That is all.
(Watch it in fullscreen if you can.)

The official site of Kelly Sedinger: Reader, writer, photographer, and dreamer
Time for linkage!
:: This past year, for spelling, there was this predictable pattern for the homework of approximately 20 words. (I’m fascinated by the acrostic exercise, and I wonder if it would have helped the terrible spellers I knew. On a side note, I often wonder about spelling. I can think of few areas where lack of ability is so divorced from, well, general intelligence. This is to say that I’ve known more than a few folks who are very bright and very articulate and who read a lot and who can hold forth on many topics, and yet, they can’t spell ‘cat’ without three Ms.)
:: Look at that curved beak, it is made for tearing apart his prey.
:: Using corsairs as the pirates is a good move too. I usually enjoy the liberty and style of Western pirates more than the structure and uniformity of the Barbary corsairs as presented here, but so many pirate films focus on the Caribbean that The Sea Hawk is a nice change of pace. (Until I read Michael May’s post, I had no idea there’d been an earlier film called The Sea Hawk, different from the Errol Flynn film that is one of my all-time favorites!)
:: The novel Fight Club only sold about 5000 copies, according to Palahniuk, and the rest of the print run might have been pulped if it hadn’t been for the Fincher film encouraging the publisher to get the copies back into circulation. That the film was no great financial success is a well-known story, as is the disastrous marketing campaign that Fincher still regards with chagrin—he recalls the head of marketing saying “You’ve found the perfect nexus—men don’t want to see Brad Pitt with his shirt off and women don’t want to see fighting.” (I never liked Fight Club, but almost purely on the basis that it simply isn’t my cup of tea. I honestly can’t cite anything that I specifically think is a flaw in it. I wonder what a return to that story will look like.)
:: In my not inconsiderable experience, even the most intelligent and literate authors have between 300 and 800 mistakes in an average sized novel. (Oy…my work’s cut out for me….)
I think we can overcome our own petty blindness. Sometimes we humans look up, not down, and see not just the Universe stretching out before us, but also our place in it.
We’ve done it before and we can—we must, and we will—do it again.
More next week. Or possibly not. You never can tell!!!
Oddities and items of questionable interest to occupy your time this Sunday morning!
:: How Secret Societies Stay Hidden On The Internet.
It all started with a Facebook message from a dead guy.
Seems to me a wild-and-wooly adventure novel, full of globe-trotting exploits and hidden treasures, should start with a line like that. Someone needs to write that. (Not me, I’m booked.)
:: It turns out that actors don’t always like other actors, and are sometimes quite willing to say so. For example, Rex Harrison on Charlton Heston:
“Charlton Heston is good at playing arrogance and ambition. But in the same way that a dwarf is good at being short.”
Ouch. More actor-on-actor insults here!
:: I am forever fascinated by questions of artistic process, such as “What’s your desk look like?” or “What’s the atmosphere of the room you work in?” or “What pen do you use?” Well, the world hasn’t gone completely to electronica: Creative Types on their Favorite Writing and Drawing Instruments.
I will show up at a client meeting with a museum director and curators with a bowl of about 50 Sharpies in different colors. People just never see that. It’s like candy. When I start sketching, generally the purple comes out first – it is strong, but not too out there. I also love orange. The different colors help you clarify things: layering, floors, spaces, doorways.
–Architect Kulapat Yantrasast, who loves Sharpies.
:: How they make Ramen noodles:
I don’t recall ever once eating at a Sambo’s, and if we did, it was likely on a road trip of some sort when we needed breakfast. I never knew about the racism in the name until the places were all gone.
:: Kevin Smith on walking on board the Millennium Falcon. (Salty language warning.)
:: Scared of heights? Don’t go to these places. I, however, would love to go to each one! (I’m not doing that “tether myself to the CN Tower and then lean over the edge” thing, though. That way, madness lies.)
:: My new life goal is to have a book of mine summarized on Thug Notes.
OK, that’s about all for this week. Enjoy and stay weird!
I meant to get this one done last week, but time intruded (I can’t believe how much time I spent trying to make my book trailer work!), and I never got the post written. I could have written it, really, but for this series I never write the post without having given the symphony in question a fresh hearing, and this one’s on the long side. Up now is the Faust Symphony by Franz Liszt.
Liszt is far better known as a composer of piano music than for his orchestral output, but that’s not an indication of quality so much as his life’s focus, as Liszt may well have been the greatest piano player in history. He’s certainly on my short list of musicians I would strive to track down and hear were I to gain access to a TARDIS or Doc Brown’s Delorean or Bill and Ted’s phone booth or…you get the idea. Liszt was so great a pianist that his life took on a rock star quality. He used his performing fame to fuel a full and complete musical life, as a composer and a conductor and essayist. Franz Liszt was the total package as a musician. Falling squarely in the Romantic era, you can hear in Liszt a great deal of the connecting tissue that led from Beethoven to Wagner. His music looks back and forward, and though he can be long-winded, his works invariably have moments of searing incandescence.
