d veins;
The wedding song of sun and rains
He is, the dance of children, thanks
Of sowers, shout of primrose-banks,
And eye of violets while they breathe;
All these the circling song will wreathe,
And you shall hear the herb and tree,
The better heart of men shall see,
Shall feel celestially, as long
As you crave nothing save the song.
Was never voice of ours could say
Our inmost in the sweetest way,
Like yonder voice aloft, and link
All hearers in the song they drink:
Our wisdom speaks from failing blood,
Our passion is too full in flood,
We want the key of his wild note
Of truthful in a tuneful throat,
The song seraphically free
Of taint of personality,
So pure that it salutes the suns
The voice of one for millions,
In whom the millions rejoice
For giving their one spirit voice.

Yet men have we, whom we revere,
Now names, and men still housing here,
Whose lives, by many a battle-dint
Defaced, and grinding wheels on flint,
Yield substance, though they sing not, sweet
For song our highest heaven to greet:
Whom heavenly singing gives us new,
Enspheres them brilliant in our blue,
From firmest base to farthest leap,
Because their love of Earth is deep,
And they are warriors in accord
With life to serve and pass reward,
So touching purest and so heard
In the brain’s reflex of yon bird;
Wherefore their soul in me, or mine,
Through self-forgetfulness divine,
In them, that song aloft maintains,
To fill the sky and thrill the plains
With showerings drawn from human stores,
As he to silence nearer soars,
Extends the world at wings and dome,
More spacious making more our home,
Till lost on his aërial rings
In light, and then the fancy sings.

Posted in music, poetry | Tagged , , | 1 Comment