1 Comment

  1. The smoke thing. As I remember the Clean Air Act (Passed in my lifetime, so not THAT long ago) specifically included a reference to PM 2.5 (which is the main pollutant in smoke) as being ESPECIALLY hazardous, because it gets much deeper in the lungs than PM 10, the larger particulate matter.

    But of course, people who become politicians “don’t need science” (I had a buddy in grad school who had a student tell him that) so they don’t care. But people were dying in the 1950s because of pollution from PM (the “killer fogs” in London).

    ISTG that some days I feel like I’m drinking goofy juice when I hear the stuff people spout off and how it compares with my education

Comments are closed.