Years ago, when I was studying music in college, I attended a recital put on by the faculty, which they did once or twice a year. This particular recital ended with one of the piano professors, Dr. Reuter, playing one of Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsodies. It was a showpiece that, among us music students, pretty much brought the house down. I’d love to be able to hear Liszt himself, at the height of his powers, working that magic on the keyboard.
As for today’s symphony, A Faust Symphony is something of a hybrid, combining the symphony with the idea of a tone poem (or “symphonic poem”, as Liszt would call it). The full title of the work is actually A Faust Symphony in Three Character Sketches after Goethe: (1) Faust, (2) Gretchen, (3) Mephistopheles. It is not intended as a musical telling of the Faust story, but as a depiction of the characters themselves. I’ve never read Faust, and my only real familiarity with the story comes from the large number of musical works I’ve heard, most from the 19th century, that were inspired by it. (Chief among these is Berlioz’s amazing La Damnation de Faust.) The story of Faust had quite a hold on the imaginations of the Romantic era’s great artists, and Liszt was no exception.
This symphony employs typical symphonic construction, particularly in its opening movement, before becoming a cyclical work of tremendous drama in the third, after the lyrical and tender second. In this work Liszt does something quite Berliozian, while anticipating the musical language that would later be called “Wagnerian”. It’s a fine, fine work, atmospheric and brooding and dramatic…it’s Romantic, with all that the word entails. Here is A Faust Symphony by Franz Liszt.
I suspect that “scarvery” isn’t a word. Oh well.
In a bit of retail therapy this week, I made my first ever Etsy purchase, from tartx.com. The item in question? A new scarf! Check it out:
Yes, that’s old Will himself, the Bard, Mr. Shakespeare to you.
Here’s a closer look at Mr. Shakespeare:
And the printing at the scarf’s other end:
Spoilers follow, so I’m putting this after the break.
The Fault In Our Stars is one of those cultural bandwagons I’m only jumping on extremely belatedly. Green’s book is extremely popular, and has already been filmed (it’s playing now at a theater near you!). But I knew nothing about it, really, except that it was about two teenagers who fall in love in the midst of their mutual struggles against cancer. If that were all I knew, I doubt I’d have bothered, but I’ve seen enough good press about the book to be curious, and in our recent move, I saw that The Daughter owns a copy. So I gave it a read.
I came armed with tissues…but in the end, I did not need them. This is not an indictment of the book in any way. I was not unmoved by the story, but…well, it turns out that I knew enough about The Fault In Our Stars that there was a large degree to which reading the book felt like waiting for the other shoe to drop. I knew that one of these two lovers was not going to make it all the way to the last page, if not both. And as soon as I opened the book and noticed that it was in first person and figured out which of the two was narrating, well, that narrowed it right down quick.
It’s the girl, Hazel Grace Lancaster, narrating. So therefore we know – unless the book takes a really supernatural or spiritual turn at the end – that the boy, Augustus Waters, will die. The book doesn’t give us a long drawn-out death spiral for him, though; this isn’t one of those cancer stories where the healthy person finds out they have cancer and then they get sicker and then better and then sicker again and then start the long slow drift into death. John Green is after something else here.
As the book opens, Hazel is already at Stage IV. Her ending is already written, and all that’s left is however much fighting she intends to do along the way. She’s using an experimental new drug that is buying her time, but it’s always clear that this is all it’s doing. Her thyroid cancer is in her lungs now, and thus she is forever tethered to an oxygen tank. Augustus is a cancer survivor: his cancer has a high survival rate, and the worst it did was require the amputation of his leg. But in an early bit of foreshadowing, someone points out that a cancer “survivor” still has to spend the rest of their days keeping vigilant watch for the disease’s return.
Hazel and Augustus – as well as the other fellow cancer sufferers in the book – are all made acutely aware that they are some kind of “other” entity, not really allowed to have full lives, but not yet dead, either. They live in some kind of half-world that is pushed on them from without, a world of support groups and prayers that no one particularly feels are effective uses of time and long bouts of painful treatments and a general acceptance that their lot is to leave the world with so many things undone. For the most part, Hazel seems to accept all this, but she presents to the reader a kind of weary and jaded outlook, a sense that it’s all fairly meaningless. And yet, for all her fatalism, there are moments when he very real fears and raw emotions shine through, such as when she reveals that she once overheard her mother say that when she dies, “I won’t be a mother anymore.” That’s an awful burden for a child to bear.
Augustus, however – well, I found Augustus hard to like at first. He comes off as awfully sure of himself, and convinced of the holiness of his own ideas. Augustus Waters is prone to long discourses in which he elucidates at length whatever nifty idea has just popped into his head, and he’ll even insist on reciting his new idea before anyone else can say anything at all. He’s very sure of the things he thinks, and it feels at first like his own kind of defense mechanism, his carefully-honed impression of a guy who has figured out a lot of things. It’s something of a sham, though, and the moments do come when Augustus’s fears are laid out: he is afraid that his life will have been meaningless, that he will leave nothing behind to be remembered. He tries to cover this over with cynical talk, but it’s easy to see through it. Hazel sure does.
I was not quite enchanted by the book’s central “plot”, which involves the two young lovers going to Amsterdam so they can quiz the author of their favorite book about what happened after it ended. (He ended the book in the middle of a sentence.) I have to admit that in these scenes, I felt the hand of the author most strongly pushing things along. Green does, though, have the intelligence to not have the Reclusive Author turn out to be a warm genius who has all the answers; instead he is an alcoholic who has pretty much completely given up. He’s good at saying things that sound as if they might, on some level, be brilliant and profound, but Hazel and Augustus both see through this and eventually depart in anger. They’re not done with this guy yet, though, and he pops up again as Augustus reveals his dark secret: that his high-survival-rate cancer has returned with a vengeance, and he’s going to be on the bummer end of those statistics.
Augustus fades from the book fairly quickly, and Green is wise enough not to draw this out. There’s no final bedside farewell scene when everyone holds hands and Augustus quietly slips away. His death comes quickly, after a brief battle that doesn’t seem at all to have any hope whatsoever. Nor should it, really. This is all very wise on Green’s part: after all, if this book is Hazel’s narration, it’s clear that she would want to focus on the happier memories and breeze through the bad ones, to a certain extent. Even there, though, it’s not as if it reads like a defense mechanism. Hazel is someone for whom death is a concrete fact, but who also refuses to allow it to dominate everything, even when it does.
I struggle to describe my response to The Fault In Our Stars. It manipulates, but its manipulations felt honest to me. The emotions seem real and genuine, not forced, and even during the “literary quest” subplot, which does feel a bit shoehorned in, Green avoids the temptation to turn the man into a guru with life-altering wisdom. Green’s dialogue occasionally reads like writing – particularly when Augustus is speaking – but most times, the talk in this book is so natural that it achieves the dream of conveying vocal inflections with no adverbs and no attribution verbs other than “said”. One could do a lot worse than read this book just for the lessons in crafting dialogue alone.
Perhaps it’s my own life experience coming to bear, but as delicate and lovely as the love story between Hazel and Augustus is – and I can totally forgive John Green for writing it so that their first and only real date is a dinner at a waterside cafe in Amsterdam, with flower petals fluttering through the air – I find myself most haunted by Hazel’s parents. They aren’t really fully-shaped characters, which is appropriate since at Hazel’s age we simply don’t see our parents as fully-shaped people. Her mother’s fear, though – “I won’t be a mother anymore” – is real. That’s a real thing, folks. That’s what it feels like. Later on, it turns out that Hazel’s mother has been making her own preparations for what is to come, and making plans for afterward so she does not simply end up staring at the walls through a grief-filled existence. This does give Hazel some small degree of comfort, but she can never truly know what things are going to be like for her parents when she is gone, and neither can her parents. That particular emotional hole may well be the deepest a person can be plunged into, even when you know full well that it’s coming. This isn’t criticism, by the way – I’m not suggesting that John Green has missed something here by not focusing on the parents. Given the literary structure and focus he selected, he couldn’t focus on the parents. But that’s where my emotional sympathies are inexorably drawn, for reasons that I can’t really avoid.
Ultimately The Fault In Our Stars is both a hopeful book and a fatalistic one. We can’t flinch from the fact of our temporary existence, but we also shouldn’t flinch from the experiences that make our temporary existence bearable. In the end, Augustus writes to Hazel in words that he has almost certainly known will not be read until he is gone:
You don’t get to choose if you get hurt in this world, old man, but you do have some say in who hurts you. I like my choices. I hope she likes hers.
I don’t think it’s entirely coincidental that the words Hazel uses to affirm the last expressed hope of Augustus Waters are words commonly used in our culture to affirm marriage.
Revisiting a favorite work of mine today, because sometimes you need to remind yourself that once in the greatest of whiles, someone on this planet really does achieve perfection. Of course, perfection is a more reasonable goal if you happen to be, say, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. For the rest of us, it’s something to aim at in hopes of just getting better. For Mozart, “perfection” is what happens on a startlingly regular basis. That’s what made him Mozart, after all.
I find myself liking performance by school groups and youth orchestras more and more these days, because what you might lack a little bit in polish, you tend to make up for in fresh liveliness of the musicmaking. I have a greater appreciation for flawed passion of late. Here is a chamber orchestra, with soloists, from the New England Conservatory, playing Mozart’s Sinfonia concertante for violin, viola, and orchestra in E-flat major.
So, how frustrating is it when stuff that’s supposed to work wonderfully in this new gee-whiz techno-wizard world just doesn’t?
I had another post in this space earlier, but I had to take it down because it involved a link to another blog and I could NOT make the link work using Blogger’s mobile app. I tried a bunch of times and kept ending up with a broken link. Then I tried fixing it in Blogger’s web version (still on my phone), but that didn’t work either, so I’ll use that one another time.
This all comes on the heels of some enormously frustrating time I’ve spent lately with Windows Movie Maker, trying to make a book trailer for PRINCESSES. All I’m doing is literally stitching a bunch of brief movie clips together just to convey a bit of what I hope the book feels like, but this makes the program choke constantly. Again, something that should be pretty easy turns out to be a headache.
So again, how do you react when even your relatively modest expectations for your technology end up going awry?